Every year we see articles written about which teams have the hardest schedules for the upcoming season.
I always thought it was a bunch of baloney malarkey hooey wrong.
Last year’s cellar-dwellers take division titles. Super Bowl runners-up don’t make the playoffs. Players retire, get traded, get injured.
To me, the whole premise seemed to be based on the false logic that “Boy, those teams were good last year, so when we play them this year, we better watch out.”
The only thing you have to watch out for is being fooled into thinking last year really matters.
I’ve listed below the rankings of what experts pretended each team’s 2009 strength of schedule would be and what it actually turned out to be. You’ll notice the experts were right three out of 32 times. They guessed right the Dolphins would have the toughest schedule, the Vikings would have the second easiest, and the Texans would be right around the middle. They missed on the 29 others, sometimes by a wide margin (the average was 9.4 places, about a third of the league).
The Ravens were predicted the have the fifth easiest schedule; they actually had the seventh most difficult. The Saints were predicted to have the eighth hardest schedule; they actually had the easiest schedule in the entire NFL.
Two points: 1) don’t rely on any strength of schedule that’s disseminated before the season begins, and 2) be careful of applying even a current-season strength of schedule. If I recall correctly, the Jags recently headed into a stretch of opponents with something like a 4-24 record, and left with four straight losses. (I’m not talking about the end of last year.)
Something else I noticed (if I’m interpreting this correctly) – there was a marked decrease in the variance of teams’ schedules. For instance, in 2008, the most difficult schedule faced 152 wins and the easiest faced 105. In 2009, the most difficult schedule faced 138 wins and the easiest faced a 107. Teams centered much more around the middle.
My argument is based only on 2008 and 2009. Maybe other seasons are different.
And if they’re predicting strength of schedule, they should predict each teams record and then use that to predict the strength of schedule, anyway.
So that’s why whenever I see an article that talks about the upcoming strength of schedule, I don’t read it. Except for this one, of course. Read this one.
I just thought I’d share my opinion and a little of the facts to support it.
p.s.- I’m pretty sure all the figures below are accurate. If a number is off, I apologize.
|
2009 PREDICTED PRETEND STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE |
2009 ACTUAL STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE |
||||||
|
Team |
Wins - losses |
Ties |
2008 win pct |
|
Team |
Wins |
Diff |
|
152-104 |
0 |
.594 |
|
Miami Dolphins |
138 |
0 |
|
|
151-104 |
1 |
.592 |
|
137 |
+8 |
||
|
New England Patriots |
151-105 |
0 |
.590 |
|
Carolina Panthers |
136 |
-1 |
|
150-105 |
1 |
.588 |
|
135 |
+16 |
||
|
148-107 |
1 |
.580 |
|
135 |
+14 |
||
|
146-110 |
0 |
.570 |
|
134 |
+8 |
||
|
145-110 |
1 |
.568 |
|
134 |
+21 |
||
|
New Orleans Saints |
142-113 |
1 |
.557 |
|
134 |
+13 |
|
|
Philadelphia Eagles |
137-119 |
0 |
.535 |
|
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
132 |
-4 |
|
New York Giants |
134-120 |
2 |
.527 |
|
132 |
+13 |
|
|
131-123 |
2 |
.516 |
|
132 |
+6 |
||
|
Jacksonville Jaguars |
132-124 |
