Big Cat Country: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Vanderbilt 90, Tennessee 71: What Happened in Nashville

Jaguars' Play-Calling An Issue in Win Over Rams

Maurice Jones Drew makes the Jaguars a run-first team... So why don't they run more?

More photos » John Raoux - AP

Maurice Jones Drew makes the Jaguars a run-first team... So why don't they run more?

The Jaguars were lucky to get a win today, and that is due in large part to very poor play selection by the offensive coordinator. Dirk Koetter refuses to break tendencies enough, and he's a pass-happy collegiate coach who does what he wants, not what matches the team's strengths.

Dirk has already been called out by Torry Holt and MJD this year. Torry isn't happy with the route designs for the WRs, which speaks volumes to me because he came from arguably one of the most prolific passing offenses in history. If Torry says he isn't happy with the designs, then I would assume they may be lacking in some way. MJD called out Dirk for abandoning the running game, which Dirk has done in the past. He loves to pass the ball, and he should be forced to call more runs.

Dirk Makes Poor Play Selections

Blame the pick six David threw on horrific play calling by Koetter. The ball shouldn't have been in the air on that play, it should've been on the ground. Too many times we shied away from the run when we should have kept going there. Dirk Koetter gets too cute for his own good, and it hurts the team. Run blocking is much simpler for linemen to do from a technique perspective, and since both of our tackles are rookies, we should be running more than we are. I don't care about the totals in carries or yards, run the ball no matter what. The WR screen pass that Dirk seems to love, is almost always a wasted play. Dillard is the only player who has had success with that play. You are paying your RB top dollar, feed him the rock, don't get cute and try to pass out to a WR. Too much risk, too little reward.

Dirk is a Pass-First Coordinator on a Run-First Team

With under five minutes to play and holding the lead, we shouldn't be passing the ball on screens to Greg Jones on 2nd and short. When it's 2nd down and short, run the ball... don't pass it, or at least run a play action and take a shot down-field. Too many things can go wrong; a sack, fumble, interception, or penalty takes away your easy first down. We saw this happen on more than one occasion to the Jaguars due to Dirk Koetter's pass-happy selections.

How many times did we throw for 7-9 yards on first down, and then instead of running the ball, we went to the pass again, resulting in a sack, leading us to third and long. Which forces us to HAVE to pass again. Many times we had 3 straight pass plays when your weakness is pass-protection. Idiotic. We got lucky on one drive where we had two gimme pass interference calls, but without those, we wouldn't have done anything that drive. We went to pass, and lost enough yardage to put ourselves out of field goal range on one occasion, again due to the poor play selection.

Dirk Doesn't Grasp the Concept of "Tendencies"

Please, Dirk, break tendencies every once in a while. We didn't run the ball out of a single back set the entire game. When we went into a single back line-up, we passed the ball. On the pick-six play, Greg Jones was the single back in the play (2nd and short). It was after a substantial run by MJD, and rather than run a play-action pass, we run a flare to Greg Jones, which is intercepted because Leonard Little didn't even play the run on that play. He saw a single-back set, and Greg Jones (who rarely gets the ball), and he played Greg for the pass the whole way, which led to his interception and subsequent TD return.

Breaking tendencies doesn't just mean running on passing downs or vice versa. It means not running the same types of plays out of the same formations all the time. When we line up with Greg Jones alone in the back-field, he either pass blocks or runs a flare pattern. He's the highest paid FB in the league, and he should get the ball at least a few times a game. His raw power and size is the perfect compliment to MJD. Break tendencies, Dirk.

Dirk is Infatuated With the Shotgun

What kind of "run-first" team lines up in the shotgun on third and short. I can't tell you how many times the team lined up in that horrendous shotgun formation. FYI, the benefit to lining up in the traditional under-center set is that the QB doesn't have to take his eyes off the defense to recieve the ball (as he has to do in the shotgun formation). The shotgun's only benefit is that it provides extra protection due to a built in cushion. That benefit isn't of importance when you're running short to intermediate routes because you get the ball out before the defese could get to you anyway. However, Dirk continues to use the shotgun it situations where it hinders more than helps. We don't have to be in the shotgun every single third-down. It also eliminates any real threat the play-action can pose. No defense is fooled by a fake hand-off out of the shotgun.

Dirk Doesn't Know What Yard Line the Team is On

Dirk loves to pass so much, that when the Jaguars were in field goal range, on 2nd and short, Dirk calls a pass and Britton misses his man altogether (as rookies will do occasionally when pass-blocking), leading to a sack, which pushed us out of field goal range. Dirk, RUN THE BALL!!! I mean, c'mon man. I just can't grasp what Koetter is thinking when he's calling these plays.

Give the ball to MJD more, or anyone for that matter, just run it. If you try to say he got it to much, I defer to his huge contract, and the huge contract his FB has, and say to you, "Two players who's contracts total nearly 100million, should be on the field and getting the ball more... PERIOD." 

The Jaguar's got lucky today, but if their Offensive Coordinator doesn't improve and learn these simple things, then he'll hold us back from ever excelling (until we get the offensive line and WR's to run his pass-happy scheme).

-Collin Streetman

Poll
Grade Dirk Koetter...
A
44 votes
B
123 votes
C
133 votes
D
83 votes
F
55 votes

438 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 168 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hm...
What kind of “run-first” team lines up in the shotgun on third and short.

Well… I don’t think you should call him out for this. Why? Because the Jags were 11 for 16 on third down. You know what I want to do? I want to do whatever works. I believe that the reason the team is lining up in shotgun in those situations is because the rookie tackles are not developed yet, and they are both better at pass blocking that run blocking (from what I’ve seen).

Honestly, I believe the game plan worked great for the offense. The yards were there and the opportunities were there. The problem was that the players (our two top-payed player, too) lost the ball a few times. Garrard made a few mistakes. He shouldn’t have thrown to Jones on that screen. Check on you slot receiver in the situation.

I can honestly say that I believe it was the passing game in the first half that opened up the Rams defense for MJD to run in the second…

There could have been improvement, but I honestly saw no play calling that I totally disagreed with. I’ll watch the game again on TiVo tomorrow and will pay more attention to the calls, though.

by alwaysforgiven821 on Oct 19, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

But is he...

Getting killed as much as last year? And have you watched them specifically in run blocking situations? Monroe had his first decent run blocking game yesterday, whereas I would say he has been doing pretty well (as well as a rookie can be expected to do) in pass blocking. Britton is better are run blocking, but there have been a few times (I can remember three from memory) where he has let an outside defender fly by to tackle the ball carrier.

by alwaysforgiven821 on Oct 19, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm

There was some dodgy play-calling, for sure. But… I don’t know if I agree with your overall arguement. Mojo had 33 carries (rushing) in that game, it’s not exactly like he wasn’t being given the chance. And, quite frankly, our passing game was going damn well. Why would we stop doing what was successful?

I’m also not entirely sure we SHOULD be a run-first team. In the 1st half we had practically NO success with running the ball, or even with keeping the offense on the field. In part I believe this is because we ran too much. Once we started passing, the running game kicked off very nicely. I LIKED the fact that it was a balanced offense with BOTH the run and the pass having success. That only happens if you don’t try to force your offense into being either a “run first” OR a “pass first” team. Balance is awesome, and it makes both sides of the offense better.

