Return to Glory: Wil(ford) or won't we

Might we see a return to teal for our man Wilford?
As some of you know, Ernest Wilford is on the hot seat in Miami. He's struggled ever since leaving Jacksonville and signing a relatively big contract with the dolphins. Well, last season was a debacle for Wilford, seeing him slip to the bottom of the depth chart. The only reason he stayed around last year was his HUGE first year cap number. Well, apparently, the Phins' patients is wearing thin. They are trying Wilford out at TE, but it seems the competition may be too stiff for him there even. Here's what PFT had to say via reports from our southernmost neighbors.
Even With New Position, Wilford Might Not Make It In Miami
Per Salguero, Wilford won't make it into the final 53-man roster, absent injuries to or ineffectiveness of others who are expected to earn spots on the depth chart.
Specifically, Wilford needs tight end David Martin to struggle in his return from hernia surgery and/or rookie tight end John Nalbone to continue to display hands like, well, Wilford's. Alternatively, Wilford needs rookie receivers Patrick Turner and/or Brian Hartline to rupture multiple knee ligaments.
Absent one or more of such developments, Wilford will find himself looking for a new team come the next three-day weekend of the summer of 2009.
When I read this, I immediately became excited. I know Jacksonville is in a youth movement, but Wilford is still on the right side of 30, and he's a proven commodity in Jacksonville. He's got a rapport with David, and he's got great hands and route running ability. I'm still astonished he hasn't caught on in Miami, but it looks like he won't make the cut this season.
This raises the question as to whether or not the Jags should bring Wilford back for another season with the team. He could sign a one or two year "prove-it" contract, enabling both sides to reap the benefits of such a deal. Wilford could prove he can still play in the league, and potentially secure another FA payday in the future, and the Jags would have a proven commodity who isn't injury riddled (ahem, Mike Walker) to go along with Holt. I think it's a good idea on the surface, and Dirk Koetter was the offensive coordinator when Wilford was here last, so picking the offense up shouldn't be much of a problem for him.
One of our WR's will get injured and miss multiple games... I guarantee it. Holt is over 30, and has an iffy knee. Granted, he hasn't missed many games over his career, but the older a player gets, the more likely he is to get injured. Our rookies aren't acclimated to an NFL season yet, and often times their bodies can't take the punishment of a 20 game schedule, so look for one of them to bite the dust for a period of time this season as well. Then there's Troy (Patron') Williamson, who picks up soft tissue injuries like he's stopping to buy groceries. I'm sorry, but he's not a guy I would count on throughout a season. Let's not forget about Mike Walker and his amazing bionic knees, which give out if he's bumped by a large enough dog, or if he bangs them against a table. We have NO security at the WR position, which is why I think we should grab Wilford if he's dumped by the Dolphins, which it appears he will be.
I think it is imperitive the Jaguars have more than 1 player who's completed a full 20 game season, and right now, Torry Holt is the only one. Wilford would bring stability, leadership, good hands, and reliability. Not to mention a decent red-zone target at 6'4"
Will we or won't we?
-Collin Streetman
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
IMO This article is right on target
You correctly point out that David is/was comfortable with Wilford. This is a point that gets missed a lot. David needs a rapport with his receivers and last years debacle and loss of the offensive line wasn’t helped with the loss of Ernest Wilford.
Something is wrong in Miami because Ernest Wilford is a tough over the middle third down receiver. I swear he accounted for the bulk of the “stay alive” plays when the Jagurs could march down the field for long scores. This is a job Marcedes should have filled and never did.
The only question I have is now that he has his money, is he interested in putting his body on the line for what will look like minimum wage to him.
Once again, nice job Collin. This article in very subtle ways hit on a bunch of major points.
Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!
by Tkopa on Jul 6, 2009 6:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh, who would he have a realistic shot of taking a spot from? Troy Williamson?
Wilford was good while he was a Jag, but what does he offer that we couldn’t get from any other WR cut after training camp?
"The worst kind of non-smokers are the ones that come up to you and cough. That's pretty cruel isn't it? Do you go up to cripples and dance too?"-Bill Hicks
Currently Playing:
PS3-inFamous/NHL 09
360-Grand Theft Auto 4
by FSBlueApocalypse on Jul 6, 2009 7:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What does Wilford offer different than any other cut WR?
I think Collin covered that fairly well.
1) A productive history within the Jaguar system
2) Knowledge of the system
3) Chemistry with the QB
Ernest Wilford deserves respect for what he accomplished here in Jacksonville.
As for a spot on the team, that is a legitimate question, but one that will be answered in training camp with performance. All of the rookies signed have not been voted to the Pro Bowl yet. Mike Walker only every flashed briefly and Troy Williamson doesn’t have a history of high NFL productivity.
To me, there is plenty of room for players to play into this roster. More so this year than in any other year. I will say the preference and hope is with the younger players, but that is yet to be shown.
- Terry
Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!
by Tkopa on Jul 6, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't forget he isn't injury prone.. and he actually catches the ball...