0 |
.516 |
|
131 |
+13 |
|
|
Indianapolis Colts |
131-125 |
0 |
.512 |
|
New York Jets |
131 |
-6 |
|
Tennessee Titans |
130-126 |
0 |
.508 |
|
New England Patriots |
127 |
-11 |
|
129-126 |
1 |
.506 |
|
Houston Texans |
127 |
0 |
|
|
Washington Redskins |
125-129 |
2 |
.492 |
|
Buffalo Bills |
127 |
-10 |
|
Kansas City Chiefs |
123-131 |
2 |
.484 |
|
Atlanta Falcons |
127 |
-13 |
|
San Diego Chargers |
123-131 |
2 |
.484 |
|
127 |
+14 |
|
|
Denver Broncos |
122-132 |
2 |
.480 |
|
Washington Redskins |
126 |
-3 |
|
Oakland Raiders |
122-132 |
2 |
.480 |
|
Cincinnati Bengals |
126 |
+2 |
|
Detroit Lions |
119-136 |
1 |
.467 |
|
Dallas Cowboys |
125 |
-10 |
|
Cincinnati Bengals |
119-137 |
0 |
.465 |
|
Pittsburgh Steelers |
125 |
+7 |
|
St. Louis Rams |
119-137 |
0 |
.465 |
|
Philadelphia Eagles |
124 |
-14 |
|
117-139 |
0 |
.457 |
|
Jacksonville Jaguars |
123 |
-12 |
|
|
Cleveland Browns |
114-140 |
2 |
.449 |
|
San Francisco 49ers |
121 |
+1 |
|
San Francisco 49ers |
113-142 |
1 |
.443 |
|
Seattle Seahawks |
121 |
-2 |
|
113-143 |
0 |
.441 |
|
Indianapolis Colts |
117 |
-14 |
|
|
Baltimore Ravens |
111-143 |
2 |
.438 |
|
San Diego Chargers |
116 |
-10 |
|
Pittsburgh Steelers |
110-144 |
2 |
.434 |
|
113 |
+1 |
|
|
Green Bay Packers |
109-146 |
1 |
.428 |
|
Arizona Cardinals |
113 |
-3 |
|
107-148 |
1 |
.420 |
|
Minnesota Vikings |
113 |
0 |
|
|
Chicago Bears |
105-149 |
2 |
.414 |
|
New Orleans Saints |
107 |
-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual 2009 Results [Team, 2009 record, opponents(wins)]
AFC East W L T
New England Patriots 10 6 0 HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), BUF(6), BUF(6), MIA(7), MIA(7), NYJ(7), NYJ(7), BAL(9), DEN(8)
New York Jets 9 7 0 HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), BUF(6), BUF(6), MIA(7), MIA(7), NE(10), NE(10), CIN(10), OAK(5)
Miami Dolphins 7 9 0 HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), BUF(6), BUF(6), NE(10), NE(10), NYJ(7), NYJ(7), PIT(9), SD(13)
Buffalo Bills 6 10 0 HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), MIA(7), MIA(7), NE(10), NE(10), NYJ(7), NYJ(7), CLE(5), KC(4)
(AFC East teams played teams from AFC South, NFC South)
AFC North
Cincinnati Bengals 10 6 0 DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), BAL(9), BAL(9), CLE(5), CLE(5), PIT(9), PIT(9), NYJ(9), HOU(9)
Baltimore Ravens 9 7 0 DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), CIN(10), CIN(10), CLE(5), CLE(5), PIT(9), PIT(9), NE(10), IND(14)
Pittsburgh Steelers 9 7 0 DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), BAL(9), BAL(9), CIN(10), CIN(10), CLE(5), CLE(5), MIA(7), TEN(8)
Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), BAL(9), BAL(9), CIN(10), CIN(10), PIT(9), PIT(9), BUF(6), JAX(7)
(AFC North teams played teams from AFC West, NFC North)
AFC South
Indianapolis Colts 14 2 0 BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), HOU(8), HOU(8), JAX(7), JAX(7), TEN(8), TEN(8) , BAL(9), DEN(8)
Houston Texans 9 7 0 BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), IND(14), IND(14), JAX(7), JAX(7), TEN(8), TEN(8) CIN(10), OAK(5)
Tennessee Titans 8 8 0 BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), HOU(8), HOU(8), IND(14), IND(14), JAX(7), JAX(7), PIT(9), SD(13)
Jacksonville Jaguars 7 9 0 BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), HOU(8), HOU(8), IND(14), IND(14), TEN(8), TEN(8) , CLE(5), KC(4)
