Much Ado About Rookie Contracts
The Jacksonville Jaguars currently have five of their six draft picks under contract. All that is left is the 10th overall selection, defensive tackle Tyson Alualu. The hand-wringing and panicking is going to begin as we approach closer and closer to training camp to get him in camp on time.
It is very interesting the dynamic between the public/fan opinion during this time of the year.
Generally the player is villainized during the contract negotiation process by the fans of the team he is negotiating with. Some fans will go with battle cries of "GREEDY!' and others will contend that if the player really cared about football or the team, he'd just tell his agent to sign the contract already so he can get in on time.It's not even close to that simple.
The most interesting part to me however, is how the player always winds up as the bad guy. What some don't seem to understand, or better yet want to understand, is that teams are just as guilty as what some fans accuse the player of.
Why is it just the player who's being the greedy one?
Isn't the team being stingy by not offering a player a market contract?
Often you'll hear fans chastise the player for holding out for that "extra million" and try to make it seem like the player is being greedy. On the other hand, isn't the organization being just as greedy for holding out for that million dollars less? Why do they seemingly get a pass?
The teams get a pass because we're fans of teams, not players. We relate to the team. We feel as if we are part of the team and the team is part of us. Some take offense to a player putting out the notion that what we're offering isn't good enough. We also have to remember that to fans, football is a game. It's entertainment and it's fun. To the players and teams however, it's a business. It's a business like no other and is so out of the realm of the norm in the general business sense that most people will never fully understand it.
Say what you will about the market and how ridiculous it's gotten that each season a rookie becomes the highest paid player at their respective position, but that's the game right now. Until that changes, getting upset about it and complaining what market value really is, is much ado about nothing. It's not all necessarily the agent's faults, either. They're doing a job as well. You have to remember, if these agents don't get a player as much as they can, it hurts their business the following years attempting to get more clients. Taking a little less here and there to get a player into camp can be a good thing at times, but no one wants to be "that guy" who has the stigma for consistently taking under market value, because simply who wants to sign with an agent who makes you less money?
Think of it this way:
Say the agent is a person holding a garage sale. Say the player, Tyson Alualu, is a really nice chair. The team is a frequent garage sale goer, and is good at wheeling and dealing. The team really wants this chair, but is only going to pay a certain price for it. The agent knows this chair is valuable and has a price in his head of what he wants and what is acceptable to take. The issue is finding that happy medium between what the team is willing to pay for that nice chair and what the agent is willing to take for it.
Stupid analogy I know, but it's exceedingly difficult to try to break these things down into simple business terms, because it's a complicated business. It's a type business that the vast majority of people never see in their lifetime. I tweeted a bit this morning questioning why it was always the player seen as the bad guy, and I of course got the standard "maybe teachers should start holding out" responses. As I said, it's a complicated business and it doesn't relate to the real world as we all know. I think it's safe to say everyone thinks teachers, etc. should all be better compensated and all of that, but what does bringing that up accomplish in this regard? Nothing, it's just a way for some fans to rationalize their anger and upset state.
I feel like I'm rambling here, but this is the point: Don't get mad at Tyson Alualu if he misses some days of camp. In the grand scheme of things it's not important. He's trying to get the most he can while the team is trying to get him as cheap as they can. Tyson I'm sure wants to be in camp on time, but he can't just take less to do so. It's bad business. In a game like the NFL where the average life span is less than the required time to qualify for a pension, players need to get as much as they can. Not to mention with potential labor unrest on the horizon.
It's all business. It's nothing to get upset about.
At the end of the day, Tyson should get around $18-$20 million guaranteed no matter if he signs early or late. It all just depends how business goes.
It's a big game. As Omar Little said, "I got the shotgun. You got the briefcase. It's all in the game though, right?"
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good perspective
You can’t really fault the player for trying to get what he is worth, its no different then any of us wanting to earn what we deserve at our own jobs.
It is tough though when you have a small market team that has to shell out 20 million dollars for a signing bonus to a player who hasn’t proven anything. I do sympathize with the teams in that regard. I mostly blame the agents for the hike in prices and the need to set records every year although economically we might not necessarily be as stable as we were 5 years ago. Glad the new CBA is coming up for this reason only, it would have taken a team refusing to sign their first rounder to make any changes as it currently stands methinks.
No top 10 rookie is WORTH what they will get this year
It hasn’t been about worth for many years. It’s about what they can get. It only takes one top 10 team to overpay for a rookie to screw up the entire pay structure.