Remember too that Dirk Koetter is still sort of “feeling out” what this team is capable of on offense. I honestly believe we have the potential to be an extremely good, if not dominating, offense. Not right now, of course. But, the potential is there… once the rookies have improved some and we’ve gotten some of the little kinks worked out (including play-calling and figuring out who is capable of what) we could scare defenses.

by KeithG on Oct 19, 2009 11:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That was a close win.

Good game Jags, feels so nice looking down at those sagging tits in the basement.

You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by CFHTim on Oct 19, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Too close for comfort

This game should have been open and shut, with the whole second half being garbage time, well that couldn’t be farther from the truth. First and foremost, yes we won the game, yes we had pretty good 3rd down conversions, etc but we won that game on pure talent and heart, NOT ON PLAY CALLING. Blind luck got so through most of the crap Dirk was calling, I know our passing game is developing nicely with Sims-Walker and Holt etc but when you have a top 3 RB and FB against a 23 ranked rush defense you RUN THE BALL. Oh and when Dirk did run the ball IT WAS INTO A STACK BOX OF 9!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DEFENDERS, LIKE COME THE HELL ON!!!! I was going to imploded during the game. The bottom line is he should be packing his bags, and his head is the one we ALL should be calling for!

by Messina on Oct 19, 2009 11:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think teams are going to have weeks like this.

The only thing that matters is the victory. Did anyone expect the Raiders to beat Eagles?

You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by CFHTim on Oct 19, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if I would go that far yet...

But you’re right on to blast the play calling for this game.

33 rushes and we went to overtime… 43 passes. Run when you’ve got the game in hand… give it to JONES DREW and put the responsibility for closing out the game on his shoulders. There is absolutely no excuse to pass when you’ve got a backfield as expensive and talented as the JAgs is, when you’re winning in the fourth.

Isn’t that the ideal situation… Get the lead and the ball in the fourth quarter, and then run out the clock with your all star RB and FB…

I wasn’t happy with the overall playcalling. Terry is right, I was bitching about the calls to him the whole game… lol

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The game I saw

had MJD with 8 carries for 11 yards at the half. And what was the defense doing ? If they’re putting 8 and 9 guys in the box, than you pass the ball if you can. And this just in, we can.

I love it when you first complain about predicable play calling and then chastise the screen to Greg Jones because on 2nd and short they should’ve run a predicable play -(run or play action deep)

Plays that work are good. Plays that don’t are bad. Period. Garrard through a bad pass or that would’ve been a great play call. Plain and simple.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd be willing to bet had they run the ball

and not made a first down and STL had come down and scored to take the lead late, you’d be on here today complaining about the play calling and how predictable it was running the ball into a defense stacked against the run and advocating they should’ve mixed it up with some screens.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would never complain about running the ball too much

I don’t think I’m a negative nancy… I guess you’re satisfied with barely beating a team that had lost 15 straight games…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

trust me

gators fans are fine with beating matt jones’ alma matter by 3. Its professional football, any win is satisfying. Oh and the int play to little was on 2nd and 10 not 2nd and short so dont come calling for dirk’s head. Players not plays.

by fortzj on Oct 19, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

my point was had we gone 3 and out running the ball

you would’ve complained that the play calling was too predictable.

You’ve done that throughout this discussion. You call him predictable and than call him out when he does something outside of the norm, like throwing a screen pass on 2nd and short. The play wasn’t executed well. That’s the problem. Not the play call.

I’m happy we won the game and were able to overcome our mistakes. That’s not always the case and I view it as a team that is growing.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry you still don't grasp what I mean by tendencies... even after I've explained it in the story and direct comments to you....

I’m done replying to you… my answers are all in your previous posts.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree with your entire premise

Currently – we have run the ball 161 plays and passed 131 plays. That’s a 55% to 45% run play advantage – so it’s not accurate to say that we are no longer a ’run first" team. It would be more accurate to say we are no longer so lop sided towards running plays ( a sorely needed change).

Player personnel has changed the dynamics of this team. We no longer have two high caliber backs and our interior line is no longer as dominant as they once were. Opposing defenses are stacking the box to defend the run and daring David to beat them. And guess what – when David has played well we’ve won and when he hasn’t we’ve lost. This team has needed to develop a serious passing game for the longest time – we are currently in that process and I welcome it.

The best game we’ve played was against Tenn. There the tits stacked the box and the play calling was superb – we did break tendancies but more important – David was able to EXECUTE the plays that were called. As a result – David repeatedly burned the tits to the point that by the 2nd half – they had abandoned stacking the box and our running game became more effective as a result.

I think the bigger problem has been David’s inconsistent play vs Koetter’s play calling.

by OGN on Oct 19, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hmmm.... speak to some examples I gave during this game...

Like passing the ball on 2nd and short in the fourth quarter with the lead… Riddle me that call.
or The one where we were in field goal range on 2nd and short, a pass is called, resulting in a sack putting us out of field goal range.

Surely you wouldn’t advocate for either of those ludicrous calls

Speak to specific examples of poor play calls I mentioned, I’d love to hear your take on them, because I’m sure we’re in agreement on many points… It is OBVIOUS, after all.

We’re succeeding despite the play calls… not because of.

What about how we almost NEVER run out of a single back set… It’s like a calling card to pass the ball… Why does he so rarely break tendencies in formations.

I would argue David has been exceptional, but Dirk thinks he’s Peyton, when he’s really just the PERFECT example of a premium game manager. He can beat you if he’s got to, but it might not be pretty. That’s why when you’ve go the lead in the fourth, or you have an opportunity to get an easy first down and keep the chains and clock moving, you do it. We don’t have Brady or Peyton… WE’ve got Garrard. A very good QB and athlete, but not one of the best in the league. So stop passing the ball like we’re the Patriots…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or how about The shotgun being used in third and short consistently...

I don’t like it. The QB has to take his eyes off the defense to get the ball from the center, and if you’re running short routes on third down and short, you would get rid of the ball before the linemen even get close. Too much risk, too little reward…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sometimes when the short yardage

plays aren’t working against a stacked front. It is wise to get in shotgun and spread out the defense, would rather see Gerrard run the draw then throw it in those situations.

You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by CFHTim on Oct 19, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you now changing the arguement? I'm serious with that question.

Your article inferred an entire body of work season to date. Based on that, I stand by my earlier comments. If you want to question individual calls during a specific game (which it appears you are now doing) then that changes the dynamics of the arguement and should be discussed in that light.

For example – your point about not running out of single back sets. If your arguement is he never broke that tendancy for this particualr game – then we are in agreement. I do not know if that has been the case for the entire season however.

You and I will have to agree to disagree about David’s play for the season to date – it’s been inconsistent. When he’s on -he’s been great and when he’s not, he’s been not so great. He has a tendancy to hold the ball too long, especially on 3 step drops, he doesn’t know where to go with the ball if his primary guy is covered sometimes, and he’s late on throws as well. His WRs did a nice job of baling his ass out a couple times yesterday on some inaccurate passes.

by OGN on Oct 19, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Players or Plays

I think our issue yesterday for me wa the number of points we left on the table.

