Jacksonville Jaguars: Garrard Silences Some Wolves
Heading into the second pre-season game of the season on Saturday, Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback David Garrard knew the wolves were after him. "I think it was probably a little overanalyzed last week. We went into a game in Philly with not one but two tackles (out) and there was probably a little bit of a guarded approached to how we began the game in Philly. And I think we were a little more willing to do some things tonight that gave David a chance," head coach Jack Del Rio said after the game.
Garrard didn't slam the door shut for the wolves nipping at his heels, but he did push the door to only a crack. Garrard came out for his first drive and hit a 7-yard pass to wide receiver Mike Sims-Walker, followed by a run by Maurice Jones-Drew for a loss of 6-yards and then Garrard missed Maurice Jones-Drew over the middle of the field for what would have been a first down.
Blood was surely in the air now for the wolves, after another David Garrard three-and-out.
Luckily for David Garrard, the Jacksonville Jaguars much maligned defense came out with purpose on the first drive after punter Adam Podlesh dropped a punt right on the Dolphins 5-yard line out of bounds, pinning the Miami Dolphins deep in their own territory. On the first offensive play for the Dolphins, Chad Henne was sacked by two new additions to the Jaguars pass rush, defensive end Aaron Kampman and defensive tackle Tyson Alualu. Kampman forced Chad Henne up and moved him out of the pocket while Alualu cleaned up the play, almost registering a safety. That safety would come a few plays later after back up running back Rashad Jennings sliced through the blocking to block the punt.On Garrard's next drive however, he showed some of the ability we all know he has. On the first play of the second drive, Garrard hit Mike Sims-Walker for a 35-yard gain down the middle of the field. If I really wanted to nit-pick, I could complain that if the ball was leading Sims-Walker instead of forcing him to leap for the ball, it would have been a 78-yard touchdown toss. None the less, it was a good throw and catch for a chunk of yardage. Two plays later on third down, Garrard hit Sims-Walker again on a route over the middle for a long catch and run for 22 yards. After failing to punch the ball in the endzone on three running plays, Garrard hit second year receiver Mike Thomas on quick short pass in the endzone for an easy touchdown.
Good drive for Garrard. The wolves will be quiet, for now.
On David Garrard's third drive it was a big cluster word-I-will-not-type.
A 47-yard kick return by rookie Deji Karim was called back for an illegal wedge, starting the drive on the 7-yard line instead of at mid-field. A short pass to fullback Greg Jones was called back for holding by right tackle Jordan Black, and the very next play a 6-yard run by Rashad Jennings was called back by an illegal procedure call again on Jordan Black. Finally on the third first down play Garrard hit Troy Williamson for a short pass, which was nearly called back for another illegal procedure penalty on Jordan Black, but after a conference the penalty was called off and the play stood. The very next play, David Garrard just barely overthrew a pass that was bobbled off the outstretched fingertips of Troy Williamson as he tried to haul in the catch. Garrard was planted to the ground and slow to get up after the throw. Veteran defensive end Charlies Grant beat guard Uche Nwaneri with a spin move to the inside and had a free shot on the quarterback, sending David Garrard out with a minor rib-injury.
Backup quarterback Luke McCown came in in relief, and faired just fine with the first team offense to close out the half. McCown had two nice long passes before the half and continued to play well to finish out the football game. Later in the game McCown sailed some throws and was behind on some throws, one of which was intercepted missing wide receiver Jarrett Dillard over the middle of the field. McCown didn't put on the aerial display he did against the Philadelphia Eagles, but he was good enough to still be applying pressure to the starting quarterback David Garrard.
"There were a lot of positive things to happen tonight but you tend to think on two or three plays that were there for us to make and we didn’t make them," said McCown following the game.
The clamoring for Luke McCown to get time with the first team should die down a bit, but Garrard was still inconsistent at times despite playing well. In order to completely shut the wolves out, Garrard needs to carry the momentum into this upcoming Saturday against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. At the same time, Luke McCown will hopefully continue to put pressure on David Garrard, as he seems to be responding to the challenge.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
maybe I heard number wrong from ref, but I thought
Those back to back penalties on the third drive were on Paul McQuistan
the ref said it was on 79 but he was not in the game
by kungfuman104 on Aug 22, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Okay! Thanks for clarification..
I didn’t even look, just heard 79 and started fuming about back to back penalties. LOL…Now I feel bad for screaming “cut McQuistan RIGHT NOW” 10 times…
McCown
also threw a perfect ball to Clarence Denmark late in the 4th…which Denmark flat out dropped.
I am not a fan of local boy Denmark. Doesn’t seem to have NFL skills.