(AFC South teams played teams from AFC East, NFC West)
AFC West
San Diego Chargers 13 3 0 BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), DEN(8), DEN(8), KC(4), KC(4), OAK(5), OAK(5), MIA(7), TEN(8)
Denver Broncos 8 8 0 BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), KC(4), KC(4), OAK(5), OAK(5), SD(13), SD(13) NE(10), IND(14)
Oakland Raiders 5 11 0 BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), DEN(8), DEN(8), KC(4), KC(4), SD(13), SD(13), NYJ(9), HOU(9)
Kansas City Chiefs 4 12 0 BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), DEN(8), DEN(8), OAK(5), OAK(5), SD(13), SD(13) , BUF(6), JAX(7)
(AFC West teams played teams from AFC North, NFC East)
NFC East
Dallas Cowboys 11 5 0 ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), NYG(8), NYG(8), PHI(11), PHI(11), WAS(4), WAS(4) , SEA(5), GB(110
Philadelphia Eagles 11 5 0 ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), DAL(11), DAL(11), NYG(8), NYG(8), WAS(4), WAS(4) ,SF(8), CHI(7)
New York Giants 8 8 0 ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), DAL(11), DAL(11), PHI(11), PHI(11), WAS(4), WAS(4) , ARI(10), MIN(12)
Washington Redskins 4 12 0 ATL(9), CAR(8), NO(13), TB(3), DEN(8), KC(4), OAK(5), SD(13), DAL(11), DAL(11), NYG(8), NYG(8), PHI(11), PHI(11) , STL(1), DET(2)
(NFC East teams played teams from NFC South, AFC West)
NFC North
Minnesota Vikings 12 4 0 ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), CHI(7), CHI(7), DET(2), DET(2), GB(11), GB(11) , NYG(8), CAR(8)
Green Bay Packers 11 5 0 ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), CHI(7), CHI(7), DET(2), DET(2), MIN(12), MIN(12) , DAL(11), TB(3)
Chicago Bears 7 9 0 ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), DET(2), DET(2), GB(11), GB(11), MIN(12), MIN(12) PHI(11), ATL(9)
Detroit Lions 2 12 0 ARI(10), SF(8), SEA(5), STL(1), BAL(9), CIN(10), CLE(5), PIT(9), CHI(7), CHI(7), GB(11), GB(11), MIN(12), MIN(12) , WAS(4), NO(13)
(NFC North teams played teams from NFC West, AFC North)
NFC South
New Orleans Saints 13 3 0 DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ATL(9), ATL(9), CAR(8), CAR(8), TB(3), TB(3), STL(1), DET(2)
Atlanta Falcons 9 7 0 DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), CAR(8), CAR(8), NO(13), NO(13), TB(3), TB(3), SF(8), CHI(7)
Carolina Panthers 8 8 0 DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ATL(9), ATL(9), NO(13), NO(13), TB(3), TB(3), ARI(10), MIN(12)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 3 13 0 DAL(11), PHI(11), NYG(8), WAS(4), BUF(6), MIA(7), NE(10), NYJ(7), ATL(9), ATL(9), CAR(8), CAR(8), NO(13), NO(13), SEA(5), TB(3)
(NFC South teams played teams from NFC East, AFC East)
NFC West
Arizona Cardinals 10 6 0 CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), SF(8), SF(8), SEA(5), SEA(5), STL(1), STL(1), CAR(8), NYG(8)
San Francisco 49ers 8 8 0 CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ARI(10), ARI(10), SEA(5), SEA(5), STL(1), STL(1), ATL(9), PHI(11)
Seattle Seahawks 5 11 0 CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ARI(10), ARI(10), SF(8), SF(8), STL(1), STL(1), TB(3), DAL(11)
St. Louis Rams 1 15 0 CHI(7), DET(2), GB(11), MIN(12), HOU(8), IND(14), JAX(7), TEN(8), ARI(10), ARI(10), SF(8), SF(8), SEA(5), SEA(5), NO(13), WAS(4)
(NFC West teams played teams from NFC North, AFC South)
<!--EndFragment-->


There are 9 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.