MoJo makes touchdowns no matter the call. Very rarely does he go in untouched.

David threw a lot of bad balls yesterday and didn’t see open guys.

Players make Dirk look good, players make Dirk look bad. The question is the probability of success on each play called. I like a lot of what Dirk Koetter does. I wonder about some things. The WR screen is a nothing play except when Jarret Dillard ran it. Dirk loves that play for some reason. However the misdirection plays look very good to me.

I give Collin credit for going into this debate despite the fact that the Offense is the only thing holding this team at .500. The defense is barely hanging on, the offense is keeping them in the game.

500 yards of offense and he is screaming at the OC and not the defense. He hears a different drummer.

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 19, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calling out the defense is pointless. We all knew they were not going to be very good this year.

That is a definate player issue and will need to be addressed in future off seasons (yes that was plural). I do agree with Collin in that Harvey is not being used properly – he’s a 4-3 DE and not a OLB trying to cover TE’s – that’s stupid.

Let’s discuss the screen play. Based on Collins premise – we’re a run 1st team. So in a short yardage situation, our tendancy would be to run the ball. Guessing that the opposing D will be thinking the same, it would be reasonable to expect them to shoot the gaps, crowd the line, and maybe even blitz. Opposing D’s have certainly been crowding the line consintently against us this season. In such a case, getting a speedy WR the ball quickly and in space and getting past most defenders would seem to be an ideal situation. So I ask you – players (executing a play) or play calling. Sorry, but I blame a horrible pass thrown by David Garrard on David Garrard.

by OGN on Oct 19, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmmm... Well, when you've got short yardage, and the lead in the fourth, and one of the top backfields in the NFL...

You put it on MJD and GJ’s shoulders and run the ball… 2 downs to get first, and that takes up over a minute of time for those two plays, and then you can force the Rams to waste T.O.’s.

On 2nd and short in field goal range, get the first, don’t get cute (and get sacked). Period…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What was the defense doing ?

If they were in a goal line formation than you pass the ball.

How can we bitch about predictability and then when they mix it up and it doesn’t work, we bitch they didn’t follow the standard plays that everyone knows ?

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know some would misunderstand my point about tendencies, and it's clear you have done so.

Did we run out of a single back set… no. Did we focus on where we were on the field when calling plays… no. Did we run the ball enough when we had the lead in the fourth… no.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will agree with your point on the sack that took us out of FG range.

I do not agree with you on the screen pass – that’s 100% on DG. If that hits, it could help us put the game away. Dirk doesn’t trust our D and he shouldn’t.

by OGN on Oct 19, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think my argument was pretty clear... even in the title... I was talking about this game OGN.

JAGUARS PLAY CALLING AN ISSUE IN WIN OVER RAMS…

The focus was always this game, not the season. Sorry if that wasn’t clear. I mentioned specific examples from this game that I was asking you to address. I mentioned them both in the article, and in my response to your original comment. the play calling was an issue yesterday, and is why we didn’t blow out a much less talented team.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I agree 100% with everything you just said.

Collin does have a point about trying little screen passes in the 4th quarter when we are ahead, though. The situation was tailor made for running out the clock.

by KeithG on Oct 19, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Might i just add

… no matter whether the play-calling was good or bad, or whether we have predictable formations etc. isn’t it just damn nice to have a 100+ yard rusher and TWO 100+ yard receivers in one game?

by KeithG on Oct 19, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll agree with that...

We should’ve had all that without going into overtime though, and we should’ve put up another 10-20 points…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

… but I doubt that is entirely the fault of the play-calling. Mojos fumble and the tipped INT where not planned for.

But, I agree that we really SHOULD have had that game sewn up by 3rd quarter. It’s a young team, we make mistakes. The talent is there, not the polishing.

by KeithG on Oct 19, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just glad we scored some points. lol

I wanted to cry (not literally… well maybe) when we got shutout by the Seahawks.

by Blair72 on Oct 19, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats how I felt

When Chris Brown fumbled the ball into the endzone.

You are banned from Music City Miracles.
Happy Now Tits?
You are banned from Blogging The Boys.

by CFHTim on Oct 19, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed!

As much as I like DG.. you don’t throw that ball to GJ. He hadn’t even cleared the defender when he threw that ball and LL read it perfectly. It was as if DG threw the ball without even looking, and when he did it was too late.

Also, this game was much closer than it should have been due to turnovers. MJD’s fumble and DG tipped pass INT kept this game close. If we score on those 2 possessions then I don’t think we see that screen pass.

Furthermore, Spagnoulo is not a prevent kind of guy. He attacks! If he’s going down..he’s going down doing what he does best regardless of the personell.

by JagsCub on Oct 19, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's one of those passes

you take for granted. It just happens from time to time. You don’t expect the DE to make that play. When Garrard was starting his throw, Little hadn’t even peeled off of his primary assignment yet.

And as for Greg Jones not having cleared yet, well if you wait that long you often times get sacked. All I can blame the offense for is the lack of disguising what they were doing in the process of the play, from the way the OL released to Garrard’s eyes cheating over too soon.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol, I should. and Monachino,

I know he’s not the guy everyone expects to catch flak after a 500 yard offensive display, but against those Rams, we should’ve done even more… It shouldn’t have been close.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We domainting

and without the turnovers, it would beeen a 10+ victory. Instead the Jags win a big game, which will booost confidence, but force them to be mucgh better. I think thgis overtime win will be bigger dfactor to make the Jaguars a TEAM!

Life without knowledge is death in disguise

by Zoltan from Budapest on Oct 19, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How many

yards were you hoping for exactly? I believe that was the 4th most yards in Jaguars history.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 2:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

kind of hard to blame the OC for lack of execution on the players part (3 to’s)

by OGN on Oct 20, 2009 7:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm still waiting on Ewdtrey to come blast me for this article... lol. I know he's a fan of Dirk's work.

He’s probably researching counter-points now…

I will say I like Dirk Koetter, but he gets too cute for his own good, and has the issues I listed above. Those are my problems…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 12:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You're right

I’m a huge fan of his. I have only one beef with him right now. I don’t like that after nearly every long pass that gets us into the redzone we always go to an inside run.