He definitely dropped the second one
But the first was more of the defender making a play on the ball. It was dropping into his bread basket and he hit it out. Denmark should have gone up for it and turned his body, but possession isn’t the name of his game. More often than not thats a completion.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
oooh, I dont know.
I DVRd the game and I thought at the game it was a good defensive play, but upon further review the defender never touches the ball. I put that on CD. Plus, hes a longshot and needs to make those plays and “get them on film”
" If I really wanted to nit-pick... "
by finishing this sentence, you are nit-picking.
Especially when one of those long passes from McCown was a complete Duck that Mike Thomas bailed him out by coming back for and catching yet no mention of how bad the throw actually was.
Maybe I could mention the pass Lewis bailed Garrard out on?
It was a joke. Calm down.
by Alfie Crow on Aug 22, 2010 8:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I'm perfectly calm
but you spend so much time trying to prove your not against Garrard but then throw those little jabs in every article you write, even the ones that you try and make seem positive.
It was a joke, and you fell for it.
Seems like unless I say he’s perfect, you take issue.
by Alfie Crow on Aug 22, 2010 9:11 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
An if you think I’m against any player, you need to recheck your priorities and look in the mirror. You claim I hope he fails, yet you seemingly get so upset at an obvious quip.
Again, pot meet kettle on this “agenda” garbage.
by Alfie Crow on Aug 22, 2010 9:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
still not sure
why you think I’m upset. Nothing that’s written on this site upsets me. Just pointing out your agenda. Besides, the play of the defense is a far greater concern than the QB.
by pksiv on Aug 22, 2010 9:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
i agree
its overanalyzed
we all know that Garrard is above average when he has protection. he doesnt have protection.
And all those who look down on me I'm tearing down your balcony
btw, alfie
im not knocking any analysis. im just saying everything football gets overanalyzed. its what we fans do.
I enjoy your articles and i’ve read your stuff for roughly 2 maybe 3 years. i don’t remember for sure. I always thought that had something against Garrard, but if you’re trying to be objective, I completely respect that. And thanks for writing articles so often. It gives me something to feed the crave.
In other news, I want Ponder as well.
And all those who look down on me I'm tearing down your balcony
tonight
I just watched the game tonight. Few quick thoughts:
Garrard looks fast. Very fast. I think somehow Dirk should get him to revert back to more of his old form by running a little more and not so much of a pocket passer 100 percent of the time. Play to his strengths.
Jarrett Dillard looked good.
That ball to Troy Williamson that he dropped wasn’t really catchable imo.
The return game is looking great.
Don Carey loves to have his hands on wide receivers. It’s a potential problem. I think he may get cut. Idk. Tell me if you think I’m wrong.
I think we need to run more two TE sets with Marcedes and Miller. I think Marcedes could be phenomenal. Give him the chance Jack.
What happened to Greg Jones? He’s huge, but he forgot how to run the ball. Run blocking for MJD is going well atm.
I’d keep MSW, Thomas, Williamson, Dillard, and Underwood. Find a spot for Osgood where you’re not taking up a WR spot or keep six. So in effect, keep em all.
Cox is getting his head spun constantly. I hope he doesn’t turn into a Reggie Nelson-type. It’s been on my mind lately.
Two more points: One, I’d love to have Rex Ryan as our head coach. Say what you will, but he knows how to bargain for great players. His players respect him, and he’s done an insanely great job.
Also, I wish we would have swallowed our pride a little and made a play for an Anquan Boldin/Santonio Holmes type. They were both cheap. I’m not sure Mike Thomas is going to be another Steve Smith. I think he’s a glorified slot receiver.
I’m pretty conservative on our dealings and support Gene, but my last two crazy thoughts would help us win. That’s really all I want in the end.
We would probably see more
2 TE sets with Miller and Lewis, but Miller is hurt right now.
Troy Williamson is my man, and I think he’s shown much better hands than he’s been given credit for, but that ball was totally catch-able. He didn’t turn his hands the correct way. If I were to give him an excuse, it would be that his view of the ball may have been blocked by the LB(?) in coverage.
I thought Dillard looked really good. He’s gonna be a life saver when teams decide to blitz us.
I think our WR group is plenty good. We don’t need Holmes or Boldin.
Yeah, I just saying I want to see more of that. For whatever reason, i have some sort of unjustifiable loyalty to Williamson. For whatever reason i want him to do well. Maybe it’s because I think he could live up to the hype that originally surrounded him. Idk.
That ball was not catchable imo. Seriously. Dillard looked great though for sure.
Well, you certainly seem like you’re upset at the slightest criticism of Garrard.
