Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lakers Should Trade Andrew Bynum So He Doesn't Go To Waste

Jaguars game plan wasn't the problem against the Colts

Photo

Typically after a Jacksonville Jaguars loss, especially with one as important as the loss to the Colts on Sunday, you'll see a lot of knee-jerk hand wringing. That's natural as we're all fans and it's emotional for us. One thing that I've seen get criticized and I've gotten e-mails about is the play calling on Sunday. To be quite honest, I didn't really have any problems with the play calling. The only bad calls I can think of off the top of my head were the 4th and 1 at the 38, where David Garrard should have just checked to a quarterback sneak since the Colts left a gaping hole over center Brad Meester, but there were apparently headset problems. The other was running the option with a quarterback that has a tweaked hamstring. Maybe offensive coordinator Dirk Koetter saw Garrard rolling out and moving fine and Garrard insisted he could run it, but the one time it was ran, it resulted in a -12 yard play that was nearly a turnover deep in the Jaguars territory.

"They did a good job of stopping our run. Not too many times that will happen,' tight end Marcedes Lewis said after the game.

Star-divide

"We know that we're a really good rushing offense and that we usually have a lot of success with Indy. But they did a great job of coming out today and being very determined that they weren't going to get the ball run down their throat. They stepped up and made the plays necessary to really limit us in the run game," David Garrard told reporters after the game. David is right, it was more the Colts gameplan and execution that stifled the Jaguars running game that was running at full bore in the weeks prior. Some have complained Koetter gave up on the run, but until his hand was forced the Jaguars ran the ball plenty.

Three of the first four plays of the game were running plays. Ten of the first 16 plays were running plays. It was clear early on the Jaguars were going to do exactly what we thought they would do, run the football. The only thing that happened that most didn't think would happen is the Colts stopped it. In the first half the Jaguars passed the ball only nine times, Garrard ended the day with 38 pass attempts. That's what happens when a team falls behind by two scores, you're forced to abandon the run.

Heading into the halftime, thanks to a Mike Thomas punt return for a touchdown, the Jaguars were down only four points. The gameplan wouldn't be dictated by the score, yet. To open the second half, the Jaguars ran the ball three out of the first four plays, including the botched 4th and 1 from their own 38-yard line. "I trusted our offensive line. I trusted the quarterback. I'd do that again right now. If we're going to beat these guys, we have to be able get a hard yard when we need it," head coach Jack Del Rio said after the game.

I think we all trusted our offensive line to get the tough yard, but the problem was when that play failed... the game plan totally had to change. The Jaguars saw themselves down 21-10, they couldn't run the ball as heavily as they had in the first half, especially since the Colts were stuffing it. To Koetter, Garrard, and the Jaguars credit, they got themselves back into the game passing the football. They put themselves in position at 17-24 to tie the football game. David Garrard's interception on a potential game tying drive where he sailed the ball over Jason Hill's head was essentially the killer, though.

The 4th and 1 changed the game, the interception ended it.

Comment 22 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Big Cat Country

Jacksonville Jaguars Roundup

May 2012 by Alfie Crow - 2 comments

Jaguars Post-Draft Needs

May 2012 by Alfie Crow - 68 comments

2009 NFL Draft Re-Graded

May 2012 by Alfie Crow - 104 comments

Comments

Display:

I have one question....and i dont want it to seem like its a Garrard bash....

but i read a post on NFP, and David was talkinga bout the head set problems, but its not in him to change a play or somthing……on that 4-1….I mean that statment right there tells me A, youve been told that no matter what you see or think will work your not allowed to Audiable. or 2, arnt capable. I dont get it, i see plent of QB’s week in and week out, if they see somthings not gona work, they change it at the line of Scrimage? I just dont get it you would think after years of playing that you would be able to do that? Are they coaching staff not letting David do that? i know weve said hes a game managner and thats it, but some of these things are childs play. if you see 8-9 in the box or a run blitz coming, change the play? you get paid to do those things. I just dont get it.

WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
--George Patton--

by JaxBlaster on Dec 21, 2010 8:23 AM EST reply actions  

the quote i was talking about.
," Garrard said. "I had to switch to a different helmet. I didn’t get that part [about the quarterback sneak]. I wish I would have gotten the call. The thing is, it’s not in my head to call it. I’m just thinking of calling the play that is called

WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
--George Patton--

by JaxBlaster on Dec 21, 2010 8:25 AM EST up reply actions  

It means exactly what you think.

That’s all I’ll say.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 21, 2010 8:37 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

completely disagree

everyone is trying to turn this to an either / or situation. It isn’t. The players did not execute and play well — let me say that again – the players as a whole, did not play well. IN addition to not playing well, our game plan on offense was not creative and was not geared to exploit 8 and 9 man fronts. Effective passing on early downs (play action) was called for IMO. When we did pass it was A) in predictable circumstances and B) the same plays that were getting shut down by the Raiders the week prior – screens and tight end drag / waggle play for example.

Another point – it’s not exactly a state secret that Jordan Black has been less than steller in pass pro and that the strength of Indy’s D is their DEs. Why didn’t we start chipping earlier? It wasn’t until late in the 3rd qtr that we started chipping with Mercedes and Rashad. They would typically release into the pattern after chipping and would be wide open.

Remember the first game we played against the Colt’s – we had some innovation to our offensive game plan – and it really showed. we started running David more, we introduced reverses, etc, i.e. – we did different things and broke some tendancies — result was a W! I didn’t see any of that innovation and tendancy breaking in this game – especailly in the 1st half. There also didn;t appear to be any adjustments during the game either – not until late in the 3rd when light apparently shined on marble heads up in the pressbox.

Bottom line, we were outplayed AND outcoached on Sunday. It also doesn’t help that it appears that the entire defense has studied tackling techniques under Reggie Nelson’s expert tutelage. Game planning wasn’t THE problem, but it wasn’t part of the solution either.

by OGN on Dec 21, 2010 8:54 AM EST reply actions  

Their Team played better

than our team. Just as the Jags played better than them earlier. The Jags just seemed flat as a whole in game 2. I think that commentor in Vic’s column was right… The Raiders win came at a cost.

by Jaghomer on Dec 21, 2010 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

People complain when they “abandon the run” and people complain when they don’t “exploit 8/9 man fronts”.

Can’t win.

They ran the option and pitches. How’d those work? That’s the problem: you’re asking the offense to be gimmicky. That gimmicky stuff works only a few times.

And they passed the ball NINE times in the first half. Of course they didn’t chip till the 3rd, they threw 29 times in the second half, compared to 9. There weren’t really times to chip in the first half.

I see people keep overlooking how huge the two Colts turnovers were in the first game. Those literally took points off the board in the first game.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 21, 2010 10:10 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

+1

DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's, or LB's ability to cover a TE.

by pksiv on Dec 21, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree the INT was huge...

but had we not gave them the ball on the 4th and 1, and they not scored (which they may not have been able to given having to move the whole field), the INT would not have been so big. To me its a toss up.
The game plan was fine, and I had no problem abandoning the run to some extent when we got down. The one thing that I am concerned about is why the run was struggling in the first place. I have no way to re-watch the game, and do not know if the TV coverage would help me at all anyway. I am reading that the o-line did not do their job. I agree it looked like the Indy line was getting pretty good penetration throughout the game, so I can buy that. My question is how did this all of a sudden happen? Our O-line had been run blocking very well it seemed the last 5 or 6 games, and now not at all? That seems pretty hard to believe, and if it was stunts that Indy was doing, those are usually fairly easy to correct for with pictures on the side lines. All that being said, I still wonder to what extent the MJD knee was a factor. I just never looked like he had the burst he had the last few weeks. And I wonder which knee it was, because he looked stronger going to the right side than the left side. That would make me think that it was his left knee that was hurt, since I believe the outside leg gives more mower. I Hope he heals up this week, but am concerned because it took the bye week to get him right earlier in the week.

by GAJAGFAN on Dec 21, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

includeing that 4-1....you can pretty much count that as a

“TO” so in reality, we had 3, deffinatly cant win with that math against a team as pass happy as the colts are.

WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
--George Patton--

by JaxBlaster on Dec 21, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

just liket his game for us....

how huge our 2 turn overs were, pretty much took points off the board for us as well. Win the turn over battle and 85% of the time you win the game.

WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
--George Patton--

by JaxBlaster on Dec 21, 2010 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

The Colt turnovers were both inside the 10. The Jaguars were both far outside “gimmie” points range. You can’t really say they took points off the board.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 21, 2010 11:14 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I see your point....

but the way the offense was humming, the INT I think took at least three off the board.

by GAJAGFAN on Dec 21, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

should i say, potentially took points away?....

i guess that flows better…

WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
--George Patton--

by JaxBlaster on Dec 21, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Not scoring a TD

When we had 1st and goal at the one in the first quarter didn’t help much either. Can’t kick field goals against the Colts. Go Raiders!!

by DuvalCJ on Dec 21, 2010 9:36 AM EST reply actions  

you are right sir....

and we were saying that all week, key to winning is TD not FG!!!

WE ARE JAGUARS.......FEAR OUR ROAR!!!!!!

The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
--George Patton--

by JaxBlaster on Dec 21, 2010 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Very true

And even without mistakes the players still played crummy. I think it says a lot about how good this team can be to still be in the game late with everyone performing like they did.

by jstnblke41 on Dec 21, 2010 1:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

its true..

we made so many dumb mistakes, and yet still found ourselves down by only 3 to INDY LOL..they are NOT that good..and we are not that bad at all..we are actually a playoff team in my eyes, i think besides the pats in the afc, we could stand a chance against all the other afc contenders ravens/steelers/jets/chiefs/chargers(our loss to them earlier we werent nearly as developed as now)

by FgallosJAGS on Dec 21, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Look at the bright side

Our 3 and out number is still stellar, but when you look at the number of times we’ve gone for it on 4th down, you have to wonder how many of those “go for its” occurred on the initial set of downs.

Anyway, at what point do we close the book on this game and move on to the next 2? We can dissect til the cows come home, it is not going to change the result. Got out relatively injury free. Cannot say the same for the Colts.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 21, 2010 11:06 AM EST reply actions  

You gotta score with the colts

to beat them. When you turn the ball over, it takes away from your ability to score with them. 18 makes it all work that way and I just don’t see us winning the division as long as he’s up there. He requires that your offense works to perfection and when it doesn’t, he’s just gonna outscore you.

Coach Crennel, if all of your Coors Lights can talk what happens when you open your fridge? There's generally "Hoopla" involved.

by Jagtastic on Dec 21, 2010 12:23 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Cat Country:: Jacksonville Jaguars news, commentary, speculation and fun, all from a fan's perspective

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

015_small
My issue with college football
Small
Blaine Gabbert Video Sampler Platter
Small
Interested in joining an all-time NFL mock draft?
Hurricane1_small
2012 Game-by-Game Predictions
Kiwi-new2_small
Mullayo's May 53 man roster
Chester_cheeto_small
The New QB Dilemna
Small
SeminoleKid's 53 man roster
427156_10100101523662812_25113406_40383667_409228455_n_small
Mojo not expected at OTA's
Small
Gabbert's '11 Season not as bad as we thought...
Screen_shot_2012-05-14_at_4
Bold City Brigade Members Event

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

77312417837578290_small River City Rage

180103_10150110239888826_529758825_6295646_8155374_n_small Adam Stites

Image_small Alfie Crow

Editor-in-Chief

Img_6121_small silencecs

Contributor

404931_2894108066464_1073166201_32535141_1775032715_n_small CaliforniaJag

32213_924639348222_5111476_51082025_729592_n_small T.Holmes

Twitter_pic_small Shane Clemons

Small Michael Appelbaum

P9260123_small Jagfan89

Cole_small theeCodyTaylor