The Jacksonville Jaguars Should Draft Jimmy Clausen in 2010
If the opportunity presents itself on April 22nd, the Jacksonville Jaguars should run to the podium with Jimmy Clausen's name on their card. While at the moment it seems rather unlikely that Clausen will fall all the way to pick number 10, this draft is very similar to last season when quarterback Mark Sanchez nearly fell into the Jaguars lap.
As we all know, the Jacksonville Jaguars have done everything short of absolutely nothing to address the quarterback position since they drafted Byron Leftwich in the first roundof the 2003 draft. Since 2003 the Jaguars have drafted exactly 0 quarterbacks in any round and are currently the longest tenured team to do so. Even teams like the Colts and the Patriots who have two of the best quarterbacks in the NFL have drafted quarterbacks, as early as the 3rd round (Kevin O'Connell, Patriots, 2008). While the Jaguars have not been in position often to address the position in the first round of the draft, they have been in position in later rounds to so and have ignored the position.
While it's unlikely the Jaguars would have found a franchise quarterback in the latter rounds, it does need to be mentioned that the position has been ignored for far too long. Regardless of how you feel about David Garrard, it's pretty obvious the Jaguars need to start planning for the future. Personally, I feel the Jaguars erred big time in 2007 when Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn fell into their lap, twice, and the Jaguars decided to pass on him. Now let me be clear, I didn't like Brady Quinn then and I still don't like him now, but it still needs to be mentioned that in the midst of a quarterback controversy the Jaguars had a potential franchise quarterback fall in their lap and ignored it.
Would things be different today had they drafted Brady Quinn?
Doubtful, but you get the point.
There is an outside shot that Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen could slip to pick number 10 later this month, and I feel it would be a mistake for the Jaguars to let a quarterback get past them again. It looked like last year Mark Sanchez would fall to the Jaguars, but the New York Jets leap frogged them and got their quarterback of the future. The Jaguars courted Sanchez much like they're doing Jimmy Clausennow. Many will argue the Jaguars are doing it to draw interest for another team to trade up, but I contend that their interest is genuine andreal. There is word around the building that the front office is not pleased with current quarterback David Garrard, nor should they be. Not to mention the slew of back handed compliments that have been let loose by General Manager Gene Smith, head coach Jack Del Rio, and even owner Wayne Weaver has made some comments about Garrard's preparation.
Many will argue taking a quarterback in the Top 10 will put too much of a financial burden on the Jaguars, given that David Garrard is due roughly $8 million in salary in 2010, but let's be real here. If Jimmy Clausen is drafted 10th overall by the Jaguars, it's highly unlikely David Garrard remains on the roster. That is, unless Garrard agrees to take a massive paycut. Some will say it will be in the Jaguars best interest to keep Garrard on the roster even-so, so that Clausen has a veteran to sit behind and learn from however, how good of a role model can David Garrard be?
I don't want this to sound like a bashfest of David Garrard, but let's be honest. Do you want your rookie quarterback learning how to prepare from a quarterback who was publicly called out by his owner as not doing enough in the offseason? Do you want your rookie quarterback back under the tutelage of a guy who admitted to the Florida Times Union he does not watch enough film and doesn't know what the defense is doing before he snaps the football?
I don't.
The Jaguars have gone long enough without addressing the quarterback position, and regardless of how you feel about the pro-potential of Jimmy Clausen; I feel it will be in the best interest of the franchise to call his name if he makes it to the 10th pick. First of all, Clausen gives you a young gun who can compete for a starting job right away. Second, it will sell tickets. Sure, Jimmy Clausen isn't the savior that Tim Tebow is touted to be, but drafting a quarterback 10th overall is going to move some tickets, regardless of who it is. Next, it gives Jack Del Rio and Gene Smith more of a sense of security. Despite how you might feel about Jack Del Rio as a coach, I personally don't mind him, drafting a quarterback in the first round extends his life as the head coach of the Jaguars. It will also finally give him a quarterback that he wanted.
I'll detail why I feel Jimmy Clausen would be a good pick in another story later this week.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We need a pass rush more than a new QB....
But I would take Clausen over Tebow. I still feel David can get it done, and with the public admittance that he needs to step up his preparation, I feel it will happen this year. Lets not forget some of his numbers from a few years back. That great effort had to come with preparation, so I think he knows how to do it. I am sticking with David, and asking for better pass rush!
When you say 'need'...
