Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Rapid Reaction: Jags Fall to Titans

As I sit here in my hotel room in Nashville, there's only one word that comes to mind at this point: drained. This season of few highs and many lows on the field has me drained. Sorry for being gone the last few weeks-the laptop exploded after an overload of jaguars losses. At this point, there's a lot of buzz concerning the change in ownership, the hiring of a new coach in the near future, etc. I think everyone's excited for this offseason, there's no question about that. So here's my thoughts at this point on what has been a long season:

  • This defense will be good again next year-injuries decimated them but even the backups have made some plays. It seems that they give up these touchdown drives to start the game and maybe another, but overall they play pretty stout. Just remember at this point, they are without their starting: DE, OLB, 3 CBs, FS. Off the top of my head they've lost Roth, Kampman (he should be released after the season I hope), Session, Mathis, Cox, Middleton, Lowery, amongst many others that have left them signing guys like David Jones and Morgan Trent off the street.
  • Gabbert had a good game today. If you think otherwise you are mistaken. Other than a couple errant throws, overall I saw a lot of crisp passes on the money, not including the dropped passes by receivers that most often were great throws. There's no question he's progressed in some ways already from his early games and an offseason will help him a lot. On the 80 yard touchdown drive, every pass was great and that drive was one of the best of the season.
  • Maurice Jones-Drew is still a stud. This guy still racks up the yards despite everyone predicting his runs and no one fearing the Jaguars' anemic passing game. I feel so bad for a guy that carries the team on his back and works hard, probably will be the NFL's rushing leader this year, and not come close to the playoffs. That's a shame.

What I think the Jaguars need to focus on in the draft: WR (like 3 or 4), C/G/T (need some young guys to help with an aging Meester and an inept Whimper), DE (pass rusher), and a return specialist.

Obviously the receivers are just awful. They should all be cut honestly. Not one guy can catch a ball consistently, run routes well, or get separation on defenders. You can't pass the ball without receivers. Gabbert can't grow too much without receivers. End of story. All in all, I'm pretty drained from this season but my hopes are still high after seeing some positives every week. A lot will depend on Khan's philosophy and the coach he hires, but I have high hopes as this season is winding down.

Comment 107 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good write up

Does anyone know where Taylor Price was today?

by WooPig14 on Dec 24, 2011 6:09 PM EST reply actions  

I cant wait for the off season

what do you think of Justin Blackmon, Micheal Floyd, or Alshon Jeffrey in the first round and should we get a Marvin Mcnutt or Nick Toon in the second round.

by fan7 on Dec 24, 2011 6:18 PM EST reply actions  

im all for double wide recievers

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

The Problem with our Wide recievers is that they're never wide open and they have trouble receiving the ball...

by TheTealDeal on Dec 24, 2011 6:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Thats the worst thing we can do as a team

We have other important needs and spending our first two picks on WRs is a bad idea when there are some very good DEs and OL in the second round this year. If we go out and get a pass rusher and O Lineman and miss out on a WR, then I can see that happening. We need to get a WR in the first or second coupled with a big time FA. Then get a DE, CB, or OT with our other two picks in the first two days of the draft.

by Dwalk1217 on Dec 24, 2011 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I saw improvement from Dillard

He had a drop in the flats that Gabbert rocketed to him, which I think was just a mental lapse. He made some very good plays and got down field. Gabbert seems to be looking for him more often now and he is starting to make plays. He also knows how to get open, which was evident by the catch he made on the sidelines when Gabbert got out of the pocket. He doesn’t need to be returning punts, but I can see him making this team next year as our third or fourth WR, assuming we add two or three through FA and the draft. He has outplayed Thomas this year and has taken over the number 1 spot. One guy I would look at in the draft is Stephen Hill out of GT. He can make big time catches(just look at his highlight reel) and he is is a huge body that has good speed. He can have some wide open drops, but I attribute that to the fact that he only receives three or four passes a game with a terrible QB. I would assume he is coming out and he would probably be like a 4th round pick. If we go Blackmon in the 1st, he would be an excellent compliment on the outside. Just a guy for people to watch out for.

by Dwalk1217 on Dec 24, 2011 7:01 PM EST reply actions  

Dillard has been getting open all season

I’m just glad Gabbert started to finally throw to him. He really makes a QB’s job easier. Always working to the ball and getting separation. Had 2 drops, one of which I expect him to make. Not the one in the flats. The back shoulder pass he should have caught on the one got me upset. It’s a catch he can usually make in his sleep.

by Ewdtrey on Dec 25, 2011 6:59 AM EST up reply actions  

It was a different one

that was on the right side of the field. Dillard’s was on the left where he landed on the 1 yard line.

by Ewdtrey on Dec 27, 2011 4:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Green it folks'

MJD for President.

