Will the Jacksonville Jaguars see a return on their defensive line investment?
Throwing money at problems usually never works out in the end. In the realm of the NFL, high profile free agents and draft picks makes for good fodder during March and April. Rarely does it translate to positive headlines during October and November. This spring, the Jaguars opened up the check book like few other times in team history in order to rectify the problem at the defensive line. After spending all of January saying that the team had no intentions to make a "big splash" in free agency, the Jaguars went out and grabbed Aaron Kampman to the tune of $11 million in guaranteed money. Then spending all of March saying they were going to trade down, they stayed at #10 and make a selection that was greeted with "Tyson AWhowho?!"
Although Tyson Alualu's deal hasn't been finalized, it will be worth around $18 million in guaranteed money. That's not even including other bonuses or game salary. Factoring in the remaining guaranteed money owed to DE Derrick Harvey, and it's quite apparent the Jaguars have a large chunk of their payroll in their starting defensive line.
When the Jaguars have spent money like drunken sailors before, it has usually resulted with egg all over their faces. In the late 90's, the Jaguars went out and mortgaged their future to get to the Super Bowl. Instead, high profile signings like Bryce Paup and Hardy Nickerson failed to do much of anything. Then in 2008, the front office once again drank the Kool-Aid and threw out more monopoly money to the likes of Jerry Porter and Cleo Lemon. Not to mention mortgaging their 2008 draft for Derrick Harvey.
Just two years later the Jaguars are on the verge of doing it yet again. Once Tyson Alualu signs on the dotted line, the Jaguars will have spent almost $30 million in guaranteed money this off season on two players who haven't done anything in a Jaguars uniform. Worse yet, one is coming off ACL surgery and the other has never played a down in the NFL before.
As far as getting an answer to the titular question, we won't be able to give any real answer until several months from now. I fully expect the first few weeks of the regular season to have its fair share of disappointing moments. The hype that is surrounding the two is tremendous and will only magnify any mistakes that are made. When Halloween rolls around, we'll know where those two stand. By then, we'll know how well Kampman's knee is holding up and how well Alualu will have adjusted to the pro game.
As far as Alualu goes, I do believe he'll be great in the teal and black. He's clearly a talented player who has a drive to get better, and you can't ask for more from a Top Ten pick. However, the Kampman signing does have me on edge. I just keep thinking of when the Jaguars signed Bryce Paup. The similarities are scary and certainly a cause for concern. Both were 30 year old sack artists who began to experience a decline in production. However, the general consensus was they had enough left in the tank to make it a worthwhile signing. Paup had 8 sacks in two years and still ranks as the Jaguars biggest misstep in free agency.
Simply put, the Jaguars are going all in that the unit will not only become respectable, but a strength of the team as a whole. Heading into the 2009 off season, the Jaguars wide receivers were arguably the worst unit in the NFL and by the end of 2009, was a strength of the team. However, that group's road to redemption was much different.
That unit's rebuilding was done on the cheap, both via free agency (Torry Holt) and in the draft (no one was higher than a 4th round pick.) Mike Sims-Walker was a 3rd round pick who showed a lot of potential before inevitably getting hurt.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Paup and Kampman similarities
They’re both white guys who played defense on NFL teams in the north and got/getting paid by the Jags… and that’s about it really. Bryce Paup was solely a 3-4 pass rushing OLB specialist. Kampman is a 4-3 pass rushing DE. Kampman is far more comfortable and fits way better in this defensive scheme than Paup did. The reward potential is far greater with Kampman and relies solely on the knee. If the knee is good, Kampman is great. Like 10 sacks a year great. I voted 5-8 on the poll because I think he’ll be around 7-10 this year if the knee responds well enough early in the season. His technique and motor are proven commodities, it’s a matter of time with him.
It takes a mixture of free agency and the draft to truly build a top notch team across the board. You can’t be afraid to spend money when you have to, as long as you don’t kill yourself against the cap to do it. It’s not like AK got Peppers money, and he’s far more consistent as a player.
WTF IS THE INTERNET?!?
The big thing with Paup was he was a 3-4 OLB forced to play 4-3 OLB.
by Alfie Crow on Jul 26, 2010 8:10 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I hope he does good
I would almost be fine if he gets more attention then Harvey sneaks in and grabs a sack. The opposing team makes adjustments for Harvey and Kampman gets in and gets one. Which then will open up Potroast and Alualu. Win win win scenario. If that happens, I just used up all of my luck and will not win powerball.