I cringe…I think Clausen is a good QB and no one really ever knows how college QB’s will do in the NFL. That being said, i think Clausen is also ahead of most other college QBs because of Charlie Weis and the system he was running. He is a heady QB with a good arm. The reason for his lack of dominance in college is directly related to the game of musical chairs between piss-poor offensive lineman. If he gets the chance to learn as opposed to being thrown into the fire, i think he could be starting in his second year. Honestly, if its BAP, who cares about anything else. A great read is the Jimmy Clausen scouting report on Walterfootball.com.
E
walterfootball doesn't know s***
frankDUBZ aka Frank Silba
"You have to stand for something, or you will fall for anything" - Me
I don't like the need comment
as well as the comment about not having drafted a QB in a long time. If you think about it, had we drafted a number of those QB’s after the 1st round, we’d still be in the same situation and with fewer draft picks along the way. You don’t draft a position because it’s been a while. You draft a position because it matches with the BAP.
love how smart the jags fans here
compared to most of the tards who Vic answers everyday…..“Should we trade up for Tebow, hell sell tickets!…etc” Its all BAP, not need
yikes
i seriously doubt that Clausen will fall to 10, but if he does, the Jags should check on trade offers. It would be a great chance to pick up some draft picks. I’d pick up a second round pick and draft a qb later.
Everyone is saying next year....Why?
We’d have to lose every game to even get in the top 5 to get either a Ponder or a Locker.
Not just those 2. There are 7-8 QBs you can make a credible arguement to be a 1st round pick.
Currently Playing: God of War III
PS3 ID: Nole1021
by Jonathan Loesche on Apr 1, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
*FIST PUMP*
frankDUBZ aka Frank Silba
"You have to stand for something, or you will fall for anything" - Me
Eh, dont like either QB much. I still say wait until next year's draft and get whichever one of the gobs of QBs the Jags feel best about.
Currently Playing: God of War III
PS3 ID: Nole1021
by Jonathan Loesche on Apr 1, 2010 10:56 AM EDT reply actions
My problem with Locker is he just another athlete playing QB in college who just also happens to have a good arm or can he be an effective QB at the next level.
Currently Playing: God of War III
PS3 ID: Nole1021
by Jonathan Loesche on Apr 1, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
He's got that Tebow-esque dynamic
But his arm is stronger and more accurate. He runs faster than Tebow and his mechanics are also NFL-ready.
Follow me on Twitter
One thing I know for sure being a Notre Dame Fan
He does not run faster than Tebow. Clausen’s not much quicker than Byron, but moves around in the pocket well enough to be effective.
by TheHammerOfSpicer on Apr 1, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
NO QB this time. Next year we can pick 1 of those veeeeeeeery good looking QBs.
Life without knowledge is death in disguise
by Zoltan from Budapest on Apr 1, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
I like Clausen
I think he is going to be a good player, but the trade down offers we would surely receive from other teams would have to be looked at first.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
Thinking the same as you... part of the dr
He could be a really good QB, but if he is still around at the 10th pick I think several teams will be interested in trading up. I also think that the best case scenario would be for Clausen and C.J. Spiller to still be around the for the 10th pick because I think teams will looking for a playmaker at that part of the draft.
please disregard......"part of the dr" from the heading
my laptop is acting screwey.
No, you should. Already plenty of idiots walking around town in them.
Currently Playing: God of War III
PS3 ID: Nole1021
by Jonathan Loesche on Apr 1, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
I saw a guy wearing one at the Texans game last year. I asked the old fart which round we should take Tebow in, and he said first, but we’d need to trade up. He said Tebow was the best player in the draft… I just went in a secluded corner and face palmed myself.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
by Bestjagfan on Apr 1, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Jokes.
Seriously, hearing what you all have to deal with in your own hometown…oy….I couldn’t imagine it.
"Lord, beer me strength."
Who Brad
Yeah, I cant imagine Tebow being drafted in the first to us. I would just have to go in a corner and facepalm myself, again…
The Jags and Texans are right there next to each other in amount of facepalms done to oneself during the season.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
Your entire premise is flawed.
I have two huge problems.
Personally, I feel the Jaguars erred big time in 2007 when Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn fell into their lap, twice, and the Jaguars decided to pass on him. Now let me be clear, I didn’t like Brady Quinn then and I still don’t like him now, but it still needs to be mentioned that in the midst of a quarterback controversy the Jaguars had a potential franchise quarterback fall in their lap and ignored it. Would things be different today had they drafted Brady Quinn?