In reality though, he is masking so many weaknesses on offense most don’t even notice. Like the fact that we can’t run left. And the inconsistency in personnel we have on the OL, shifting people in and out. That’s hard to do when a Spagnulo team seems to throw every blitz there is. He has to some degree do what the old saying says: Keep it simple stupid. We do have a pretty new offense. Only Garrard, MJD, Marcedes Lewis, and Greg Jones played most of last year with the Jaguars. Koetter also had to mask other weaknesses like Garrard’s weaknesses for certain types of passes or Marcedes Lewis’ weakness for catching certain types of passes, and the same goes for Mike Walker and lack of depth at RB behind MJD, which might be critical by year’s end. Jennings needs to learn how to pass block better, giving up a sack last week.
Koetter is also doing a lot of things I would have hoped he would do this year, like using our extra OT’s and pass catching TE’s, leaving MJD in more for pass blocking, WR screens and end-arounds, letting Garrard make some easier audibles, not making Garrard use his legs too often on 4th and short in critical situations.
Keep in mind he’s going into his 3rd year, a crucial year for OC’s, and he’s still seems able to call plays that lead to a lot of offense. Look at a lot of the supposed “innovative” OC’s that flame out in their second year, with even more weapons at their disposal. The guy has always been a pass first mind and yet coordinated some pretty darn good rushing offenses.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 3:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Forgive me

if some of that doesn’t make sense. I kept remembering things I wanted to add making it kind funky in places. (Not to mention the lack of sleep)

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 3:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dirk's play calling reflects the change in dynamics associated with the change

in personnel. We no longer have a dominant interior line. We no longer have 2 top shelf backs. He also wants to develop a legit passing threat and now has at least the nucleus of personnel to do that (a sorely needed change IMO).

I like Dirk’s play calling – is it 100% perfect – nope. But viewing this team through the prism of 2007 isn’t fair – with 29 new players, it’s a different team with different strengths and weaknesses. Play calling should reflect that if he’s anything worth keeping. I also think the offensive philosophy is changing to a much more balanced attack (55% run / 45% pass).

by OGN on Oct 20, 2009 7:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Play calling vs. selection of plays

Last year we were crying about how we don’t passing game , DG doesn’t have good WR, so when we couldn’t run the ball it was because we couldn’t strech the D.
Now we have good passing game, 2 good WR’s, RB that can catch the ball, but our O-Line needs to adjust to pass-pro, as we all said we were run first team, it’s proces , long one, and for our young OT’s to get to know older guys in Line, experience.
We need to give guys some more time, it may be ugly but I’m sure it’s gona be good at the end.
I think Dirk is still testing what our guys can do, like a test drive, get to know what is our strenght, and weaknes.

by Nikola R on Oct 19, 2009 12:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It wyas really a goood written piece

but I agree with those who says players not plays. It is a pass first offense, because right now, The Jaguars have depenable receivers. A lot of them. (Holt; MSW; Thomas; Marcedes; Zach Miller-and he he can step up then Dillard plus MJD too) The running game is Maurice and that’s it. You cannot build on 1 man (actully Garrard is running a lot- for his life mostly) your running game. I love too see a bit Greg Jones and Jennings, but they are not in the same category as maurice. Fred was last year in that category, but now I think nobody belongs there(maybe Garrard?)
So yeah sometimes you don’t understand the playcalling. But I’m not throwing anyone under the bus in the next 2 weeks.
But I think this article creating a legitim debate about Koetter, so thank you very much Collin.
(Oh and by the way, Koetter has one secret weapon, he can count on a battleteal T-shirt (almost) every Sunday what the Titans got for example:? They suffer from the curse of the Terrible Towel since weeks. I hope on Nov. 1 the curse, and the Battleteal TS combine will help Koetter and the Jags for another win!)

Life without knowledge is death in disguise

by Zoltan from Budapest on Oct 19, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh I give Koetter a C

The best grade would be a B-; but I’m OK with the guy for now.

Life without knowledge is death in disguise

by Zoltan from Budapest on Oct 19, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I gave him a B

Heck – if there hadn’t been those turnovers I’d be giving him an A+ – but those turnovers did happen, and I give him a B because he was able to call the plays that brought us a win in those last two drives.

by alwaysforgiven821 on Oct 19, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't blame him

for at least 2 of those TO’s. He didn’t fumble the ball or let a pass get tipped.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 3:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ill tell you Blair,

Im not only confused, I am absolutely dying to know why GJ doesnt get more carries!

by indianajagfan on Oct 19, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I remember correctly

they gave him a bunch of carries in the pre-season and he couldn’t do anything. Maybe its the same in practice and his RB days are behind him.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder why the PA Bomb or the MJD, throw it long play hasn't been used

maybe it was just to excite the fans.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Flavour of the Day is Turf. - Courtesy of the Jacksonville Jaguars
Keeper of the "That's what she said"

by TheTealDeal on Oct 19, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry...posted this on the wrong article

With all due respect…
…when they couldn’t pass we complained about that. Know that they pass too much that is an issue. It can be argued that at times the play doesn’t match the situation, however I’m sure no one questions Manning or Brady throwing on 3rd and 2. With the youth at WR and the OL, I am ok with this team attempting to establish a passing game by throwing on run situations. It keeps the defense off guard and demands respect in the passing game, thereby opening up the run game. As we’ve seen the past 2 weeks, teams can stop MJD if they’re not respecting the pass.

What Koetter may be exposing, or attempting to assess, is whether DG is worth keeping. I’m all for making him make plays rather than resting on whether he will simply manage the game. They’ve invested a great deal of money in DG and he should be able to come through in clutch times, as he did yesterday.

The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall.
Vince Lombardi

by bwfull on Oct 19, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

see my argument in the comment above... Garrard is not Manning or Brady... that's why you don't pass on third and two...

Do either of those teams have a back like MJD who almost ALWAYS gets the first on third and short… No..

If any Colt trolls are reading this… Addai/Donaldson are not in the same category as MJD… so just stop it…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point isn't whether they have a comparable RB

When a team, like the Jags, has the youth (and recovering vets) at o-line, the running attack will not keep you fed. Look at the past 2 games. DG doesn’t need to be PM or TB, but we do need to know if he can be counted on to complete a pass on 3rd and 2 if the other team is stacking the box. I’ve seen enough Jaguar football to remember more than a handful of times when this team was 2nd and short and they couldn’t convert. They will never develop a passing attack if they want to define themselves as a running team and they simply do not have the o-line to be the running team they once were.

Simply put, you should be able to do whatever you want on 3rd and 2. If your QB comes to the line and reads run blitz he should check off and hit the TE on a quick out or the WR on a quick slant. Heck, double pump to draw the safety and hit MS-W going deep?

This is no longer a 2 back team and it can no longer be solely a run team. They have got to mature to something greater. Koetter was brought here to make the vertical attack functional. The players need to execute.

The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall.
Vince Lombardi

by bwfull on Oct 19, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha colt trolls...

But in all honesty I thought DG played excellent yesterday, just got some shit luck on his tipped INT and a lucky catch by a DE. We dominated and I can take away that we won 34ish to 10. Cause thats truly what it wouldve looked like had we not had some turnovers in bad spots.

by harveyismyboy on Oct 19, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh and....