Most professional, hardest working, talented man in the entire league. Yes, I am biased :P

by jstnblke41 on Dec 24, 2011 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

100%
Jags fans are blessed with an amazing running back. Now let’s get him some wide receivers to take the load off his back. Go jags!

by Jdodd51208 on Dec 24, 2011 9:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

3 or 4 receivers?

No, if we keep Thomas, it’ll probably look a lot like this.

My Ideal Scenario:
1. Free Agent Sign
2. Justin Blackmon
3. Mike Thomas
4. Jarret Dillard
5. Cecil Shorts III
6. Taylor Price

Anyone interested in making money easy and quick on the interne, let me know through twitter or facebook(preferably facebook).
"thanks for hating"
"Give it up now before its too late!…. CJ will be shut down? Nevermind, its already too late." AZ TiTan10

Follow Me On Twitter

by rhettchrystal on Dec 24, 2011 8:11 PM EST reply actions  

I see us keeping only three of the WRs we have now

We will probably draft two WRs even if we sign a big FA. I wouldn’t be surprised if Mike Thomas isn’t here next year. I know that sounds nuts, but we have brought in a solid amount of guys this year and Thomas hasn’t looked any better than guys like West and Dillard. He isn’t playing up to his contract and unless he is playing much better during spring training, he could be moved.

by Dwalk1217 on Dec 24, 2011 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m telling all of you right now: The Jaguars fourth/fifth overall pick will not be a wide receiver.

Might as well go ahead and start thinking of something else. In all likelihood, the team will sign two starting wide receivers and draft another one in the 2nd or 3rd round.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 24, 2011 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

OT or CB

They arent signing Richardson or a QB and unless Gene goes Gene on the draft and picks someone “undervalued”, then they will probably sign an OT if Claiborne isn’t there.

by Dwalk1217 on Dec 25, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Unless it is AJ Green or Calvin Johnson, you don't draft a receiver that high

Even Julio Jones isn’t worth the 4th pick in the draft. They have to be guaranteed game changers to pick them because receivers are no where near the most valuable position on the field.

by Dwalk1217 on Dec 25, 2011 7:59 AM EST up reply actions  

But how would you know

if you have an AJ Green or Calvin Johnson? Also, how would you know if a team didn’t value Julio Jones at #4? It’s kinda up to the team isn’t it? An there’s no rule book on when you should pick what.

by moufpuncha on Dec 25, 2011 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Justin Blackmon is not an AJ Green, Calvin Johnson, or even a Julio Jones type receiver. That’s why.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 25, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

what type of receiver are they?

and what type of receiver is he?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 25, 2011 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

so really you don't have an answer

Hmm…what type of receiver are we looking for in the draft? The better type.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 12:27 AM EST up reply actions  

But just in case you do have one

What makes them so much better than him? What are your criteria? I’m just asking because I’d like to know what I should be looking at when I’m saying who I think is good and who isn’t.

Ok, here look at my thought process and see where I’m screwing up. We have Calvin Johnson, AJ Green, Julio Jones, and Justin Blackmon. Can we say that among the four receivers, there were three different offensive styles? Is that fair? CJ played at Georgia Tech in an option system, so it’s really not that fair to compare his stats straight up with the other three. AJ and Julio played in pro style offenses and Justin played in a wide open, high paced offense. Are those fair assumptions?

I’ll even give you Calvin Johnson is the “best” receiver of the bunch. So that leaves the remaining three. I’ll consider the last two years of each receiver’s career since Justin is just a sophomore.

Blackmon: 224 catches / 3118 yards / 35 td / 14.00 ypc
Green: 110 catches / 1656 yards / 15 td / 15 ypc
Jones: 121 catches / 1729 yards / 11 td / 14.2 ypc

But remember, Green and Jones played in a different style of offense than Blackmon. So, just to be fair, I’ll look at the other two two different ways. We can average them, or we can even combine them to make one super receiver named Grones.