Yes, they would be different: the Jaguars would never have gone 12-4 and nearly fought past the Patriots in 2007 with a rookie QB. And having that specific QB bust on the roster would then be the Jaguars’ problem, not the Browns (and now Broncos). The Jaguars did not err.
“regardless of how you feel about the pro-potential of Jimmy Clausen; I feel it will be in the best interest of the franchise to call his name if he makes it to the 10th pick.”
What?! The only way it is in the best interest of the franchise to use the 10th pick on Clausen is if they truly do feel he has great pro potential. If they don’t feel that, then they are not drafting BAP, they are drafting for need, they’re drafting for tickets (and if they’re going to do that, they might as well go for the ultimate ticket seller Tebow), and they’re generally putting the team back onto the path of ruin. The Jaguars have gone through enough. Gene Smith would never and will never pick Clausen at #10 because “it will sell tickets” or because “it gives Jack Del Rio and Gene Smith more of a sense of security”.
In Gene We Trust.
by MoveThoseChains on Apr 1, 2010 2:31 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
1. Drafting Quinn in 2007 wouldn’t have necessitated the release of David Garrard. It also wouldn’t have changed them going 11-5 or losing to the Patriots. Losing by 11 isn’t “nearly fighting past”, either, by the way.
Instead of them “being stuck” with Quinn, they’re stuck with Reggie Nelson and no youth at all at the QB position.
2. The premise wasn’t just to sell tickets or job security. And of course the Jaguars would have to like him. I didn’t say draft him just because. The comment you highlighted was directed at the readers, anyway.
Saying Gene Smith will never pick Clausen at to because he sells tickets is 100% true. I mentioned that and the security as a side effect.
Did you miss the “I’ll detail why Clausen would be a good pick later this week” part?
by Alfie Crow on Apr 1, 2010 3:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Guys
Clausen might be a good QB in the NFL. But i dont think we should give up on Garrard yet. No matter how you want to say it, if you draft Clausen with the 10th pick, your giving up on him. If there is a good QB prospect in the 3rd Round then we can draft one then. And why doesnt anyone want Tebow? I wouldnt mind him. He could run the WildJag. He could be used as the goal line QB to run QB sneaks. He is a star in Florida. Hes an icon. He has a great character than every winning team has. Maybe thats something we lack is great leadership and outspoken superstars. Im not saying Tebow will be good, but he wouldnt be a bad investment given the fact he is a winner a leader and a very determined player. When was that ever bad?
i wouldnt mind tebow in round 3
but def. no earlier. I think the controversy is that if we take the BAP at 10 and it happens to be a QB(Clausen/Bradford), then what does happen with Garrard? I think that Garrard should be given another chance, but how long can u keep a top ten pick on the bench?
Have you seen Garrard
on QB sneaks. He’s every bit as good as Tebow in short yardage situations. You can try to argue that Tebow is better in short yardage, but you can’t argue with perfection, which is what Garrard was in those situations when he ran the ball.
As for a WildJag player, I have no doubt that we have a number of players that could run it. Zach Miller, Gerald Alexander, or Kassim Osgood. Don’t forget that Garrard is no slouch running the ball.
Gerald Alexander
Thats interesting. Good thought. What made you think of him as a wildjag trigger man?
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
Well for one
he’s athletic and he was QB in high school. And he’s at a position we are deep(not good) at, so losing him to an injury wouldn’t be devastating.
Yeah
He’s built like a run heavy spread QB. I just really like the idea of him in a wildcat type package for some reason.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
I wouldn't bet on it,
but I personally don’t like the idea of having him on my team. I know he can probably be a good QB, but he just rubs me the wrong way like Tom Brady does.
I don't like him
But I’d like to see him at ten. 10 for 15. It’s all about the money. Watch.
Vae Victis!
Inept Drafting
Aside from their 1st year the Bags have never had a good draft.. Their braintrust has always been short both oars and drifts without direction. Apparently they know not what the QB position is. None of the ‘top 4’ Qb’s is ready to play. Draft that guy from ND if available, immediately trade down for a low 1st round (defense) and high 2nd round and take that guy from Florida. The Bags should draft that Florida QB reguardless. He will sell tickets for a year or two. If he developes into a better than average QB so much the better. The bigger problem is finding someone with the ability to recognize and draft quality blue collar players and a coach who can put it all together.
Selling Tickets
And for those who do not think selling tickets is important, without it, the Bags will be in another city soon.

by 

