Ive heard Dillard mentioned a couple times but i watched the game and dont remember him catching a pass….

by harveyismyboy on Oct 19, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

Only i saw him was in the pre-game drills.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Flavour of the Day is Turf. - Courtesy of the Jacksonville Jaguars
Keeper of the "That's what she said"

by TheTealDeal on Oct 19, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just watched the replay and if Garrard gets that pass

over little, that was going to be a huge play. Blockers out in front and really no defenders. Probably because they were all in the box looking for the run up the middle.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 1:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

There was no room to run, but if that screen had gotten off then we wouldn’t be talking right now. I believe it was a good, and the right play call to make. Little make a good play reading the possible screen and getting between Garrad and Jones – but he did that to prevent the screen. I doubt he though Garrard would throw it with him there. It was a bad decision. I love Garrard, but that was his fault, not Dirk’s.

by alwaysforgiven821 on Oct 19, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hilarious

In all honesty why are we questioning the offense period when the huge disadvantage we have is our defense…Also as far as MJD goes he whines too much….Look at his stats early they were stuffing him easily…Then we pass and open up which opens up the run….If we really focused on MJD getting the ball early we would be behind so much in games…IMO we shoulda never gave him a big contract…The truth is one develops the other and thats a fact…If you are running well the pass game opens up cause theyre focused on the run and vice versa…

by kingsmasher on Oct 19, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think he deserves his contract

but until now we’ve been a team that couldn’t pass the ball and teams are still lining up to shut down the run and make us beat them with the pass. And so far in games that we’ve proved that we can beat them with the pass, the run opens up later in the games.

As the season goes on and Garrard continues to put up big passing numbers we’ll see a lot more honest play from the defenses and MJD should be able to run better early.

Until then, I see no reason not to take what the defense give us.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah he is fantasy number 1 cause when we get in to the 5 yard line its not a question who gets the ball…but if you look at the success of teams who win super bowls big contracts to a running back arent winners….and thats another fact….I mean look at the NFL the Giants last year had 3 back earth wind and fire….whens the last time ladainian tom or steven jacksons team won a Super Bowl….Who else makes MJD money now and has won a SUper Bowl…Running Backs really are a dime a dozen

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good backs

are a dime a dozen. Special backs, like MJD, are a commodity not everyone has.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 21, 2009 3:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and a 1st round pick in fantasy leagues

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Flavour of the Day is Turf. - Courtesy of the Jacksonville Jaguars
Keeper of the "That's what she said"

by TheTealDeal on Oct 19, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fumbles

The more MJD gets the ball more of a chance to fumble and thats a fact based on his past…So apples to apples….Too…If the Jags developing into a nice passing team would always be exciting and put people in the stands..>Watching the Jags is like watching rugby when they run so much…puts me to sleep…

by kingsmasher on Oct 19, 2009 2:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hmm... well, you can always watch the Gators run the ball 75% of the time...

And Scream about wanting Tebow…

Teams that run the ball and stop the run, win the game. I’m sorry, but effectively running the ball is the most exciting thing to watch on the field. It’s a joy to see pure rugged smash mouth football. Especially when your team is on the positive side of the physical beatdown.

Why do you think we almost always play the Colts well… Because we pass as well as they do? NO, because we run the ball on them and stop their run. That will ALWAYS give you a chance, even against the best passing teams (which we are not).

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just a question

“teams that run the ball and stop the run, win the game”. Is that still the case in this age of rules that favor the passing game? Does that mantra explain the colts success, or that of the patriots? Or the cardinals, or the steelers? Or the saints?

I think teams that pass well, do well. Teams that run well can hang in there. Teams that can’t run well without a decent passing game go nowhere. Obviously a team with a dominant O-line AND a super star RB can go far running it. But, we don’t have both of those.

Having said that…. I personally enjoy watching running football. But, I also like watching us win. and if that requires a lot of effective passing, so be it.

by KeithG on Oct 19, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

GREAT POINTS... I LOVE THE DEBATE ON THIS SITE...

Keith… right on brother… The key component here is teams have to be able to run effectively to win in the winter time in inclement weather. That’s when the playoffs are, and that’s when passing teams struggle the most (except for the amazing Tom Brady who throws in the snow like it’s nothing).

I’ll argue that teams like the Saints, Cardinals, and Colts don’t have a great amount of post season success consistently.

The Steelers are still a running organization that wants the lead in the fourth quarter to run the clock out. That’s their mentality. run the ball, stop the run. They are the pinnacle for success in the league and they’ve done it the correct way.

Tom brady is an anomaly of a human being… that’s all I can say as to the Patriots Success.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very Good Point

If people cant see the NFL and rules committee definitely want to develop the NFL to a more exciting passing game….and like the topic of this article the Jags hired Koetter knowing what kind of mind frame he had…Passing attack….But whats funny is the Jags hired him they were wanting to be a run team…Its a typical case of the Jags just getting what they could for the money….also Koetter got fired from his previous job….

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Koetter was hired to give their running offense a complementary passing game.

And now there is a passing game, while MJD still gets his carries. With the roster still in transition, right now the strength of this offense tends to be the passing game, but that’s hardly Koetter’s fault. Or rather, he might be doing his job a little too well.

In Gene We Trust.

by MoveThoseChains on Oct 20, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are right

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm curious, Collin

This is a very well-written piece. I don’t agree with all of it, but as always, you’ve done your homework and brought the big guns.

Aside from 4 runs by David and 1 by Jennings, MJD had 33 carries. Over a 16 game season, that would be 528 carries. History suggests that MJD would never be the same after that. Goodbye, best offensive weapon. In that light, [honest question] would you really have wanted Koetter to have MJD take even more pounding? Would you have preferred more draw plays for Garrard? Maybe more carries for Jennings or Greg Jones?

In Gene We Trust.

by MoveThoseChains on Oct 19, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think Greg Jones, the highest paid FB in the league, should be utilized more than he is.

I’m happy with Jones Drew at 20-25 carries… maybe 30 touches a game. Someone else needs to be our alternate back… This is a running team and we need more than one Rb getting the ball consistently.

Greg Jones or R. Jennings need to get more involved, and earlier in the game. Greg Jones is a beast, and the cumulative effect of running the ball with MJD and Drew at a defense is something that pays dividends as the game progresses. By the fourth, you can basically run over them… A thing of beauty.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

*MJD and Jones... nor MJD and Drew...*

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jennings better get some confidence

He runs tentative.

The greatest accomplishment is not in never falling, but in rising again after you fall.
Vince Lombardi

by bwfull on Oct 19, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

disagree - I think he's a physical runner - he lacks experience and as such

is sometimes indecisive on where to go. I think you may be confusing that with being a tentative runner. They are not the same thing.

by OGN on Oct 19, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Slasher

They need a slashing back who can make the cuts cause we do NOT have one of those

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A slasher would be nice

especially with new more mobile OL. But in reality, we need 2 more backs or one more back with two elements to bring to the table. Some with speed, and someone that can run between the tackles. I think both Jennings and Greg Jones can be good in the screen game, but both of them don’t seem to be productive between the tackles. Ironic the big backs look better outside, and MJD is the inside runner.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 21, 2009 3:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll take a stab here...

I think what Collin is saying, is that in most or in all short down and distance use the people we have signed to big contracts to move the ball. Don’t get fancy just impose your will on the opposing team. Which is to say…“RUN THE DAMN BALL!!!!!”

Atleast, that’s what I think he was trying to say.

by JagsCub on Oct 19, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha.... Right on Brother!

Run the damn ball indeed… Get the SURE first down. You can’t tell me that at the thirty yard line on 2nd and short, we couldn’t have gotten a first with three runs (even on fourth down). Instead we take a sack and leave points on the field and time on the clock.

