Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

Aaron Kampman, can he produce?


Aaron Kampman has been an amazing DE, and may still be an amazing DE.  But no one knows until training camp.  He has supposedly been signed for a 4-year 26 mil 11 mil guranteed contract, is it worth it?  I think so, he sounds like he can produce, in his latest conference, he sounded confident.  I think he will supply the needs to put the Jags pass rush over the top.  Even if he can't produce for our team, maybe he can influence our players like Torry Holt did last year, but then a4-year contract would be too long.  I think it was a good sign, what do you think?

Comment 50 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm sure quite a few people are with the Gene Smith conference call

Either way, if Gene thinks he is worth the cash, I’ll accept it for right now. Other than Brian Russell, he’s done a good job with free agents.

by Jonathan Loesche on Mar 9, 2010 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

He has 26 million reasons why he needs to produce

If he can’t, he’s gone. Weaver won’t pay him that much to “mentor” other players. Thats what Del Rio is for.

by JagsAlex87 on Mar 9, 2010 7:16 PM EST reply actions  

i know he wont mentor for 4 years, but he can mentor this year, and maybe next year, hes not expected to fully produce this year because an ACL injury take 1 full year to heal normally, Kampman thinks he’ll be rdy by training camp, so we’ll have to see

by rhettchrystal on Mar 9, 2010 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Like you said, we’ll have to see. Maybe he can help Harvey a little. But him and Groves have been in the league for 2 years now, so it’s not like they’re rookies. They have experience, now they just need to keep working and start producing.

by JagsAlex87 on Mar 9, 2010 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

but him being a key player to the jags and a good player means o-line would concentrate more on him and others can sneak in and sack the qb

by rhettchrystal on Mar 9, 2010 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

But to do that

they need to start winning the individual battles, and that’s something that didn’t happen last year

by JagsAlex87 on Mar 9, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Worth remembering

… that after his 1st season, Kampman’s sack totals were LESS than those of Harvey right now, and pretty close to those of Groves. Harvey/Groves may not be rookies, but most DEs only start to blossom in their 3rd year. It’s a tough position to learn. In Kampmans’s FIFTH season, he broke into double figures for the 1st time.

                             1st Year Sacks 2nd Year Sacks 3rd Year Sacks
       
Kampman 0.5 2 4.5
Groves 2.5 0 ??
Harvey 3.5 2 ??

by KeithG on Mar 10, 2010 1:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

my VERY carefully laid out table did not translate in the posting process

by KeithG on Mar 10, 2010 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Heh. Here:

Sacks by year
Kampman; 1st: 0.5, 2nd: 2, 3rd: 4.5
Groves: 1st: 2.5, 2nd: 0, 3rd: N/A
Harvey: 1st: 3.5, 2nd: 2, 3rd: N/A

And very good points. A lot of fans are frustrated because they (Harvey and Groves) we expensive picks and were expected to produce quickly. Kampman was a 4th round pick, so most gave him leeway. I agree that we should wait and see what we get from Harvey and Groves this year.

by alwaysforgiven821 on Mar 10, 2010 2:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Was Kampman even a starter?

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Mar 10, 2010 7:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Kampman's first few seasons

Season 1: 6 starts, 0.5 sacks
Season 2: 10 starts, 2.0 sacks
Season 3: 16 starts, 4.5 sacks
Season 4: 16 starts, 6.5 sacks
Season 5: 16 starts, 15.5 sacks

Progression, and time to learn the position.

Interestingly, after 2 seasons Groves has matched Kampman’s sack total, but with only 7 starts (as opposed to 16).

by KeithG on Mar 10, 2010 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

season 6 i think he had 12 sacks too

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Kampman did not start until the 2005 season, in which he had double digit numbers

He wasn’t that good before that. I recall being upset we re-signed him that year, but kind of ate my words on that one.

I understand why many of you have concerns because he’s coming off an ACL. One thing that seperates Kampman from many other DE’s though, is that Kampman does not rely on speed, agility, and athleticism to get to the QB. He relies very little on his legs. Kampman excells at bull rushing and technique. I may be biased, but in his prime, Kampman was the best bullrushing DE I’ve seen in a very long time. Not the best all around DE, but best bull rusher.

Very Strong Upper body + Excellent technique = Less of a factor the ACL brings him down.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Mar 10, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Really?

Then the official stats on NFL.com are incorrect. They have him as starting 16 games from his 3rd season onwards. 2005 was season 5.

by KeithG on Mar 10, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

2005 was season 3 he was a rookie in 2002 this will be his 8th year

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Come on everybody! Hop on the Aaron Kampman bandwaggon. Woohooo!!!!!! LOL!

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Mar 10, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Weoooooow

Someone should put the bandwagon in their sig’ and garner some support

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Mar 10, 2010 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

True

Sorry, was confusing myself with “1st season started” and “1st season with double digit numbers”. They are not the same.

by KeithG on Mar 11, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I think he can produce if healthy

but with most of his youth behind him and playing a division where it’s harder to get to the QB, I don’t think his numbers will be like those in GB. He doesn’t get to play the Lions twice a year, which is good for nearly 3 sacks a year for him. He usually gets his sacks in bunches; and, usually he gets them against mediocre teams at best.
That being said, you gotta be good against teams you’re supposed to beat too. And AK is a professional that will be a steady force on the field once he gets over his injury.
Still, I’m surprised that he starting walking without a limp 7 days after having his knee surgery. That’s impressive.

by Ewdtrey on Mar 9, 2010 7:38 PM EST reply actions  

Totally not true man. This is Aaron Kampman, not Jared Allen.