Spending Works
I look forward to Gene Smith or Vic uttering the line “we
inherited this mess of a d line. By spending 30 million we have created or saved over 30 sacks this year”.
by Slawsc on Jul 26, 2010 10:41 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Great points Jon
I hope this time Gene and the Jags have luck with the gamble on Alualu and Kampman. Because now the stakes are not about winning the division; or go to the Super Bowl, but to stay in Jacksonville….
Life without knowledge is death in disguise
Follow me on twitter @iktriad
by Zoltan from Budapest on Jul 26, 2010 10:58 AM EDT reply actions
Paup wasn't the Jags biggest misstep in free agency...
Gotta give that illustrious award to Mr. Hugh Douglas
i think you have to give Douglas the nod there because he was a DROY
frankDUBZ aka Frank Silba
"I'm smacking you with the truth......" - Me
I with ya on this one!
Hugh does radio here in Philly, and was joking on the afternoon show with Howard Eskin on 610 WIP, that when he signed with the Jags, he knew he was done. He bragged about the fact that it was nothing but a money grab. He was laughing and bragging, and it was one of those rare times that I wished I could have reached through the radio and pimp slapped him!
I'll be your dog, just don't treat me like one....
How to avoid spending a lot of money:
Don’t draft in the top ten for three consecutive years. Spending $11M on a player every few years isn’t that big of a deal. However, if you’re negotiating a $15M+ guaranteed contract every year, you’ll be spending too much too often.
Get in the pick 20 range, and everything will be a little more comfortable.
Hopefully this won't be an issue
after the new CBA is signed. Even if there isn’t an overall salary cap in the new CBA, I find it hard to believe there won’t be some kind of rookie cap installed.
Hopefully this won't be an issue
because we’ll be picking in the 20 + range after a series of playoff berths
by JohnnyBiceps on Jul 26, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed.
But even there it would be nice if those salaries are more reasonable. A rookie should have to prove himself. I wouldn’t even mind if the rookie cap had built-in escalator clauses based on # of starts etc…
Just so that if you don’t do anything for your first 2 years, which most draft picks other than RB don’t, than you don’t make $2-15M/year for those years. Sure, if you’re #1 and you perform like Matt Ryan, I have no trouble with the last 3 years of a 5 year deal escalating to the $5-7M range. But the first 2 years should be reasonable no matter where you’re picked in the first round.
what?
what is this guy talking about? “throwing money at the defensive line”? gene only brought in ONE free agent to the D-line and GOT RID OF henderson, groves and hayward. The author suggests: “Just two years later the Jaguars are on the verge of doing it yet again.” what?! doing what again? All they did was sign kampmen, risky move? maybe, but to write “this spring, the Jaguars opened up the check book like few other times in team history” and to try and compare to other times went the jags went free agent crazy is ludacris. Derek Harvey is shack’s pick and gene smith was drafting BAP. you totally made a story out of nothing. yes we all want to know if the D-line will produce, so why cant you just ask that? Additionally just because previously the jaguars made some bad (terrible) free agent pickups doesnt mean the notion of picking up free agents is terrible. Its been proven to work. You especially cant compare when the man in charge currently wasnt in charge when those decisions were made. cant wait for the training camp to start so we can begin discussing FOOTBALL!!
Don't forget about Alualu
which is gonna cost the Jags a lot of money
You can't reason with unreasonable people.
Your right but…they had the 10’th pick and if it wasn’t alualu it would have been someone else who would have got the same amount of money. They did try to trade down but failed. The reason why they picked him is because they had him ranked as their BAP. I don’t usually criticize an article however as I was reading this I was thinking “what is this guy talking about”?! Yes the jaguars have done a lot to revamp their D-line. But for the most part have made sound moves. If there are any questionable moves here its whether or not they made the right decision in getting rid of a bunch of guys not about who they brought in. There are so many story lines this off season, no need to desperately create new ones.
by leon k on Jul 26, 2010 11:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Derrick Havery might be Shack's pick but he will still cost money this year
The point that was being made was there will be more than $30 million in guaranteed money on the D-line this year. Name other teams that say the same. That is what was meant by “opened up the check book”.
Right
but it’s not correct to classify that as the jags “throwing money at the defensive line”. That money was written into his contract years ago.
Top 10 picks cost money. The pick was on the DL but the money was being thrown regardless of the position that was selected.

by 




