Run to control the tempo, run to control the line of scrimmage, run to control the clock, and run to control the opposing team’s offense

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I agree with this concept

I honestly don’t believe the offensive line isn’t there yet this season.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree that Greg Jones and Jennings need to be more involved, especially with all the money being paid to a fullback.

I don’t think I agree that this is a running team anymore. This team is whatever it can be every week. It wasn’t a running team that destroyed the Titans a couple weeks ago. A young offensive lineman should technically have an easier time understanding run blocking than pass blocking, but a dominant running game requires a united surge. This line this year doesn’t have that unity yet, hence a weaker surge, hence the necessity of passing even to open the running game. It’s not a coincidence that the run didn’t work in the first half but did work in the second half.

In Gene We Trust.

by MoveThoseChains on Oct 19, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do have to say though, at least once, I saw us run the ball on

like 2nd and 1 or 2. We gave the ball to MJD and he ran backwards and then it was 3rd and 7. Doesn’t always exist as a sure thing.

by Blair72 on Oct 19, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

But the money hes gettin paid he should hit it 40 times at least and not be tired at all

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not getting

paid that much. In comparison to a lot of other positions, RB’s don’t get paid as much, so just because he’s getting paid like a top 5 back, doesn’t mean he’s getting paid a tremendous amount in comparison to QB’s or even Left Tackles.

 Also, I don’t think you realize how many rushes 40/game is. That works out to 640 rushes on the season, which is well well well above any back ever. Also keep in mind, that just because he’s not rushing the ball, that doesn’t mean he’s not touching the ball like in the passing game or on returns in special situations. And even if he’s not catching or running with the ball that doesn’t mean he’s not being productive blocking. I saw a couple of times where he even looked like a LT blocking with their technique.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 21, 2009 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two quick points ...

There was nothing wrong with the call that went pick-6 against us … it was just a poor decision by David. He could have gone to the left, lofted it higher or thrown it away, but he opted for none of the above and threw the pick. And a pass like that really is a running play, just a different way of getting it to the RB.

And I agree COMPLETELY with those espousing that others carry the ball. Jennings won’t get better until he gets some carries. Jones hasn’t been given the chance to be what they hoped he could be, at least not in the regular season. They have got to give MoJo some rest along the way.

Can’t tell you all how much I enjoy this site and the intelligent and informed discussions that dominate … it’s like listening to Tim Ryan and Pat Kerwin on Sirius … I always learn something. Thank you.

by ruffdaddy on Oct 19, 2009 4:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If you like the site - you will love the radio program

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 19, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You will be there this week Terry?

can’t wait to conncet a voice the your wisdom!

Life without knowledge is death in disguise

by Zoltan from Budapest on Oct 19, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 7:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

I try to be awakew, and posting listening live and posting comments.
Wendesday late night have a reaaaaaly good Jaguars radio line-up:
JTW (Vic; Jeff ; Brian) Then BCC Radio (Chris; Terry; John; Collin) WOOOOW!

Life without knowledge is death in disguise

by Zoltan from Budapest on Oct 20, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah - only problem is that Vic won't discuss football - he monopolizes that show

with crap – especially his soap box about attendance or useless conversations about the movies that seem to never end and carry on through the next show break. That show has become horrid. I’ve stopped listening to that show because it’s about 15 minutes football and 1hr 45 minutes of crap.

by OGN on Oct 20, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He not counting

himself a good radioguy, but I like him. He is a reaaal firecracker, I like him as a radioguy though.

Life without knowledge is death in disguise

by Zoltan from Budapest on Oct 20, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My two cents

I have been reading this blog for a while and I enjoy seeing what people have to say most of the time. When I read this rant I knew something that was said seemed off to me. “Please, Dirk, break tendencies every once in a while. We didn’t run the ball out of a single back set the entire game.” I watched it from my seat in the stadium and then watched the tape today, 7 times we ran the ball out of single back sets, 4 were ran from shotgun formation. Just wanted to clarify this before the OC gets put completely on blast. I think besides the Seattle game he has actually called a descent game I’d give him a low B.

by Pocket Hercules32 on Oct 19, 2009 5:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hmmmm

Did you watch the game from your seat really? Or from the field and sideline? Lol, you know know.

by Blair72 on Oct 19, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm thinking the same

He wasn’t seated during most of the game. If he is who he says and gives a B- that would explain the “don’t give up on the run” comments.

 - too funny!

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 19, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

2nd and short on that interception to Little?

Get it straight, it was 2nd and 10. How in the world do you put the blame on Dirk. Give credit to Little, he made a move towards David then dropped back and made a great play. Wasn’t everyone just praising him for his brilliant play calling a few weeks ago? We just won yesterday, I want ot hear some positive stuff not this negative nonsense that we usually have to hear,

by fortzj on Oct 19, 2009 5:11 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Best OC since Mike Smith

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Flavour of the Day is Turf. - Courtesy of the Jacksonville Jaguars
Keeper of the "That's what she said"

by TheTealDeal on Oct 19, 2009 6:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I see your points Collin

And I’d tend to agree with you, seeing as I love a traditional running offense between the tackles.

That said, I find it hard to criticize an offensive coordinator who’s team just put up 500 yards of offense and if it had not been for a few untimely turnovers, would have translated to at least 30 points. As long as the Jaguar offense continues to produce, I’m going to be inclined to think that Dirk is at least doing well enough to earn a B.

by SoCalStites on Oct 19, 2009 6:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think a point that needs to be clarified - and has been touched on within this thread

“On the pick-six play, Greg Jones was the single back in the play (2nd and short). It was after a substantial run by MJD, and rather than run a play-action pass, we run a flare to Greg Jones, which is intercepted because Leonard Little didn’t even play the run on that play. He saw a single-back set, and Greg Jones (who rarely gets the ball), and he played Greg for the pass the whole way, which led to his interception and subsequent TD return.”

The premise of this paragraph is completely wrong.

It was 2nd and 10 after MJD ran for no gain on first down.

In fact, that possession consisted of these plays prior to the pick 6
- MJD up the middle for 3 yards
- Pass to MSW for 1 yard
- Defensive pass interference 11 yards
- MJD up the middle for no gain.
- BAD PASS TD STL.

And watch the replay. Garrard simply threw the pass too quickly. Had he waited I feel confident that G. Jones would’ve gotten separation and the play gone for a first down at least.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 8:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't recall he had time to wait

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just watched it again.