While I understand players trying to get whatever they can, it has not correlation to what they’re WORTH.
by pksiv on Jul 25, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree
But the precedent has been set by GM’s giving into agents demands. Teams don’t HAVE to give players all this money, but because it has been done in the past. No one is settling for less then they can get, regardless of if they are actually worth it.
Pay the man!
The Jaguars are trying to save the franchise by preventing blackouts this year. A bad start to the season can be the final straw, that ends football in Jacksonville. If there was ever a time to play the player it is now. It does not look like we will sell enought tickets to stop blackouts by the start of the season, so winning is the only way to stop blackouts.
There is to much at stake to let a million or two to cause a long hold out that may be a death nell to Jaguar football in Jacksonville. I know he is only one player but there is no room for error in saving the Jacksonville Jaguars.
The problem is
that the team is being held hostage. They got 1 first round pick in the draft. It is no longer a free market when the draft is involved. The team either gets a ‘possible’ good talent or gets nothing. The team can’t go back and pick someone else. They have no choice other than to sign the guy. That is why the salaries are so high. And another thing. We are talking about negotiating with a guy who has not even taken one NFL snap. If you are going to have a draft, which I do agree with, you have to also recognize that you have already violated free market principles at that point. So, couple the draft with a short-term, fixed, slotted, pay scale and include a matching disability policy. Let the players prove themselves for one or two seasons, and then let the negotiations begin.
I don't see that
There is no loyalty in football. Ask Byron Leftwich.
The Jaguars always could have passed on their pick. First of all, let’s get off this myth that the Jaguars don’t come off the wallet. The way I see it, they are now making more fiscally sane decisions.
The teams have a rough idea of what they will pay based on last year’s 10th pick AND based on picks 7-14 this year. Many people said when the Jags won the coin flip it was a $3 million loss due to the “top 10” psychological factor. The thing I believe that is holding up the draft picks signing is the fact that Bradford has not signed yet.
On a side note for all of the Tebow fans, you think the potential Alualu holdout is going to be bad, it’s nothing compared to the dollars the Jags would have to throw a top 10 quarterback and of course the negotiations playing out in the media (no hometown discount) etc.
You talk violation of free market principles and I can go along with that. However, you’re talking a VERY short shelf life. 10 years is a long career, not the 35 plus year career you and I may have as well as quality of life. Don’t hate the player hate the game. He’s got maybe 2-3 renegotiations tops. The nature of the last CBA says they can ask for the world, it’s the owner’s prerogative to pay it. If the owners and players can redo the CBA, you may get your wish. But, don’t know if you watch other sports but the way I see it, the unintended consequence of your proposal is a Miami Heat like situation where several players align and take less to join forces. I mean, let’s say Alualu, Suh, and Pierre Paul all decide they want to take their talents to the Big D.
I dont blame Alualu
However, if he doesnt get in fairly quickly it may be difficult to catch up on what D’Anthony has learned and earned (assuming he does well which I expect).
Fair points
I suspect a lot of fans look at it in the context of their own personal finances. Lets face it: Alualu is going to get more guaranteed money than most of us will make in the next 30 years put together. It’s perfectly understandable (though still wrong) for us average joes to get incensed about rookie salaries and holdouts.
Poor Analogy
You are making this a lot harder than what is really is. There already is a scale for each player at each slot where he was selected in the draft. You take last years contract for say the ten spot in the draft, and apply a 6% increase ( I believe is the standard percent increase) over the guaranteed money. Very simple!
What makes educated fans frustrated is when players such as Derek Harvey hold out, and hurt the team and themselves.
The jags offered Harvey a very fair contract with the standard pay increase over the previous years player selected in the same spot. He held out for x amount of days, and than finally signed a contract that the jags had been offering all along.
Who won, nobody The fans were upset, the player was way behind in learning and development, and the team was hurt by having a player play poorly.
Should the team cave and give a player whatever outrageous amount he wants, NO WAY? Nor should a player accept a contract that isn’t fair. Their are already guide lines for how each player is supposed to be paid.
I
slotting?
A question. Is the slotting the same regardless of position? Point is, I think a 10th player who is a quarterback would garner more money than say a offensive guard.
Personally I think the NFL ought to go with a “high 3” for top 20 picks and “high 5” for 21 through end of 2nd round. For those players taken top 20, you take the top 3 salaries of the draft picks at that position in the previous year, unless there’s an anomaly where you have 1 offensive guard taken in the first 3 rounds; and players 21-2nd round average of the top 5 salaries. Of course this year’s qb’s would make out while next year’s qbs would take it in the shorts, but hey, that’s the way it goes.