Blackmon: 224 catches / 3118 yards / 35 td / 14.00 ypc
Green/Jones average: 115.5 catches / 1692.5 yards / 13 td / 14.6 ypc

Blackmon: 224 catches / 3118 yards / 35 td / 14.00 ypc
Grones: 231 catches / 3385 yards / 26 td / 29.2 ypc

Now, there is more than way to look at stats. You can look at them for what they are and say Blackmon slaughters both individually, and as an average, but is just edged out in a couple areas by Grones. Or, you can consider the context of each. You can consider things like the offense, or the conference they played in, or opposing defenses, or whatever.

But there’s no way you can look at the stats, then look at the way the guy plays and say he’s any worse than the other two. There’s nothing that says the other two is “simply” better than Justin Blackmon. Unless my logic is wrong. In that case help me out here.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 1:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Stats in college mean absolutely nothing and using them as a basis for comparison for these players is laughable.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

except when you wanna use stats, right?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Except I never use stats to compare players in college or how they’ll project to the NFL.

Sorry, but if you think merely looking at Blackmon’s stats vs. Julio Jones some how makes them similar or is a way to compare them, you’re in over your head. It doesn’t. It means nothing when making an evaluation for the NFL.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

sure

we’ll see next time you use stats

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

if i wouldn't have used any stats

you would have a completely different argument just for the sake of disagreeing. stats in college are useless? Stats in college put your name on somebody’s board. Stats in college determine award winners. Stats in college help fuel that speculation which results in the NFL draft.

sorry man, if he had 10 catches for 50 yards and 2 touchdowns I have a hard time believing any NFL team would look at him. Stats do mean something. To think otherwise is ridiculous.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Stats in college don’t put your name on someone’s board.

That statement alone will end this conversation, because you clearly have no idea what you’re talking about in regards to how NCAA players are looked at by NFL scouts/talent evaluators.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

ok break it down for me

how to scouts no where to go ’scouting"?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know where they no to go scouting.

They probably just sort stats on ESPN.com.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

just saying

since you know so many scouts and I obviously have the wrong idea. Tell me how scouts know where to go looking for talent?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Why? I’ll just change my argument next time, right?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

In other words

you can’t support your argument

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

There’s no need to support an argument when the other person won’t even except that it’s viable, and dismisses it out right that the person would just change it the other way around given a different set of circumstances.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

i'm telling you right now on the spot

if you tell me who nfl scouts start looking for talent and it has nothing to do with stats, i will adopt your point of view. no further arguments.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Tell me why Jordan White isn’t in play for a top 10 pick and why Justin Blackmon is.

Then we’ll see where we can go from there.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I never said he wasn't

ok, now I’m ready

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Why is Jordan White a potential top 10 pick?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:40 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I never said he was

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not trying to double talk you

or whatever, I’m just saying that I have no idea what anybody’s board looks like so I can’t say if he’s a top 10 pick or not. I know what you’re getting at by specifically Jordan White, but final stats directly deriving draft order isn’t my argument which is why I keep mentioning Justin Blackmon and not Jordan White.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

You may not be trying, but you are double talking and you are hanging a ton on stats.

Why is Blakmon a top 10 pick and White isn’t?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 11:04 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I never said White isn't

If you’re not gonna tell me just say you’re not gonna tell me. Don’t ask me the same question over and over again.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Why can’t you just answer the question?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I already told why

Because I don’t know if he’s a top 10 because I don’t know what everybody’s board looks like. I’m just waiting on you to tell me how you scout without taking stats into any kind of account. If you’re trying to make a point just make the point.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, his stats are the same as Justin Blackmon. Why shouldn’t he be o everyone’s board as a top 10 pick just like Blackmon?

He’s got the stats, right?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 27, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Why wasn’t Graham Harrell a high draft pick? Or Timmy Chang? Why isn’t Kellen Moore considered a high draft pick?

They all had great stats.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 27, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmmm, being nice

Georgia Tech’s offense is nothing at all like Oklahoma State’s offense. Way I see it, Gene Smith will get one hell of a scouting report from Todd Monken.

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

and I'm not talking the Paul Johnson attack either

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

i agree

that’s why I threw out CJ, but the fairest way for me to do that was to go ahead and say he’s the best of the bunch which I don’t think too many people would dispute.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

to me, receiver is the second biggest positional gamble in the draft

for every Jones and Green, there’s a bunch more Heyward Bays and Demariyous (sp?) Thomases. Sounds familiar don’t it?

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I get where you're coming from.