There was nobody within 5 yards of him when he let go of the ball and that guy starts pursuit when he figures out the play so had David pulled the ball down, he’d had time to make another decision. He also releases the ball while he’s still running away from the LOS and never actually sets his feet. The fault with this play is all on DG.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2009101802/2009/REG6/rams@jaguars#tab:watch

by pksiv on Oct 20, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Disagree

Completely with your article. What I was going to say had been already stated above by various blog members. But I do have a few quick points…
-Like someone mentioned above, Drew had 8 carries for 11 yards in the first half. I would be turning to the pass as well, in fact, I would throw the gameplan in the garbage and open up the shotgun.
-I play defensive back for my JV team, but I’ve played some scout team quarterback before. We run the spread, so all shotgun. You don’t have to look to receive the ball. Football players are athletes, they can place their hands on a ball without staring at it.
-32 carries, 107 yards, 3.3 average. Thats what the rushing totals of Jones-Drew would have been had he not had that 26 yard scamper late in the game to pad his stats.
-The running game under Jones-Drew averaged 4.0. The passing game averaged 7.8 yards per attempt. Which was working better?
-A screen pass is about the safest pass play you can call. All Dirk was trying to do was pick up yardage and keep the ball moving, I mean, how often does a screen pass go incomplete? Plus, you were corrected above, it was 2nd and 10. If you run the ball and get the normal 2 yards we averaged most often running the ball, low and behold, your in third and long.
-And he doesn’t get cute for his own good. Explain how Jones-Drew gets three straight carries inside the 3, finally getting a touchdown on the third, as he was stuffed the first two times. Obviously Drew doesn’t get every short yardage situation like you said above.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Oct 19, 2009 8:54 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

A lot of people are missing something...

…It’s funny how people are still calling the Jaguars a run first team. This is exactly what Jack was talking about when he said he doesn’t want to label his team as anything. It’s even funnier that people are saying we’re not playing to the strength of the roster, when this year, we’re carrying an extra receiver just so we can pass more. Raise your hand if you thought the Jaguars would run the ball they way they used to when they let Fred go, then picked up Torry Holt, Jarrett Dilard, Mike Thomas, and Tiquan Underwood.

To win in this league, you have to evolve. We should know this first hand. Look at our record against the two passing teams in our division. It’s not good. And to make the playoffs you have to win the division. Run the ball, stop the run only works if you have the 08 Titans defense. In this division, and especially with our defense, you’re gonna have to put up points. That means passing the ball more.

For this game, you can’t argue with 500 yards and 33 first downs. That’s video game numbers right there. If the defense had a clue how to play ball, this thread wouldn’t exist.

by moufpuncha on Oct 19, 2009 9:51 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

+100

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Oct 19, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well Said

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Oct 19, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Flavour of the Day is Turf. - Courtesy of the Jacksonville Jaguars
Keeper of the "That's what she said"

by TheTealDeal on Oct 20, 2009 7:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

me too +1 whats funny is I thought JDR was gonna concentrate on defense…proves I think he is the weak link

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We need

some pass rushers, without them, the whole defense suffers.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 21, 2009 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

61% of responders have him graded as average or worse on the poll right now...

that’s exactly what our record is since he came along… a perfect .500

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 19, 2009 10:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

any response to he fact that some of you're points

used flat out incorrect information ?

And I certainly hope you’re not going to suggest the team bow to the collective opinion of the fan base. Unless of course you want every coach fired and the team to trade their entire draft for Tim Tebow.

by pksiv on Oct 19, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Joke

The typical Jaguars fan isn’t someone who I would want voting on this franchises future.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Oct 19, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Both comments are completely out of line

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is it out of line ?

The article does use incorrect information to make a point.

And I’m sure we can look back at articles posted on this site after week 2 and find plenty of people who wanted JDR fired and there was so much Tim Tebow talk that even Weaver had to address it.

by pksiv on Oct 20, 2009 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You and BestJagFan are getting out of line
suggest the team bow to the collective opinion of the fan base. Unless of course you want every coach fired and the team to trade their entire draft for Tim Tebow

Collin wrote an intelligent piece and you both respond with innane comments like that.

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree he wrote an intelligent piece and I enjoyed reading it

I don’t agree with much of it and felt that the only way to have an intelligent discussion about it was to make sure that everyone was aware of the fact that he used incorrect information in at least 1 of his points.

As for the comment you’ve highlighted above, that certainly wasn’t directed at the article. Rather at his attempt to sidestep the facts by saying “61% of the responders….” essentially agree with him.

Which again, is more or less wrong since, as someone else has pointed out – 69% think he’s average or better.

I’d love to see a poll for our intelligent readers which asks this question.

- Who’s to blame for the 3-3 record this season.
a) the OC.
b) the defense

by pksiv on Oct 20, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is a good discussion point.

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

see below, and please don't put words in my mouth...

I stand up for del rio, in fact, I’m the only editor here who says he shouldn’t be fired. Please don’t participate in discussions and put words in my mouth if you either

A: Don’t know my opinion
or
B: Are ignorantly trying to slam me.

Neither is appreciated PK. Why don’t you write something up, and if you can properly punctuate and spell, then I’ll front page it.

BTW… I would take the votes of the readers of this site over any other fans… this is the most educated group of Jags fans around, so yeah, I take it to heart when 60% say he ’s average or worse… sorry buddy.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 20, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I'm not

But people are voting in this thread because of information that you provided which was in fact, wrong.

I seriously don’t understand an article that bashes the OC when statistically it was one of the best offensive games in Jaguars history and regardless of who’s opinion that is, I just don’t get it. The turnovers weren’t the OC’s fault. Maurice fumbled the ball, David had a pass tipped, and I’m sorry but a screen pass on 2nd and 10 after going nowhere running on 1st and 10 against a defense playing selling out against the run isn’t a bad play call. Throwing the pick 6 is bad execution.

And while I agree we have a great number of knowledgeable fans on this site, many of them would have fired JDR after the 2nd game had we left it up to a vote. My comment above was directed at the polling fan-base, not you specifically.

by pksiv on Oct 20, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're being an idiot... how many three and outs did our defense force yesterday, in addittion to a turnover...

so please don’t try to blame it on the defense… they held Peyton Manning to his lowest point total of the year too. They’re inconsistent, but flash greatness. They’re not losing games for us, and they didn’t almost lose this one… please snap out of whatever dreamworld you’re living in.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 20, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just for the record

… the correct answer is 2. Our D forced 2 three and outs against the Rams.

The D has let us down in some games this year, but they played pretty damn well against the Rams. In fact, given how poorly our O performed in the 1st half against the Rams you could argue that the only reason we were still in the game at half time was because of our D. The second half was where the offense started to perform.

by KeithG on Oct 20, 2009 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What happened after the Jaguars scored to take the lead late in the 4th quarter ?

It took the Rams less than 2 minutes and only 6 plays drive down to the 9 yard line where they finally stepped up on 3 plays and were able to force them only to kick the game-tying FG.

That is all on the defense.

by pksiv on Oct 20, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As soon as we scored I said "We are going to overtime"

People looked at me like I was a traitor, but one minute later they changed their tune.

Our defense looks good but in crunch time the offense did it, the defense didn’t. Our best defense play was winning the coin toss.

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What are you saying?

That Dirk is the reason for this teams failures? In 2007, weren’t we known more for our offense that kept the ball away from opposing teams. In 2008, didn’t Garrard nearly throw for 4,000 yards despite having the third worst offensive line in the league. And this year haven’t the passing game topped 300 yards twice in five games, it seems we are more of a passing team now and we are in the top ten in total offense.

What more do you want from Dirk?