The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com
by silencecs on Jul 7, 2009 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
with john on this one. I don’t think it is a good idea. If he becoming a FA, and the young WRs not őproduce wqell in the first games, I might sign him, but until that, I don’t think, he has a shot. Wy would they trade Dennis if they need a WR.
by Zoltan from Budapest on Jul 6, 2009 9:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dennis Northcutt was scheduled to make $2.7 million
Most FA contracts are back loaded. Dennis got his guaranteed money up front and then an escalating salary each year. His price vs value was out of line for the Jaguars.
He is happy to go to Detroit because he gets to make $2.7 million. Without Detroit, he wouldn’t command that salary.
Would Ernest Wilford require $2.7 million? I doubt it.
Don’t forget, a #8 draft choice, David and MJD carry a hefty price tag. All top salary individuals wil go under the microscope for value verses price.
Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!
by Tkopa on Jul 6, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not enough spots
We already have 10 receivers on the roster and only keep about 5 (Holt, Thomas, Walker, Dillard, Underwood) Wilford was never anything more than a possession receiver anyway which im sure we already have on the roster
by mranderson83 on Jul 6, 2009 10:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think Underwood is a lock?
Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!
by Tkopa on Jul 6, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has way more potential than either williamson or wilford
by mranderson83 on Jul 6, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not more than
Williamson. But yes more than Wilford.
I’m not saying Underwood wont be better than Williamson, but he doesn’t have Williamson’s upside.
by Ewdtrey on Jul 6, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
If Williamson could put it all together, he could be a borderline number 1 receiver; at least a number 2
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
by Bestjagfan on Jul 6, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Listen you honers... (its late, and I'm have ing a bad night...)
Troy Williamson IS, HAS, AND WILL LIKELY CONTINUE TO BE… Garbage….
He drops passes, he has a knack for injuries, and there is a reason he rarely caught a pass…
Stop living off that one long bomb that was called back from a hold…. just stop it… all of you.
Underwood may not even make the team, we haven’t seen them in pads, and you guys are comparing them to #1 and # 2 receivers over a proven veteran who can take Matt Jones place as a nice third down receiver….
I’m not saying it’ll work defibitely, but I thought it was interesting given the absolute injury riddled, stone handed, TRASH that currently makes up our WR’s… (except Holt, he’s just old)
The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com
by silencecs on Jul 7, 2009 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i loved wilford
he was one of my favorites….everytime we needed a play. “sure-hands” caught it on third down. He was like our lesser anquan boldin. tough.
but, the problem here is the dedication to youth movement. When I first read that piece on PFT, i thought “YES!”, then i had to calm down because my internal fanatic was overshadowing my internal GM.
Colin, it is a great idea. If nothing else, sign him for cheap and “let the best man win”. Although, I personally feel that he will not even receive and exploratory phone call. We seem to be dedicated to player development. I do not think Underwood is a lock, but i do not know if Wilford would be either.
On another note, i really feel like Williamson could get a lot better this season. No drops last year. He may have raport this year with David-which as a few of you pointed out is very important. I mentioned early in the off-season with an article talking about the rise of Garrard. He needs to trust those WR’s. I think he will this year, because they are going to catch more than jail time.
We should all have at least one reason to want Wilford back. If nothing else than the great locker room chemistry, but I just don’t think it happens. too bad, but maybe in November we’ll be happy with these guys…or maybe not.
LateRoundPick.com
by Surteal on Jul 6, 2009 12:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Stop gap... Rookies won't solve all our problems... I promise you that.
The End Is Nigh... www.infowars.com
by silencecs on Jul 7, 2009 3:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
blah. we let him go for a reason. stick with the youth movement. he offers no major upside. key word being “major”.
Sean Jax Beach Bum
by cuffs007 on Jul 6, 2009 4:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Better than what Jax has
Right now Jax has two very unproven rookies, a handless wonder, an aging receiver with probable injury problems this season, a second year guy with just over 200yds, and another with nothing to show statistically. Now how are you all sitting back comfortably?
What in those players makes you think… gee… we’re looking good where we stand?
Bringing back a guy that should have never been allowed to leave JVille is a no brainer. If I had to cut someone to make room, you know it’d be Williamson. In his four year career he has failed to amass more than 500yds and more than 2TD’s. So why are you all so sure he’s a go-to guy? Potential is one thing, reality doesn’t always side with it.
Bring back a known good go-to guy, and the only good WR Jax has had in the past five years or more. It was a HUGE mistake bringing in Porter, and I said that all along. Not bringing back Wilford would be another.
by CanesMania on Jul 6, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Per season...
Those stats for Williamson are per season.
by CanesMania on Jul 6, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i wonder "what if he was actually a good TE?"
LateRoundPick.com
by Surteal on Jul 7, 2009 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not like if he made the transition
he would be any more productive. And he wouldn’t be the blocker Estandia, Lewis, or Angulo are. And with Miller’s size I doubt Wilford would be as good as him at blocking.
If you want a guy tough guy going over the middle I don’t think you have to look any further than Marcedes Leiws. He had a rough start to the season, but he didn’t do as bad as some people think. And by the end of the year he was actually pretty good. He stopped dropping passes. I just think he had a bad spell. He never had trouble in college. He also didn’t have trouble in his first 2 years with his hands.
by Ewdtrey on Jul 7, 2009 2:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