Then again, its everyone elses fault.
aha… the last little “Alfie” second line snippet… always a pleasure to read his highness’ uppity comments.
Sean
Pax Armis Acquiritur
Glad you enjoy it, pot.
Or excuse me, I guess I should respond with “meh”, right?
by Alfie Crow on Aug 24, 2010 9:34 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Just watched the replay last night
and while sure, Marcedes made a great catch, Garrard threw the ball to the only place it could be caught. Even the Dolphins announcers – Bob Greise included, were talking about what a great throw it was – albeit a risky one.
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's and LB's ability to cover a TE.
anything to make sure someone besides Garrard is at faulr rite?
jesus dude he’s not perfect. stop getting worked up over stupid crap. you comment everytime to excuse garrard from something even if it’s not really a big deal
the nit pick thing was obviously a play on people thinking he has an agenda against garrard
this is all old news
this is vintage DG. He can be awesome at times. Consistency is his nemisis.
by OGN on Aug 22, 2010 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
but
that is not good enuff! we dont have to suffer thru another up and down Garrard season do weeeeee?
Raisingbran.com
Regular Guys with Regular Opinions Trying To Keep You Regular
in a word- yes
The ONLY element of the team I can see so far as a bailout for Garrard is our special teams. I don’t see the combined running back game breakers that we had in 2007. We’ve actually got the 2 areas (punting and return games) that turn the field. Karim is something else, reminds me of this old CFLer Gizmo Williams.
If we can get our average starting spot to be at least the 35 to 40 yard line, that will do wonders. Also, if the coverage team can keep the opponents to at most the 20, that will bode very well for us. Of course this will likely equal 250 yard halves like we’ve seen in the preseason thus far, but as long as we limit teams to field goals…
Its either up and down with Garrard (at times)
or up and down with McCown (more of the time). Take a pick.
yeah - I think we do
DG is the best qb on the roster at present. The only way I foresee any change is if:
a) DG gets hurt AND
b) we get McGowen play and not McCown play out of backup – consistenly.
Give DG his props where it’s deserved – he is tougher than Ajax and with this line – he needs to be.
In all honesty, I do not see a QB chnage until next year at the earliest and probably not until 2012 (assumng that there will be football in 2011).
i vote him as tough as anybody
everything was well worded as usual OGN. and this mcgowen thing is going to be jekyl/hyde
And all those who look down on me I'm tearing down your balcony
QB? reallY
Talk all you want about QB this and that, but until you see improvement in the OL, where the QB doesn’t get planted and there are some holes for the RB to run through you are merely whistling in the wind! Not to mention how porous our defense is…If we want a winning team in Jacksonville those are the dominant issues…all else is stricly a sideshow!
there is no denying
that this team still has huge weaknesses. Oline is definately one, D line is still one and so is our secondary. However, these weaknesses have all to often been used as excuses to deflect weakness at the qb position. Not recognizing that DG has faults – his own faults – is simply not pragmatice nor realistic. This topic was primarily about DG.
I do agree that Oline and D rank higher in priority. But we must not lose sight of the need to upgrade the QB posotion as well. I’m on board with going after one of the top prospects in next years draft class.
i dont think anything about this game can be said without mentioning how bad the offensive line performed.
yeah, the pass protection was slightly better than last year. But Detroit was slighlty better than last year in their winning two games.
And all those who look down on me I'm tearing down your balcony
i agree dg performance was misleading. kinda like normal. gets a good drive every now and then but i thought are o line was alright against the pass rush horrible run blocking. and these are just my opinions im not a coach or claim to be so no name calling or dumb shit just cause you dont agree. go jags
He won’t play differently than he ever does. David is a good quarterback and he will give you these kind of games, and he will also give you really bad ones…inconsistency is the problem and there’s no sign this will change. He’s got good and improved weapons, also an improved OL…i think we might have a better year offensively. But again, this won’t matter without a pass rush, we are just not getting there yet, hope this is just pre season form.
"Do I need to be liked? Absolutely not! I like to be liked, I enjoy being liked, I have to be liked. But it's not like this compulsive need to be liked...like my need to be praised." Michael Scott
The funny thing about all this inconsistency talk
is not even Peyton Manning or Drew Brees drive for a score on every possession. Sometimes even the best in the game go 3 and out. The defense is getting paid too.
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the our O-Line, DB's and LB's ability to cover a TE.
You do realize there is a Defense
playing against the Jaguars offense and trying to force the 3 and out right ?
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's and LB's ability to cover a TE.

by 




