The entire draft is a crap shoot. But you can’t ignore his production.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I can't get past his measurables

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

which are a problem depending on your tastes

I’d rather see a guy on our team that can flat out play. You can measure all you want but still you have to recognize when a guy can play. Besides, which receiver have we recently drafted that had outstanding measurables? Mike Thomas had speed and build, but he also broke stat records. The biggest hoopla about Dilard was that he could vert through the roof, and even he broke stat records.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not saying stats are everthing

but if the guy can play, the proof is probably gonna be in the pudding. That pudding being stats.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, you’re so misguided when it comes to this it’s funny.

Stats do not equal talent.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Right

Basically, you’ll just dance around the question until the thread is buried. If I’m so misguided why haven’t you been able to answer the question?

Instead of calling people this and that, just give a straight answer. You’ve been dancing around it all day.

Lemme guess, your next post is something about how nobody knows anything and you know everything but you can’t answer a simple question.

I’m so misguided for thinking teams take production into account and production can be represented by stats, right? You provided any real argument to the contrary. If I’m so wrong about it, show me where anything says no NFL team takes any kind of stats into account?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

NFL scouts don’t look at stats when evaluating players for the next level. Their stats are an afterthought.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 27, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Thomas is a good receiver

he’s on running team, and he suffered an achilles injury.

by Ewdtrey on Dec 27, 2011 4:42 AM EST up reply actions  

The Broncos were a passing team last year.

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 29, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Look at speed, vertical, hands

Green and Johnson, along with guys like Fitzgerald, catch everything away from their body and can go up and grab any pass towards them. I haven’t seen Blackmon make the plays that those other players made in college. We can just see how Blackmon is in the NFL and compare later. I’m not saying he’s bad, but he is not Green, Johnson, or Fitzgerald.

by Dwalk1217 on Dec 26, 2011 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Hmmm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voprccSVyz4l

You don’t win the Belitnikoff two times in a row if you can’t catch.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

We should start drafting all these guys who win the Heisman.

AWARD WINNERS, Y’ALL!

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

just saying

who’s rushing to see a dude with 100 targets and 99 drops?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Who’s advocating going with that?

Oh, nobody.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

worked for the Raiders

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

also worked for the Panthers

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

And Falcons, and Cardinals, and Bengals

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:32 AM EST up reply actions  

who's the Heisman winner for the Cards, Bengals and Falcons?

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

not saying Heisman

just saying they drafted guys that put up good stats and it worked for them.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

if only they had a good defense...

I was wrong about Newton. But, I am interested to see if he can maintain his level next season. He is so fun to watch.

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

2 time Belitnikoff winner: Michael Crabtree!
Belitnikoff winner: Golden Tate!
Belitnikoff winner: Mike Hass!
Belitnikoff winner: Braylon Edwards!

In the last 15 years, three Belitnikoff winners have been good/great NFL receivers.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

are those stats you're using?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Are we talking about their NFL production, or using NCAA stats to determine how good they will be as an NFL player?

Let’s not spin it here to make it sounds like I’m saying stats have no use at all, kid.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

"Stats in college mean absolutely nothing"

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Right. They don’t.

So, what did stats in college have to do with me pointing out in the last 15 years there have been less than a handfull of Biletinikoff winners who have been successful NFL receivers again?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

what are they going to draft?

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 25, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

There is NOT a big time receiver that is worth that kind of pick.

Take a big guy with a pick that high. A big time DE or a dominating O-Lineman.

by Ironmanxrs2 on Dec 25, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Aaah yes!!!

Begin the annual “I have the only true crystal ball, so I know exactly what Gene will do” debate! It must be the end of the season.

by moufpuncha on Dec 25, 2011 8:31 AM EST reply actions  

There is no crystal ball. There is logic involved, however.

OH, and actually knowing some of the Jaguars scouts. That helps, too.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 25, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

so they already know how the draft is gonna go?

I have no doubt you know someone that works for the Jags, but I still don’t think you know enough to say the Jags definitely won’t take a receiver with their first pick. Nothing is 100%. And because of that, you can also say nothing is 0%.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 25, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

do you think at this point in time, there is a wideout worthy of a top 5 pick?

Personally I do not.

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 25, 2011 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Well consider that I think Blackmon is as good as Julio Jones and AJ Green

Now he might not be the best receiver in college football. I’m just using him as a comparison. Then, consider the new rookie wage scale and we just had a post listing all the possible draft spots the Jags could get which were 3-7. AJ Green went 4th at $19.6 million. Julio Jones went 6th at $16.2 million. I think we’ll likely draft anywhere from 5 to 7.

