Jaguars need to win or lose on the back of Maurice Jones-Drew
After an inexplicable decision to not call timeout with well over 30 seconds left on the clock, the Jaguars took far too long to run a play on first down from the two yard line and when they finally did, running back Maurice Jones-Drew got one yard. The Jaguars then elected to use their final timeout, with just eight seconds on the clock.
Dirk Koetter made the decision to pass on second down to preserve the opportunity to run two plays if necessary and following a drop by Jason Hill, it was. With three seconds left on the clock, the Jaguars have to run the ball with their MVP and ace, Jones-Drew, but instead decided to pass with their rookie quarterback from one yard away.
It didn't work. There's no guarantee that Jones-Drew could've plowed ahead for the one yard necessary to score, but I surely would've been more comfortable with the loss had the Jaguars decided to give him the chance. Many Jaguars players agree:Via Tania Ganguli, wide receiver Mike Thomas said after the game about Jones-Drew not getting the ball on the final play, "Ideally that’s the guy, in short yardage situations, that’s the guy you probably want the ball in his hands"
Guard Uche Nwaneri responded to fan comments on Facebook with, "You want the ball in your ace's hands, but hell whoever gets their number called, you gotta make the play."
The decision to go away from Jones-Drew was one that Jack Del Rio said was Koetter's decision, although he said he didn't disagree with the decision. Regardless of who made the decision, it was the incorrect one. Jones-Drew is far and away the best player on the Jaguars offense and has to be the one they rely on in key situations.
Beyond the final play of the game, I have not had many qualms with Koetter's play calling or Del Rio's coaching. Koetter has had the challenge of calling plays for a team that struggles to execute in every aspect offensively. In the last two week's we have witnessed more plays that have been within the comfort zone of Blaine Gabbert and the Jaguars have been much more successful moving the ball down the field.
However, comfortable or not, the Jaguars absolutely cannot take the ball out of the hands of their best player in crucial moments.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We don't need to let him doing anything but take 20 or less carries and call it a day.
Season is over, we are out of contention, shut it down for MJD.
by Slvrgun on Nov 21, 2011 8:12 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Win
Gabbert should have ran the ball in at the end and it’s a W
he would have walked into the end zone.
one thing david did well was the QB draw. have we even attempted one this year?
No
b/c we actually care about this QB
Can't stand the truth?
by Aristotle45 on Nov 21, 2011 10:25 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions 1 recs
Totally agree with this post Adam. This is exactly how I was feeling right after the last play.
It’s inconceivable how DK did not get MJD the ball there SMDH.
Yeah Right...
If MJD would have gotten stuffed on the final play of the game, all the articles written today would be questioning, "Why did we draft a QB in the top 10, if we don’t put the game in his hands..???
Win or lose…questions gonna be asked regardless but atleast put the ball in your franchise RB hands on the 1 or 2 yd line. Rookie QB & no respectable receiver outside of M. Lewis…
by orecic76 on Nov 21, 2011 9:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he's a rookie qb with a highly suspect receiving corps
MoJo is one of the best backs in the league and the heart of this team’s identity. you win or lose on his back, not Gabbert’s.
Section 442, RIP
"You think you know, but you don't know."
This was like Michael Jordan not taking the final shot with 3 seconds left.
Phil Jackson wouldn’t have done it and our dipshit coaches shouldn’t have done it to MJD. It’s painful watching them coach these games at times.
MJD
Yes it sucks ball crap loosing a game that was ours …….the clock management was turd crap ….. With those extra seconds back on the clock ……… MJD would have plowed it in with power and gave us a “W” for sure man !!! Loosing to the Browns tastes like RATT PISS guys !!!
L F J
POUND THE ROCK
That’s what we are …………That’s what we do ………….. MJD is our Bread winner and shud have the rock when it matters most ………Bottom line son !!!
L F J
Which one is it?
Let Blaine take over or give it to MJD? I feel like I’m losing my mind over here, if we lose but Gabbert didn’t throw it 30 times then we should just air it out. On the other hand, we lose but MJD didn’t get involved in the big plays then its why aren’t we using him more?
The only thing that seems true to me is that neither option has helped us too much in the win department.
Like I said in the article
I think Koetter has done a good job with play calling and did a good job on Sunday against the Browns. With the exception of the last play. Best player on the team has to get the ball.
Follow me on Twitter
There’s a time to throw, and a time to run. Kotter does not make the best choices, IMO. They’ve been needing to step up the passing game (and not just air it out down the field), but this was one time when MJD needed take it.
Throw the ball, score points.
MJD should touch it every time if your thinking like that
You can’t think of the game purely as a chess match, if you want us to go to our best players then we should avoid throwing it period. You can’t have it both ways.
You can't have it both ways? Chess match?
That makes sense. Just because people are thinking that MJD should’ve gotten the ball on one play means you avoid working on a passing attack. Okay, whatever you say.
Throw the ball, score points.
That's an absurd statement
I assume that’s hyperbole, because the can’t carry 65 times a game.
I’m sure there will be times where putting the load on Gabbert’s shoulders will be appropriate.
In this case, however, you have the ball on the 1 yard for the game-deciding last play of the game. You have to use your horse.
Strangely enough, the Browns said they were expecting pass. Wonder how that would have turned out.
Section 442, RIP
"You think you know, but you don't know."
by unhipcat on Nov 22, 2011 4:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Counterpoint:
MJD has been pretty unsuccessful in short yardage this year.
I like to watch.
by MoveThoseChains on Nov 22, 2011 4:12 PM EST reply actions
Counter-counter point
The passing game hasn’t exactly been a well oiled machine in the red zone either. Coin flip if you ask me. I have no issue with play calling and wouldn’t have had an issue if we ran MJD
by JohnnyBiceps on Nov 22, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Fact.
Adam put it best:
Koetter has had the challenge of calling plays for a team that struggles to execute in every aspect offensively
I like to watch.
by MoveThoseChains on Nov 22, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
True that
Though personally I don’t buy into the players not plays dogma, Koetter hasn’t exactly had the tools for success this season
by JohnnyBiceps on Nov 22, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions

by 





























