Harvey's agent speaks out
Derrick Harvey's agent, Ken Kremer, had a telephone interview with the Florida Times Union. He explained his side of things and the current situation with the Jaguars.
Link
http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/080308/jag_312932340.shtml
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
Ummm..
The link doesn’t work when you click on it, so im just going to type it in.
by kujo24 on Aug 3, 2008 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Harvey said....
“All I really want is a market deal,” “I’m just waiting,” Harvey said. “I’m loyal to the Jaguars.”
“We’re hoping to get a resolution,” Kremer said.
I got your resolution, stop being a leach and talk realistic numbers. I mean come on, ‘somewhere between 10% and 75% is reasonable. What kind of idiot are you.
Harvey, dude look up the word ’ loyal ’, trust me you don’t know what it means.
To be master of oneself and never waiver in ones resolve.
- Maximus Desimus Meridius
by jagsrock on Aug 3, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And doesn't know market rate
Derrick and his agent are in their own world as far as market rate. Jerod Mayo, #10 is $4mil a year. That is market rate.
by Tkopa on Aug 3, 2008 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In fact...
Groves in in camp for just over 3 million. Do you really think you’re that much better than Groves…..I mean I’ve seen you both play. Try that for market value.
To be master of oneself and never waiver in ones resolve.
- Maximus Desimus Meridius
by jagsrock on Aug 3, 2008 2:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You know my position
Walk away from him. Save the money to sign real players. I don’t like this agent and now I don’t like Derrick Harvey. Sit him out, wait him out, turn him out. Just move on without him.
by Tkopa on Aug 3, 2008 3:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
makes no sense
why does everyone think he should sign for amounts lower than the picks after him? it seems like the big issue is whether he should get 18 or 18.5 million guaranteed. these are complex contracts and take time. it’ll work itself out.
by abeaugh on Aug 3, 2008 3:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
“Another bone of contention between the sides is that one of Harvey’s incentive clauses would be tied to 80 percent playing time, which is more than any Jaguars defensive end has been on the field in the past three years because the team rotates its linemen”
Does anyone else think this would be a ridiculous thing for Harvey to agree to?
I agree that the money being asked for is outragaeous, but maybe there are two sides to this. It is also worth remembering that Harvey didn’t ask the Jags to draft him at 8. There are monetary consequences to taking top draft picks, crazy though they are. I’m just amazed more of the veterans aren’t a bit pissed at how “little” they are paid compared to all the top draft picks this year.
by KeithG on Aug 3, 2008 4:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just Goes to Show ya+
Like I posted about Harvery waaaaayyyy back when we first drafted him…he doesnt want to be here…if he did hed take a deal as he is unproven…look at Garrard..he took less than he couldve gotten because why? He is all about the team…period.. I think the signs were always there from the beginning and he is begining to prove the naysayers wrong.
Groves will be the man in J-ville…peterson’s heir apparent…mark my words AGAIN!
Go Jags!
by freek1969 on Aug 3, 2008 4:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I remember
when you posted that. I remember being impressed that Groves was going to work on his technique before camp. You are right, all indications were there.
What is your suggestion for the Jaguars organization concerning Derrick Harvey?
by Tkopa on Aug 3, 2008 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Jags should be reasonable and give him JUST what he ASKED FOR
He wants fair market Value so? Give it to HIM. Fair market value this year appears to be about 13.5% over last years 8th rounder…The Jags reached a little for him…so they should have to tow that line…but apparently Harvey wants somewhere between 10% – 75% and then has the balls to himself say he wants fair market. It appears his definition of fair market and reality is a bit skewed,
But Ok fair Market for him would be 18.5 m guaranteed. Drop that on the table and if he says no…Jags walk and negotiate with the real beast coming back this year and pay the proven guy Mike Peterson…he deserved that money more than Harvey does. Is it coincidence Harvey and Mike Peterson have the same agent and are both making demands? They are trying to pressure the Jags into caving….
It looks like this…the Jags proven beast of a LB is suddenly demanding more money and the possibility of him sitting out exists until he does..which leaves the Jags with no beast LB that can do what he does….and the Jags need good play from them…so scare em with Mike Pete into paying for Harvey…. so in case Mike Pete sits out for more cash at least the Jags have Harvey….its the old carrot and stick routine…Jags should pay Mike Pete if they have to he is proven.