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Oct 19, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The fun part about statistics is that

I can also correctly say that 69% say Koetter’s doing an average or better job.

In Gene We Trust.

by MoveThoseChains on Oct 20, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny

Thats also JDR record

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok... obviously a heated discussion, and I"m happy this has generated so much interest.

To PKSIV…… stop being so irate and defensive. Yes, I rewatched the tape, and I was wrong about the distance. I was, however, right about it being the fourth quarter with a lead and the ball… The Ball shouldn’t have been in the air on that play unless it was a play action pass.

As for Dirk, anyone who frequents this site with any sort of regularity knows I’ve praised him when he’s called good games, and I’ve called him out on bad calls. Just because we won this game doesn’t mean all the calls were great calls… Please take the teal glasses off and look at the facts…. How many 3 and outs did we have yesterday… the game shouldn’t have gone to overtime because we should’ve gotten a field goal when we had the ball on second and short at the 30 yard line…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 20, 2009 12:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

*how many three and outs did the defense force, is what I meant.

The offense had the ball and the opportunities, but poor play calling led to failure…

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 20, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Jaguars had far less 3 and outs than conversions

11 for 16 on 3rd down will generally indicate a successful game.

I understand what you’re trying to say, Collin, but I think you picked the wrong game to pick a fight. Koetter did too many things right this game.

In Gene We Trust.

by MoveThoseChains on Oct 20, 2009 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

didn't you see my comment... I said how many 3 and outs the defense forced yesterday

not how many we had. the problem yesterday was leaving points on the field, and not running with the lead in the fourth with under 5 minutes to play.

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 20, 2009 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's still

a good stat, in favor of Koetter that is. haha

In reality, I’m not sure you could claim anyone wrong in this discussion. It’s kind of opinion based argument after an overall good offensive showing.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 3:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry but I'm not irate or even heated.

I don’t let discussion like this get to me in the slightest. I just don’t see how you can bash the OC when they put up huge yards and had it not been for 2 execution failures by MDJ ad DG, the score would’ve reflected that.

And I still contend our defense stinks. We were playing STL who has been shut out several times this year and tell me you wouldn’t have been concerned had they won the coin-toss in OT ?

by pksiv on Oct 20, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

When watching I knew the winner would be who won the coin toss….

Our defense is terrible…

and Jag fans are hilarious if you think Cox is worth a second round pick if you look who hes covered this year and their stats…Im sorry dont give me the rookie stuff either…you got it or you dont….hes descent but for a second rounder its like Gene use a lifeline and called Shack Harris and asked him what to do…

by kingsmasher on Oct 20, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Way wrong

on so many levels

Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!

by Tkopa on Oct 20, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you serious

of all the CB’s drafted this year, Derek might be performing the best. I think of like 7 or so CB’s drafted above him he’s one of 2 that are starting, and he by far has the most tackles; some of which were not even because of him being targeted. This can be seen by the number of tackles within 5 yds of the line of scrimmage. And none of the other CB’s have as many turn overs.
Also look at the pass rush Derek has had to work with, and the receivers he’s had to face. Reggie Wayne really? Steve Breaston/Anquan Boldin?

by Ewdtrey on Oct 21, 2009 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

An eye for an eye or turn the other cheek?

Because they’re both in the bible. How you translate it is up to. What I’m saying is there’s no right or wrong way to win a game. Nazeem Richardson always says that if you get in the ring and win, no one can say you did something wrong. If you go in there and lose, than obviously you did something wrong.

Silence, i see what you’re saying and I agree. With the the backs we have we should have run it right at them. However, you can also make a point the other way. You line up to run, they line up to stop the run. What happens if they stop you and you have to punt? 5 minutes of watching our dreadful defense get sliced for a game winning touchdown.

When these guys are coaching they’re also trying to stay away from dominating tendencies. If everybody in the house knows your running it, a pass might be the best way for you to move the ball. The bad pass should have been on David. That was a horrible read. Almost like he had that route picked out before the snap and was gonna throw it no matter what.

by moufpuncha on Oct 20, 2009 2:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I seem to remember

beating the Steelers in the playoff after they got too conservative on offense, when they could have probably passed the ball to keep the drive and lead.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 4:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but...

This is a different team, in a different situation, and that play was a once in a lifetime missed tackle.

by moufpuncha on Oct 20, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love this site

On most message boards, this would have devolved into a flame war and name calling. While the discussion is a bit heated, it is also a very informative one. Right or wrong.

I believe that we just had some stupid mistakes that kept the Rams in the game. I believe it was the players, and not the plays. I also believe we still can’t know anything definitive about this team, yet. We don’t really have a good performance against a solid team to gauge ourselves (except for the Dolts, but that was opening day, and they can say some of the same things we’re saying now).

by Pyrofish on Oct 20, 2009 9:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

2nd and 10

I feel like not enough has been made of the fact that it was 2nd and 10 when Garrard threw that pick-six rather than the 2nd and short Collin claims…

by tdhedrick on Oct 20, 2009 10:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it's been noted in the comments mon frere...

I still say run the ball with the lead and the clock, and your best player is MJD

The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com

by silencecs on Oct 20, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Been trying to stay out of this as long as I can

I think this goes back a discussion we had last week on BCC radio (Tomorrow night and every Wednesday night at 11pm) when talking about MSW and the offense. The offense has been evolving, and this is the kind of offense you saw from Arizona St when Koetter was the HC there.

This team is 3-3, and is doing that without any semblance of a pass defense.

by Jonathan Loesche on Oct 20, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

"This team is 3-3, and is doing that without any semblance of a pass defense."

It’s a modern-day miracle, and the offense has to take credit for it, including the coordinator. Clearly he’s doing something right.

In Gene We Trust.

by MoveThoseChains on Oct 20, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not

the same offense as that at ASU, but it’s still evolving that way. That offense is a lot opened up. Lots of risky plays involved.

by Ewdtrey on Oct 20, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Cat Country:: Jacksonville Jaguars news, commentary, speculation and fun, all from a fan's perspective
Start posting about the Jaguars »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
2010 Free Agency
Small
Visually Heard / Jaguars Maurice Jones Drew Vizio Profile -
Jacksonvillejaguars2_small
2011
Mauricejonesdrew_small
Holt and Thomas to be released
Mauricejonesdrew_small
Rufio904's Pre Combine Mock Draft
Jag3_small
Wow! Thanks for Posting my Picture at the ProBowl!
Mjd_small
Scouting Report: Dan LeFevour
Sgtschmidt_small
Why Fred Taylor isn't an All Pro
The-teal-deal_medium_small
Jaguars Final Draft Summary at SBN's MockingtheDraft.com
91422495_small
Senior Bowl Thoughts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

The Falcoholic
Hat Contest Winner #3 - Dirtybird915
Windy City Gridiron
The Bears Den: 02/10/2010
Gang Green Nation
Torry Holt: Pursue or No?

Founder

Delriosad_small River City Rage

Editor-in-Chief

Img_6121_small silencecs

South_park_avatar_small Jonathan Loesche

Associate Editor

Pict0319_small Tkopa

Brian_small bwfull

Cheerleader_small SoCalStites