David Garrard set to throw franchise record touchdowns
Being one of David Garrard's harshest critics, I also consider myself fair. Garrard has played excellent in his last three of four ball games. He struggled on Monday Night Football against a very good Tennessee Titans defense and wound up leaving early with a concussion, but since coming back he's been playing at another level. Some will point to his 2007 season for comparison, but I don't think he's playing at the 2007 season level.
He's playing better.
David Garrard has thrown 15 touchdowns through 8 games so far this season, matching his 2008 and 2009 total and only 3 shy of his 2007 season mark. In his last four games, he's thrown 8 touchdowns and only a single interception. His decision making, one of the most criticized areas, has been excellent for the most part. It's also been rather quick, too, which is another spot often criticized. He's still got his brain farts (i.e. the first drive against the Houston Texans) but as long as the Jaguars are winning and he's producing, those can be overlooked.
I wrote last week how typically Garrard has faltered down the stretch in past seasons and that still remains to be seen this year, but for now he's playing very, very well. Most will point to his quarterback rating and note it's second in the NFL. I'm one of those people however, that think quarterback rating is one of the most overrated statistics in football. One stat Garrard ranks highly in that I am a big believer in however, is yards per attempt (YPA). Garrard currently sits behind only Phillip Rivers, Michael Vick, and Ben Roethlisberger in YPA with an 8.0 average. This doesn't necessarily indicate Garrard is throwing down the field like those three are, instead he's getting chunks of yardage in the intermediate routes of 15-20 yards on a consistent basis. He's also completing 69.4% of his passes, which is behind only Drew Brees and Tony Romo.
Last season Garrard made the Pro Bowl as the 9th alternate, which lead to some jokes and spats between fans. The pro-Garrard crowd would tout he was a Pro Bowl QB, which the "anti-Garrard" (for lack of a better term) folks pointed out he went because many others before him chose not to. If Garrard continues his play this season, he might just make a legitimate Pro-Bowl. It's tough sledding in the AFC with the play of Peyton Manning, Rivers, Kyle Orton, Joe Flacco, and Tom Brady, but even as an alternate this season will be much more deserving than the last.
Currently Garrard projects to throw 28 touchdowns, 2700 yards, and 13 interceptions. Does this mean David Garrard will remain on the roster past this season and allow the Jaguars to wait on a quarterback again? I doubt the latter, but the former remains to be seen and will be determined by his play down the stretch.
15 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very nice article from a (very often correctly) Garrard critic!
Well done! But the big tests will come in the next 3-4 weeks for him. Browns; and Raiders- and espcially the Giants-Titans duo have excellent pass defense. If David will continue his run against them. He is for real in this season!
Life without knowledge is death in disguise
Follow me on twitter @iktriad
by Zoltan from Budapest on Nov 16, 2010 7:57 AM EST reply actions
Agree with Zoltan.
I generally am pro-David, especially since he’s our best option for now, but right now he’d be the best option for a lot of teams right now. I don’t have expectations for him against the tougher defenses of the coming weeks, but if he continues to play as well as he has, then he’ll have proven himself against his critics. And I’ll be especially excited, because it’ll buy our newly-drafted rookie QB more time to learn and develop before being fed to NFL defenses.
In Gene We Trust.
by MoveThoseChains on Nov 16, 2010 8:51 AM EST via mobile reply actions
another photo caption
“David Garrard was the lone Jaguar to get a hand on Matt Schaub Sunday.”
by Joe Fisher on Nov 16, 2010 9:06 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
My original thought...
was the Garrard would be kept until after the Draft and then cut if we actually found the QB of the future. The Jags would then keep Edwards and McCown and let the better of the two play until the rook was ready. The reasoning originally was Garrard was playing like crap and his contract did not dictate keeping him. Well he’s turned it around and if he keeps it up… we still go for our QBotF, but Garrard sticks with the team and plays until he can’t or goes flat again, thus giving the QBotF plenty of time to grow and develop.
Completely Agree
"I’m going to punish him. If he hits me, fine, but if I catch him, believe me, I’m going to get the better shot." - Fred Taylor
I know most see me as being in the "pro-David" camp
But in reality I’ve always just accepted that he’s our best option right now, and will probably be our best option next season while a rookie learns the ropes.
And anyone who thinks that any of the backups we’ve had on the roster this season had any chance of ever playing this well is delusional.
As for next year, I don’t care if he takes all the way to a Super Bowl win and throws 30 TD’s and no more interceptions, Gene still MUST draft a QB early next year.
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's, or LB's ability to cover a TE.
Yeah
We need some youth in that postion regardless of how well David is playing.
Coach Crennel, if all of your Coors Lights can talk what happens when you open your fridge? There's generally "Hoopla" involved.
My only comment to that.....
even though for the most part I agree with both pksiv and you, is what about Edwards. Edwards is fairly young, and if he can show some promise, and DG stays on, would fixing the secondary on defense not seem to be the best move? We will have to think about defensive ends too, though I feel Kampman will make a full recovery.
Look at it like this. The QB problem seems to be righting itself, at least for the time being. Maybe it can continue on this path and DG remains starter, and either Edwards or Luke (or both) are backups. As far as the secondary problem, I think we can all agree that it has been a concern all season. I do believe that Cox is getting back to his old self, but Mathis is becoming a bigger concern for me, and I am not confident in the safeties yet. I am just wondering is the recent (albeit current) resurgence in DG can let us fix what I Think might be the bigger problem of the secondary.
That's the question Gene Smith has to answer
Does he think that Edwards can ever be a Franchise QB for the Jaguars ?
Personally, I don’t see it which is why I trust Gene to draft the future QB this coming year. But as I’ve said over and over, even if the Jags take a QB with every pick they have, there’s no guarantee that any of them turn out to be as good as Matt Ryan appears to be.
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's, or LB's ability to cover a TE.
I agree that it is a question for Gene to answer......
but I do not think I agree with your questions. I do not know that Trent (or Luke for that matter) have to be a franchise guy, but simply a good, acceptable back up that can help get the team through the next year or so with DG at the helm, if David can keep it up. I know this is a deep class at QB position, but I am sure that Gene is also looking down the road at who is going to be there in 2012 and beyond.
There's no guarantee
any QB drafted will ever succeed so you have to take them when you can.
I’m not saying the Jaguars have to draft one in the first round, but they have to draft one.
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's, or LB's ability to cover a TE.
I feel like Edwards will move on next year
He was only added because he was thought to be a better option than Bouman after McCown went out with a knee. It’s been said by multiple people that this draft is loaded at the QB position, which makes me think that Gene Smith will defintely draft his QB this year. I also think that David would be a good mentor to a younger QB and would be a far better example on the field for a young guy then Edwards would be. I think we go 3 deep at QB next year in this order Garrard, McCown, (Insert Rookie). The needs at secondary are great, but you just can’t pass up the chance to draft your franchise QB.
Coach Crennel, if all of your Coors Lights can talk what happens when you open your fridge? There's generally "Hoopla" involved.
Im sorry, i think DG...
is playing great….But if it were me, id go with Trent starting next year, draft a Rookie, and use DG as trade bait for draftpicks to help with the Secondary…..the reality is, DG over the last couple of games has had to play at the level he has to get us the wins. If it wasnt for the Deffense giving up 30 points a game we wouldnt have to score 30 points to keep up…..The deffense needs to be solidified.
WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

by 


