If Harvey cant figure out how to pick up the pen..then Jags walk and let him damage his own reputation…and remember hes sitting at home doing nothing and not getting paid…and if he doesnt get paid neither does the agent…Harvey will be bagging at Winn-Dixie for the next 2 years I guess..clean up on produce aisle Derrick?
Go Jags!
by freek1969 on Aug 3, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
love the line...
clean up on produce aisle Derrick?.....that’s great.
Anyway, first off, Mike P is just talking crap. As I have already said, he has earned our loyalty, but he is not going to hold out. We have the best linebacking crew in the league. When he was hurt, Smith took his place, Ingram took Smith’s, Durant rolled right in too. Dude they rocked on without skipping a beat. Mike, you are great, but you are on a great team. That team is winning games , not any one player. Relax you’ll get paid.
And second, Harvey,.... dude just come play football and the fans will forget about this crap after your first two sacks. Sign the papers.
To be master of oneself and never waiver in ones resolve.
- Maximus Desimus Meridius
by jagsrock on Aug 3, 2008 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes and it will backfire on the agent
because Del Rio has all the ppl in place to make a serious run at the Lombardi….Mike Pete is in a contract year and is angry..plays angry..ya think Jack didnt mention to Wayne…hey we need Mike Pete to play balls out to earn his contract…and if he does we can see the gleam of the trophy so DON’T negotiate with him…I want him angry and playing above his usual so the rest of the team can feed on it…! The blood is in the water!
Go Jags!
by freek1969 on Aug 4, 2008 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember that too, and even though I've always respected your opinion I thought you were reading to much into in, but...
It’s starting to look like you may be right, Harvey has the final say and he’s being unreasonable.
He may be getting bad advice from his agent, but he makes the call, Not Mr. Kramer. If he really wanted to be here he would’ve signed by now. It’s a business first everyone understands that, so Harvey wanting to get paid big is understandable, however, there comes a point when his value decreases.
Groves now seems to have inherited the mantle of big expectations from Harvey… If he plays well he’ll be hugely popular due to his great personality.
By the way Freek… nice call bro… You may have really been on to something with your perspective on Harvey. We’ll see if he signs by the first or second preseason game.
-Collin
by silencecs on Aug 3, 2008 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't give in
I hope the Jags hold firm and don’t cower into giving Harvey money he is not worth. Let him sit out the year and see where that lands him next year. I also think Groves is better!!
Who needs Harvey!!!!
by copper904 on Aug 3, 2008 5:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ken Kremer speaking in public is a mistake
It is a sign of deperation. He is looking for someone to help him in the negotiations. He is not winning and does not have a winning hand. It is a bluff and the Jags are calling it.
I am proud of our organization.
by Tkopa on Aug 3, 2008 5:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right on...
Kramer should’ve kept his mouth shut. Stating publicly that he wants somewhere between 10 and 75 percent showed just how outrageous his idea of fair market is.
Ken, like many other agents, are seeing their yearly cash sow in danger of dwindling and are doing what they can to get as many paydays as possible prior to the next CBA, which will undoubtedly include a rookie wage system.
I think you’re right Tkopa, just sit and wait. If Harvey doesn’t accept the offer prior to training camp, then I say we lower the pay to match last year’s #8 pick (who signed on time by the way). If we don’t sign him over the course of the year then he re-enters the draft. He’ll have NO hope of being a top 10 pick again, so he’d be throwing away all that money.
We just paid Spicer and Hayward seems to be back to his pre-injury form so the urgency to get Harvey on the field just isn’t there. Ken Kramer is really screwing this guy hard…
-Collin
by silencecs on Aug 3, 2008 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you Collin
I have posted this thought before, but want to share it again. Rookie pay scales are going the way of the real estate market or the 1999 stock market. The bubble is going to break.
Derrick Harvey can sign now, make a name for himself and later sign a great free agent contract. Derrick can have it all IF HE CAN PLAY FOOTBALL.
