Conflicting Reports: Jacksonville Jaguars Maurice Jones-Drew has Surgery
According to Aaron Wilson of the National Football Post reports that Jacksonville Jaguars running back Maurice Jones-Drew had arthroscopic clean-up surgery on his knee due to lingering meniscus issues.
Jones-Drew was already expected to miss Saturday's game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, but now he's going to be out the remainder of the pre-season.
"It's like Allen Iverson said, it's practice," Jones-Drew said Thursday. "There's no worries."
At this point, there's no cause for concern as far as his availability for the regular season.
Of course, the injury might give fantasy football owners some pause when it comes to selecting Jones-Drew in their respective drafts.
Jones-Drew wasn't likely to play in the final pre-season game anyway, so there is no real cause for concern.
If there was a regular season game tomorrow, Jones-Drew would play.
UPDATED 5:46 PM - Conflicting Report Emerges
According to Tania Ganguli of the Florida Times-Union via Twitter:
Maurice Jones-Drew did not make the trip to Tampa, but he did not have athroscopic knee surgery as has been reported, according to his agent Adisa Bakari and an independent source.
"Absolutely false," Bakari said. "Maurice did not have surgery."
"What arthroscopic surgery is there that a player can return in one week?" Bakari said. "There isn't one."
So, who do you believe? I honestly don't know. Aaron Wilson has good sources with the Jacksonville Jaguars, but an agent is right to the source so-to-speak. Agents however are not always going to give the truth publicly, as sometimes it helps the player to fib a bit. I'm not calling Bakari a liar in the least, just pointing that out when trying to find information. This is why multiple sources are generally preferred.
I'm going to let this one play out while I make some calls.
UPDATED 7:03 PM - Story Changes to "Rumored"
It's come to my attention that National Football Post has seemingly changed their story from "I learned he had surgery..." to "It's been rumored..."
I'm going to say this is busted. He had no surgery.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's one tough...
SOB. I’m not worried at all. Until it is confirmed that it is a serious injury, MJD deserves the benefit of the doubt. It’s been quite a few times that he’s taken a shot, left the game, only to return later as if it never happened. If only all of the Jags players were as tough.
via twitter
taniaganguli – "maurice jones-drew did not make the trip to Tampa, but his agent said the report he had surgery was “absolutely false.” #jaguars"
He said, She said, They said, We said
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp10/news/story?id=5504869
Sean
Pax Armis Acquiritur
once again
the dangers of the internet and the “right now” news show up. There’s no accountability in journalism anymore.
I mean if this was regular season, seeing as how the NFL is pretty much gambling driven, could you imagine the action on a Jags game with news like this?
There is accountability still
It comes from traffic and reputation. If you’re constantly crying wolf for the sake of hits, it’ll come to bite you in the ass sooner or later.
Big Cat Country, The #1 Jaguars blog on the net
by Jonathan Loesche on Aug 28, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
perhaps
I was a little harsh. There is SOME accountability, but in the ESPN era of sports news, there is seldom a retraction.
Maybe people like me have gotten a bit put off by the Florios of the world.
No, you’re right. A lot of guys try to scoop now. There’s been a lot of things I’ve sat on because I can’t verify.
Stinks.
by Alfie Crow on Aug 28, 2010 11:28 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Alfie,
You’ve, at the very least, kept your integrity because of it.
I mean everyone wants to be the first, but there’s something to be said for keeping your not necessarily totally reliable sources in your pocket until there is a 100% confirmation.

by 

