Against the Lions, yes….AK is due 2 or 3 sacks. Otherwise, he consistently gets to the QB. Another thing is, you can’t factor in pressure situations to sacks. Even if AK isn’t sacking the QB, he’s in the QB’s face.

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Mar 10, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Well the bench mark

for DE’s is sacks. We already have a few players that put pressure on the QB. We need finishers, and it just so happens that AK gets most of his against mediocre OL’s. Trust me I’d like to crown him as the next LT, but I know I would just be fooling myself. Will he help get to Manning a bit more? Yes, I think he will, but I don’t think he will get the sack numbers he has in the past. He’ll be praised if he gets one sack against Peyton after both games.

by Ewdtrey on Mar 10, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Never said he was the next LT. That’s a long shot. Are you saying he’s not an upgrade over what you have now?

"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Mar 10, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

damn…and were not playing them this year.

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Kampman might not be healthy by then

If they want film on him, put in some old Packers film. I’d much rather play them a little later on when he’s 100%.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Mar 9, 2010 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

It's Peyton

Of course he’s gonna find film of Kampman.

by JagsAlex87 on Mar 9, 2010 11:52 PM EST up reply actions  

It's his OL

job to find AK’s tape and etc

by Ewdtrey on Mar 10, 2010 4:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

But who on the Colts watches more film than Roger Ebert?

by JagsAlex87 on Mar 10, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

if you think about it...

Reggie Nelson hasn’t been doing good, but thats because of no pass rush, these receivers keeep going deep on him every play, and he can’t help it. With a pass rush , the receivers won’t have the time to always jumpon Nelson. Therefore Nelson can get better because of a strong pash rush, cuz he’s constantly giving up points.

Ex: The colts. I iknow its hard to sack Peyton, but atleast rush him. Reggie Wayne goesdeep, Reggie Wayne bites on a quick fake, Reggie Wayne is wide open in the endzone. With a strong pass rush, they wont have Wayne going deep as often, because we will be Peyton, therefore they have to rely on short and quick slant routes, and were good at taking those away.

by rhettchrystal on Mar 9, 2010 8:23 PM EST reply actions  

Nelson is doing good because

he has his head to far up in blankety blank not because of the lack of pressure.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Mar 9, 2010 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

isn't*

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Mar 9, 2010 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

partially, but how come we havnt got rid of him? JDRmight think the same as i do..

by rhettchrystal on Mar 9, 2010 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Two reasons

1. Athletic potential
2. 1st round investment

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Mar 9, 2010 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

This

Also, keep in mind that every player on the defense suffers from a lack of a good pass rush. For some reason, though, Nelson looked the worst. I love Reggie, and will support him every moment he plays. But he just needs to get smart.

by alwaysforgiven821 on Mar 9, 2010 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

#2

Is somewhat moot becase I don’t think Gene Smith would be afraid to cut one of Shack’s picks.

by Ewdtrey on Mar 9, 2010 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

And atm, the lack of a better alternative

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Mar 10, 2010 7:04 AM EST up reply actions  

reggie nelson* bites on a quick fake

by rhettchrystal on Mar 9, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

now we will have more even talent on the d-line because henderson has great talent. knighton is showing us some good stuff, and hes pretty good. no DEs until Kampman and hes good, harvey and groves wont be double teamed as much.

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 9:11 AM EST reply actions  

this year we might come back as a dominant defense in the league(or next year) We need a beter FS, 1 DE, and maybe an OLB

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 9:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Unlikely

but if the offense continues to progress, we may not be so bad.

by Ewdtrey on Mar 10, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

ATTTENTION!!!!!!!!!

I have good news.

Totally not true man. This is Aaron Kampman, not Jared Allen. Against the Lions, yes….AK is due 2 or 3 sacks. Otherwise, he consistently gets to the QB. Another thing is, you can’t factor in pressure situations to sacks. Even if AK isn’t sacking the QB, he’s in the QB’s face.

“No player is greater than a team.”
-Vince Lombardi

by Jabooty on Mar 10, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

WE ARE FACING THE BROWNS, SKINS, BILLS, RAIDERS, AND CHEIFS!!!!!!!!!! 2-3 × 5=10-15 sacks thanks Jabooty

AK is getting atleast 10 sacks woooo

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 7:33 PM EST reply actions  

not the lions but they are just as bad

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

his things starts out a negative message and endspossitive?

by rhettchrystal on Mar 10, 2010 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

If he's playing

RE he’s unlikely to get any sacks against the Browns.(Unless Seneca Wallace decides to run around like crazy)
The Skins may have a new LT, as well as the Bills. And the Chiefs really improved at LT with Albert playing much better down the stretch last season. Shoot, even the Raiders could have a new LT. Though I imagine whoever they pick will probably be schooled by AK.

by Ewdtrey on Mar 10, 2010 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Kill-joy

:]

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Mar 10, 2010 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Cat Country:: Jacksonville Jaguars news, commentary, speculation and fun, all from a fan's perspective

Manager

77312417837578290_small River City Rage

180103_10150110239888826_529758825_6295646_8155374_n_small Adam Stites

Screen_shot_2011-10-06_at_11 Alfie Crow

Editor-in-Chief

Img_6121_small silencecs

Contributor

316188_10100604014127692_5111476_59179124_1366496501_n_small T.Holmes

Shane_clemons_small Shane Clemons

Small Michael Appelbaum

P9260123_small Jagfan89

Tvh5hc55tg_154738946_small arawls

Cole_small theeCodyTaylor