Derrick Harvey can sit home and throw a fit over being worth $10mil and no one recognizing his delusional value. And he will lose a lot of money while throwing that fit.
Time is running out on him and his agent. The game is almost over.
by Tkopa on Aug 3, 2008 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a football player attitude
Jaguars MLB Mike Peterson says he’s playing angry because the team hasn’t tried to extend his contract.
Peterson considered holding out, but opted to let his play do the talking. He is in a contract year. “I get chills just thinking about it,” he said. “That’s why I’m so angry. I go out there and play, and I’m mad. When I come off the field, I’m angry. I want to continue here. I want to retire here.”
by Tkopa on Aug 3, 2008 9:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What is the offer?
Does anyone know what offers are being submitted and rejected? Before we target either side as the problem we need to be sure that we’re not making up a scenario and then attacking Harvey…straw man.
To state that Harvey doesn’t want to be here because he won’t sign the contract is ludicrous. Does Fan like Garrard more because he didn’t play the “hold out” card? Sure. Garrard is also older, wiser, married with child and a different person than Harvey. I have no idea what Harvey’s situation is but you can’t take the hold out as an indication of the kid’s desire to play, ability to play or overall character. Is Fan willing to make that a universal condition of one who holds out? If that is the case then all players who hold out don’t want to play for their team and aren’t really that good.
This is a business deal where someone is trying to maximize earnings with their employer. The employer is looking out for the best interest of the company. Both are working within a flawed system. I’ve never understood the need for Fan to make this a good guy\bad guy situation.
If you would convince a man that he does wrong, do right. But do not care to convince him. Men will believe what they see. Let them see.
Formerly known as The Village Idiot.
by bwfull on Aug 4, 2008 9:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I’m actually astonished at how quickly people have turned against Harvey. 3 months ago he was the Jag’s saviour, now he is a greedy idiot, and “who need’s him?” The system is flawed. Harvey didn’t invent it. Maybe he IS hoping for more money than he should get, but “market value” is not dictated by him or his agent. Who here thinks every doctor/lawyer you encounter is worth their price? And who of you would turn down a 25% salary increase because, quite frankly, your job performance isn’t worth it?
Having said all that, I personally think the money paid to most professional athletes is just silly, and the money paid to unproven athletes is mind-boggling. This year’s draft class has just made it abundantly clear how ridiculous it all is. Hopefully this will result in somebody actually trying to remedy the situation. I just think making Harvey the fall-guy for a screwed up system, and trying to make deductions about his worth or personality, is slightly over the top.
I REALLY hope this get’s sorted out soon. There was a reason the Jag’s FO made all those moves to acquire Harvet at #8…. and it wasn’t because they thought Groves was the better player. As a Jag’s fan, I’d like nothing better than to have BOTH Harvey and Groves terrorizing QB’s for years to come. That’s it – end of story, I want both active and productive for my team.
by KeithG on Aug 4, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here is the problem
When Jack Del Rio calls the offers presented by Derrick Harvey’s agent outragous and rediculous, clearly there is a problem.
Derrick Harvey is asking for more money than all of our Pro Bowl players combined. More than all of our DE’s combined. More than Reggie Nelson, Reggie Williams, Maurice Drew, Clint Ingram and Justin Durant combined. In short, he believes he should be the highest paid player on the team, above David Gerrard. This is the problem.
The Jags bel;ieve the market is at $4mill a year, $15 mil guaranteed. Mr Harvey and his agent believe the market is at $10mil a year $20 mil guaranteed.
Check out the first round signings and the money and notice the difference between #10 and #7. That is the issue.
Derrick Harvey was lucky to be chosen #8 and should be paid what a #8 would get. Not 50% more than that.
Do we need Derrick Harvey at $10 mil a year? Answer that yourself. Should we release David Gerrard to keep him? Should we release Fred Taylor and Mike Petterson to keep him? Should we release Reggie Nelson, Maurice Drew, Justin Durant and Reggie WIlliams to keep him?
These are the questions. What is his value and what is the market. The agent is trying to drive the market through the roof. The Jags are trying to maintain a team in a balanced payroll. The fact is, they don’t need him as a player and they certainly don’t need him at $10mil per year.
by Tkopa on Aug 4, 2008 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed Tkopa, agreed. I’m trying to see both sides of the story, and I can see both points of view.