Ok, now remember I think Blackmon is as good as the other two. So even if you disagree and say there’s another receiver better than him, I’m guessing you have an absolute stud. All I’m saying is an absolute stud at a position we need in the 5-7th pick range might not be a bad idea. Even when you consider the annual rise in contract numbers from year to year.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I just don't see it. We can agree to disagree

He is a heck of a college receiver. But, in the offense Ok State runs, he will get those catches. Pre injury, I might have considered the kid from Oklahoma a better pro prospect than Blackmon.

I have been wrong before.

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 26, 2011 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Whatever you say, man. Don’t get your hopes up.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 25, 2011 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't get me wrong

I’m not saying the Jags are definitely going receiver with their pick. I’m just saying nobody on this site can absolutely guarantee that they won’t. I wouldn’t be surprised if the went with something else. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the did pick one up. It’s all about what Gene wants to do. And since none of us now what he’s thinking for sure or can tell the future we can’t say 100% what’s gonna go down.

About logic. We can go all day about the logic of draft picks, but we still couldn’t 100% eliminate a receiver. Personally, I think the statement would have been better like this: “There is no crystal ball. There is speculation involved, however.”

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 12:33 AM EST up reply actions  

How do you know I absolutely can’t guarantee it?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

because you won't be drafting for the jags.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

So, it’s not possible that Justin Blackmon isn’t anywhere close to top 5 on the Jaguars draft board?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

i never said that

i said you can’t 100% guarantee they won’t pick a receiver.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Also, if he’s not anywhere near top 5 on their draft board, THEY’RE NOT GOING TO DRAFT HIM.

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Then end all speculation

tell us who they’re drafting.

This post is a product of my humble opinion. If you disagree, simply reply with a counter argument, not a personal attack.

by moufpuncha on Dec 26, 2011 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Why? You’ll just tell me that I cannot know who it will be.

What’s the point?

by Alfie Crow on Dec 26, 2011 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

We need to draft a big explosive DE or a dominating O-Lineman.

If not, trade down and pick up an extra 2nd rounder. We haven’t done a great job at trading down in the past though. It’s almost like other teams don’t want to be dumb and well, the Raiders have already traded their draft picks.

by Ironmanxrs2 on Dec 25, 2011 2:36 PM EST reply actions  

I'd go with the corner from LSU

Keep in mind, unlike last year, the draft is AFTER free agency.

You are banned from Stampede Blue.
You can browse the blog, but you can't participate.

I don't think you took me seriously. If you want it unbanned, email an admin. But, for now, your Stampede Blue privileges are done.

by Joe Fisher on Dec 25, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

What the hell was up with Tasker?

Did Gabbert do his sister? The Guy was absolutely digging for negative comments every chance he got. Yes there were some legit ones, but there where a lot that where BS.

Take stock in your lives, but leave your livestock alone

by MadKow on Dec 26, 2011 8:22 AM EST reply actions  

same thing as Gruden

color guy trying to be polemic to create emotion from the (ignorant) viewers… and/or filling some inferiority complex they have since they don’t get to play any longer

by whaley on Dec 26, 2011 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought

Tasker was more legit when criticizing him, but Gruden already passed judgement on him and just wants to let everyone know about it.

by Ewdtrey on Dec 27, 2011 4:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Cat Country:: Jacksonville Jaguars news, commentary, speculation and fun, all from a fan's perspective

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Chastin West
Small
Brian Robiskie ?
Small
Blaine Gabbert: What Can Be Done? (Part 1)
015_small
My issue with college football
Small
Blaine Gabbert Video Sampler Platter
Small
Interested in joining an all-time NFL mock draft?
Hurricane1_small
2012 Game-by-Game Predictions
Kiwi-new2_small
Mullayo's May 53 man roster
Chester_cheeto_small
The New QB Dilemna
Small
SeminoleKid's 53 man roster

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

77312417837578290_small River City Rage

180103_10150110239888826_529758825_6295646_8155374_n_small Adam Stites

Image_small Alfie Crow

Editor-in-Chief

Img_6121_small silencecs

Contributor

404931_2894108066464_1073166201_32535141_1775032715_n_small CaliforniaJag

32213_924639348222_5111476_51082025_729592_n_small T.Holmes

Twitter_pic_small Shane Clemons

Small Michael Appelbaum

P9260123_small Jagfan89

Cole_small theeCodyTaylor