If it were that simple, there would never be a hold out.
by Alfie Crow on Jul 24, 2010 12:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It is that simple. The problem is certain agents play hard ball, and use tactics like holding out to get as much money as they can. Like everything there are good agents as well as bad.
On the other side of the coin there are certain teams that are cheap like the Bengals. There are also teams like the Redskins who pay ridiculous amounts of money and throw everything off.
Like I said, if it were that simple as slotting and set increases in pay, there would never be a hold out.
by Alfie Crow on Jul 24, 2010 1:36 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Why not like the franchise tag?
Use a system that awards its rookie salaries the same way it does a franchise tag, which I think is average of top five at that position.
Granted, it has a few specifics to work out, but it would put rookie salaries more in line with the players who’ve proven themselves.
On the other hand, I don’t recall many veterans complaining about rookie salaries. They also benefit from the increased contracts.
Both parties involved are equally guilty...
In my eyes the only true solution would be a rookie cap.
Maybe rookie contracts should be predetermined before hand so they can get all first rounders in camp on time. It’s ridiculous for someone who never played a snap of NFL ball to get millions in guaranteed money… it’s even more ridiculous that every year the player gets more money, just b/c he was drafted one year later.
I think if they fix rookie salaries a lot of other things would fall into place (CBA).
the only thing that irks me is when a player says “I plan on being in camp on time.”… in that case, i fully believe that it’s the agent being a “YES” man and telling the player whatever he wants to hear… making the player seem more naive than he probably really is… yeah yeah, i know it’s a business and blah blah blah… let’s get a rookie cap!!
Sean
Pax Armis Acquiritur
I cant fault anyone for trying to get more money but the owners should have more control over the situation and not be put in such a position where they might fear losing someone. The players union and the agents have held this league hostage and its time that owners take back control for the fans sake.
by Catfanatic1979v1 on Jul 24, 2010 6:11 PM EDT reply actions
Are you ready for no football?
The day the owners try and put their foot down is the day they start a lockout.
You can't reason with unreasonable people.
Who says thats what there worth?
I call B.S
The reason the management of the organization “get a pass” is because the team salary is capped, so most of the time they are working with a budget not skimping just to but a extra million in the owners bank account…, the management and other players are at the stadium working on being a team and said holdout is not, besides the teams typically get shitted on because a lot of players ruin the whole philosophy of a contract by simply holding out for money when they want more even when in the middle of a current contract. Players also relax when they get big dollars and simply dont play nearly as hard.
I cant blame the players 100% because this is the standard. MORE MONEY EVER YEAR FOR DRAFT PICKS, AND HOLD OUTS WHENEVER YOUR UNHAPPY WITH YOUR MONEY. These things are ridiculous but they are the standard, so most players have why not me to attitude, and at the rate things are going its just going to get worse.
This all why im impressed when players do the right thing and the organaztion does the right thing like with the MJD situation…
And yes im fully aware of management and organizational downfalls also…..
Basically everybody in the NFL needs to check with me first before making decisions on how to proceed….but my services wont be cheap and i require a 100 year contract.
I can.
I understand the whole slotting system, but....
for a guy that thought he was a late 1st holds out for an extra million, makes no sense to me. Even if he accepted a 17 million signing bonus, that’s five million more than Dez Bryant’s whole contract (11.8 million).
The whole problem with this system is greed!!!!
There is greed on both sides of the table. Players salaries have gotten out of control, and the owners are not much better. The problem is that it is we fans that will foot the bill with ticket prices that are steep. I know that we are blessed here in J’vill with some of the lowest prices in the NFL, but it is still a hurdle that some fans that would like to come to the games may not be able to overcome.
Football is a dangerous sport, and a career can come to an end in one play. It is also very hard work and far more time consuming than many of us think. Plus, if you are good enough to make it to that level, you have a God given talent that most do not, and it makes you very valuable. All these things demand a large paycheck, but not the ones as large these guys get.
There is no way for us average guys to understand what it would mean for someone to had us $10 million or more for a signing bonus. My wife and I will never make $10 million combined (unless something drastically changes!), and yet I feel we lead a very comfortable life. I am not saying that an NFL player should not make a superior salary, they have worked hard and earned it. I am not saying that an owner should not also have a large paycheck, after all, they are the owner of a successful business. I am only saying that a little bit of reality could bring all the numbers down, and then I doubt that any teams would have as many attendance issues as they do.

by 


