If the team doesn’t need him, why did they trade away so much to get him? If you are going to actively seek out a #8 (remember, the Jags CHOSE to take him at this position, and traded away a fair bit to get him), you presumably think he is gonna make a difference to your team. Otherwise, your FO needs firing. Why do this if you don’t need him as a player?
On the other hand… as you say, the amount is just silly. There is NO way I’d personally pay him more than MJD alone, let alone him and a whole bunch of others combined. But… do you expect a #8 draft pick to stand up in today’s setup and say “hey, I’m not actually worth that much… pay me less, please”. Again, he didn’t create the system or the payment structures.
As a Jags fan, I hope they get it fixed because I believe Harvey can make a difference for us over the years. At the same time, the thought of paying him so much when he is unproven turns my stomach. The system is broken, it needs fixing. It’s not Harvey’s fault, and taking it out on him individually is unfair on the player.
by KeithG on Aug 4, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Keith our FO is actually playing this brilliantly... Shack-Jack should be commended
We have the quality at DE at areasonable price already so the NEED to sign Harvey isn’t there. The Jags are not desperate like the Jets are and won’t overpay. That’s why we have had a healthy salary cap for so many years; there will be no repeats of the FO debacles during the Coughlin era.
If everything comes together as planned the Jags won’t ever need Harvey, but he’ll eventually sign. If Hayward comes back to form, Groves becomes a beast, and Spicer plays like he did last season, we’ll be set. The FO has all the leverage.
by silencecs on Aug 4, 2008 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad you see it
This is a negotiating clinic the FO is putting on and it is in the best interest of the team.
For the record, I am not saying Derrick Harvey is a bad guy and should take less than a market rate.
#10 Jerod Mayo gets $3.5mil yr and $13 mil guaranteed. Derrick Harvey should get $4mil a yr and $15 mil guarnateed. Then he should be humble and work his butt off for a great free agent contract in 5 years.
But if he won’t play for anything less than $10mil a yr and $18mil guaranteed, he has an attitude problem right off the bat. Everyone on the Jaguars team understands working for the money. Derrick Harvey needs to come down to earth first before he will be valuable to this team. We don’t need an overpaid prima donna. We need a well paid soon to be Pro Bowl caliber DE. Same as Reggie Nelson, same as Mercedes Lewis, same as David Gerrard, same as Maurice Drew.
by Tkopa on Aug 4, 2008 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holding Out
I agree…
The longer Harvey holds out the more he’s going to hurt himself. No other team can sign him untill next year. If he doesn’t sign, he’s gonna have to figure out a new way to make money while he waits. I really hope Harvey can sign for a reasonable amount, because there is no reason for the Jags to give in. We don’t need another DE, we just want one.
The Jags will win this match, because they hold all the cards.
by kujo24 on Aug 4, 2008 6:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not only that but...
If Harvey were smart, he’d have his agent take the lesser money guaranteed in return for only a 2 year deal. That way if he really is that good, in2 years he could say “Mo’ Money or I’m outa’ here!” Derrick , there is more than one way to skin a cat… uhh, I mean a colt.
To be master of oneself and never waiver in ones resolve.
- Maximus Desimus Meridius
by jagsrock on Aug 4, 2008 6:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Harvey
Derrick is a good college football player but he has not proven a thing in the NFL till he does he is just another good college football player . His money will come maybe not in this contract but his next one
Armand Riendeau
by ARMJAG on Aug 4, 2008 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Embrace the business.
Wow… I gotta hand it to the front office, Kremer, Harvey. I was steaming, jumping all over that “hate Harvey” band wagon, but like the gangstas say, ” it ain’t personal, it’s business”.
Actually I am relieved that the Jags front office is not that stupid when it comes to the finances of the team (just call us the Dallas Doughboys). Poor Harvey is the only sap to loose in this stand-off if you think 4-5 mill is losing. Ah, to be young and stupid again.
by Jaghomer on Aug 4, 2008 11:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs


















