Here is why I'm pretty sure Garrard is a very good Qb
Picture via sports.espn.go.com
I'm bored of reading all this "Hot seat List" articles and that kind of stuff that usually just reads that David Garrard is just not living up to his contract. I'm bored and bothered by this articles not just because I don't think that's the case, but because I think the guys that write them won't even bother to research a bit.
That is why I present to you my main argument to why David is a pretty good Qb.
Recently the Jaguars offense has characterized itself by presenting year in year out a very competitive running game as well as a high Time of Possession and a total ground attack focus.
This reached its peak in 2007, where a very competitive offense combined itself with a decent defense to take the Jaguars on the road to New England where the team fell honorably to the best offense in the history of the NFL.
However in 2008 devastating injuries to the team resulted in a 5-11 record when 97% of the fanbase expected the team to reach easlity the playoffs.........
Many people blamed David before the OL, because he was not able to maintain his inhuman Td:Int Ratio.
And we could bring here an analysis involving passing yards, Tds, attempts, rating etc, but that really does not show me anything else than group performance.
That is why I think I can make a case using YAC and 1st Downs achieved.
In 2007 when the team had a dominant OL, a dominant Running game, a decent defense and an underperforming Wr and Te corp the jaguars found a way to put themselves near the top in TOP, 1st downs per game, and actually had the leader in YAC for the AFC south.
And such success is easily attributed to the fact that Garrard used to throw the ball with 8 guys crowding the box, That is why the time that our big receivers needed to gain separation was granted by good protection, and our running game pounded the opposite defenders, resulting in being the 4th team with the most 1st down a game.. with nearly 21 1st downs........ Garrard committed nearly no errors and finished with an inhuman Td:Int ratio and a passer rating of more than 100.
Also the team had the ability to make big plays, making 80 yard its longest rushing play and 60 yards its longest passing play..........
but what happened in 2008??
The team ended with 5-11 far away from leading or being amongst the leaders in Total yardage, Tds, rushing or passing yards, they where also the team with the shortest long play in the NFL, the YAC of our Wr corp where vomitable, the team passed from being one of the least penalyzed to being one of the most penalyzed in the entire NFL, amongs other calamities.
But.......
Te team managed to still be amongst the leaders both in TOP and 1st downs achieved in the league just 1 less than 2007.
So what happened???
To me this shows me that David Garrard was in control of this offense both in 2007 and in 2008, even without the legs of this offense (who does'nt remember the games where fred or Maurice had less than 10 rush attemps?) the jaguars signal caller was able to mantain the jags amongst the leading teams in TOP and 1st down achieved.
And even though the team had just 1 less 1st down a game in average, the inability to produce any big yardage plays doomed the jaguars offensive hopes. This lack of big yardage plays came from the inability of the OL both to open gaps for the Rbs and the lack of protection for DG....... Then you have the under-achieving defense and then of course the worst WR corp of the NFL (non of the starting Wr of 2008 can or are going to find a place to play in 2009), that is why the YAC reduced so much from 2007 to 2008.
And even with all this DG was able to put us in position to win the game in each and every one of the first 8 games of 2008 where the jaguars had the lead in the 4th Quarter in each game and our Defense was unable to mantain it in all but 7 of those (cause vs the Colts and the Texans we won in final drives)....... All this with a weak Rushing game and most of the times throwing against 4 or 5 men in the secondary..........
I really cant understand when people say he was not living up to his contract when his contract is not as big as bigger under achievers like Carson Palmer or Marc Bulger. Or that he is in the hot seat, when even last year in that fractured offense he ended up delivering..........
If you've seen all the Jaguars games for 3 seasons you (like me) can see that DG owns this offense, that he controls the times, the pase, the ball, the momentum............ That he is the leader in this offense, that the guys will play for him, and that he will play for the guys......... Now with the commitment he has shown with the weight loss and the workout, and having shown he can pass the ball, I'm very confident tha the Offense will be pretty mean next year.......
jaxjags..
PS: Pardon my under-achieving writing skills.....
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
I agree with you
He is I think a good QB. BUT: I wait with the final verdict with this season.
He know get the line, protection what he was lacking last year. Receivers, who can make play was a hiatus recently, but now it seems thatr problem is solved too.
The running game is a bit question, but I think Greg Jones, Jennings (and maybe Washington and Owens) can fill a bit the space what Fred’s move to New England left.
So, I trust on David, but if no major injuries happens, he must have a year similar to 2007! And he need to be that good, cause this year offense must be the calling card for the Jaguars(specialy if we see how parts of the defense looking right now…).
by Zoltan from Budapest on Jun 15, 2009 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And if Garrard can't go back to 2007 form,
There’s always the draft to get a “replacement”.
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
by TheTealDeal on Jun 15, 2009 8:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rooks
IF our rookies can come in and make an impact and our oline holds up then I think David w/have a good year. If the rooks don’t make an impact that leaves Holt to pick up the slack and I’m not so sure he can do it all on his own.
by kickandsnare07 on Jun 15, 2009 9:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Other than Peyton Manning, no one really does much without YAC.
Think about Tom Brady, those slant passes and dump offs (Wes Welker’s YAC is 6.8 yards). It’s the receivers who get QBs their yards. Even Manning is questionable without YAC, seeing as how Marvin Harrison did, and Reggie Wayne does, have very respectable YAC numbers. For example, Reggie Wayne averaged 14 yards per catch, and 4.1 yards after catch. That means a third of his yards came after the catch. If a team’s receivers all had similar yards per catch and YAC, that’s the difference between the QB throwing 3000 yards and 4500 yards. That’s the difference between average and hall of fame numbers. It’s insane. Similarly, Dallas Clark averaged 11 yards per catch, with 4.9 of those being YAC, while Anthony Gonzalez averaged 11.6 with a 3.4 YAC. Basically, if receivers can catch, most QBs can put up three of four thousand yard seasons.
One other interesting fact is that RBs tend to have much higher YACs, since they’re assessed from where the ball was caught, not from the line of scrimmage. In the RB’s case, this is often in the back field, with no defenders in sight.
by Kbot on Jun 15, 2009 9:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dallas Clark
He could be one of the best YAC tight ends in the league. I saw some run after the catch skills from Marcedes last year… hopefully he can put that together again and score more than two touchdowns this season.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
by Bestjagfan on Jun 16, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I hope so too.
Also, I finally understand why Bo Scaife was franchised. His YAC is 6.5 yards and averaged 9.7 yards per catch. That means he might be the ultimate security blanket. Impressive.
by Kbot on Jun 16, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he averaged about 40 yac week 1 last year
Surreal to be Teal
by Surteal on Jun 17, 2009 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we all
witnessed that disaster, unfortunately .
by Ewdtrey on Jun 17, 2009 4:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















