2010 NFL Cuts: Should the Jaguars pursue Patrick Crayton?
Given the up and down nature and general disappointment that's been Troy Williamson and Tiquan Underwood, should the Jacksonville Jaguars pursue a player like Dallas Cowboy's receiver Patrick Crayton?
I've asked Dave Halprin of BloggingTheBoys.comto give us a rundown of Patrick Crayton and how likely it is he's outright released:
Patrick Crayton is a very reliable receiver. He's mainly played the 3rd receiver role for the Cowboys but has been pressed into starting duty on occasion when injuries strike. His best work has come when he's played in the slot, he has good hands so he rarely drops a ball and he knows how to run proper routes. He's a guy you can trust. He's not a speedster so he's not really a deep-threat type receiver. We've also used him as a punt returner and much like his play at receiver, he's trustworthy; he'll make correct decisions about when to return it, when to fair catch it and when to let it go. He's had some returns for TDs, but mainly he's just dependable to catch it and get a few yards on the return.
Personally, I would be shocked if the Cowboys cut him. He's a guy you can depend on and this league, injuries happen, so we would probably use him at some point during the year. Now, I do believe the Cowboys are actively seeking a trade for him so I think that's a real possibility. But cutting him and getting nothing in return would be a very stupid move by the Cowboys organization.
Generally, I agree with Dave. I don't see Crayton being outright released, but I don't think he'd cost too much in a trade.
Crayton's been productive with the Cowboys as the number three, netting 500+ receiving yards the last four seasons. He is 31 years old, so he'd be a short term solution, but it's clear the Jaguars want another guy at the position. It's also possible that Jarett Dillard may be ready to step in and take that third receiver position, as he's had a very productive pre-season coming off his broken foot.
Jack Del Rio said at his press conference last night that they are evaluating other teams rosters like they're evaluating his own, which to me sounds like there could be a trade on the horizon, coupled with personnel man Terry McDonough hinting at it on Monday night on the radio. Be it for a wide receiver, safety, or something else.. but a trade could be on the horizon.
Just some food for thought.
38 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If/When he’s released, I dont see why we wouldn’t.
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 9:58 AM EDT reply actions
Yes we should...
….and I’m glad this came up because my entire ride to school this morning I heard on the radio that either Patrick Crayton or Sam Hurd may get cut. But then, there’s the possibility of the Cowboys keeping both, so it really wouldn’t matter.
He have to be cut
a trade would likely mean he would keep his salary, which is a bit expensive for a 4th receiver that wont contribute on OUR special teams.
IF he is released
I would be okay with bringing him in if the Cowboys released him. But I honestly don’t see him being released and I don’t see the Jaguars giving up picks for a 31 year old career backup receiver.
If by chance he is released, I think there would probably be a team desperate at WR that would overpay him. Washington comes to mind.
He is due to make $2 mil this season, and $2.5 next year. In my opinion, that’s not enough $ to influence the cowboys to release him. (IMO)
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 10:09 AM EDT reply actions
I think they should just admit their big mistake and cut Roy Williams.
by Fivus Viener on Sep 3, 2010 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree
Since I’m not expecting a Super Bowl victory this year anyway, I’d just assume we let our young guys get as much playing time as possible.
I really think we’re going to be surprised at the production when MSW, M80 and Marcedes are all on the field every down.
DG is the best we have and help is not on the way. I realize he's not perfect, but I feel a lot better about him at QB than I do the O-Line, DB's and LB's ability to cover a TE.
Imagine Zach M on there too… NASTY!
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
I worry about his ability to stay out of the trainer's room
What’s the saying “It’s tough to make the club when you’re always in the tub?”
Man I hope he stays healthy, otherwise he’s the offensive version of Marty Cordova.
You mean “Jorge Cordova?” (Football Terms)
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
lol
Just making sure, because Marty Cordova was a baseball player. lol
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Correct.
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Jorge Cordova
Completely different story. Miller has had a few minor injuries. Cordova had a major knee injury in TC as a rookie and never recovered.
by Fivus Viener on Sep 3, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Maybe so but that doesn’t compare to Cordova’s blown out knee.
by Fivus Viener on Sep 3, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
No Super Bowl?
Just having fun! I do not see a need for Crayton on this years team. I think it would be another Tory Holt experiment, and that may have been just what the Dr. ordered last year with young receivers, but that’s not what we need now. We certainly don’t need another guy that can return kicks and punts. I think we are sitting pretty good there! If a great (or even good) safety does not become available, I would stick with what we have and go!
No Super Bowl?
Just having fun! I do not see a need for Crayton on this years team. I think it would be another Tory Holt experiment, and that may have been just what the Dr. ordered last year with young receivers, but that’s not what we need now. We certainly don’t need another guy that can return kicks and punts. I think we are sitting pretty good there! If a great (or even good) safety does not become available, I would stick with what we have and go!
Ehhh.
I don’t think it would be prudent. When we talk about the disappointment of Underwood and Williamson, we’re talking the 4th and 5th wideouts in the WR derby. Seeing as how we want balls going to the TEs and backs, you’re talking the 7th and 8th option out there. As I see it, I see MSW, Thomas, Dillard, Underwood/Williamson, Mathews, Denmak, and other guy. If Thomas and Dillard were not progressing as they should or if MSW gets injured, it might be nice to have a proven vet in our back pocket.
In a nutshell, I don’t see wideout as an area of glaring weakness at this moment. I’m concerned about the depth, but who are we kidding, we don’t have Dan Fouts behind center. It is what it is. I anticipate that the tight ends will have more production on average than our 3rd wideout unless Dillard proves to be that Anthony Gonzalez type player.
I think the bigger question will be what linebackers, secondary players, and perhaps d linemen become available. Gotta say if a Chris Horton gets cut, Gene needs to fly his ass in that minute.
I guess I just listed every damn position on defense didn't I?
oh and maybe a backup qb if a good one is left out there.
Afalava is available from the Bears, per Mike C Wright.
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Forget Crayton.
Dillard in the slot, keep Underwood for the deep threat despite his performance last night. Osgood #5 receiver. Matthews on PS. And go get a safety!
TRADED
So much for that idea. Crayton traded to SD.
Follow me on Twitter!
(MikeH_63)
by floridafalcons#63 on Sep 3, 2010 3:56 PM EDT reply actions
Fine with me.
If we’re going to be bleeding valuable ammunition for this upcoming draft, it better be for a safety and a safety only.
In Gene We Trust.
by MoveThoseChains on Sep 3, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
Chances are, we’re only giving up players in trades. I doubt we’ll give away any picks.
Another player that we could trade for however is Matt Willis with the Broncos. He’s got Williamson and Underwood speed, size, and upside but he’s showing more current promise with better hands after being a track star in college.
And he’s only their 6th receiver, so he might come cheap. Maybe Bolen(seeing how LenDale tore his achilles) or a player like Kynan could be enough to seal the deal.
Crayton HAS been traded to Chargers
http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=5528702
Bap. End of discussion.
Sean
Pax Armis Acquiritur

by 





















