Jaguars Vote "No" to Kick Off Changes
Yesterday the NFL passed a rule change to kick offs that would move where the ball is kicked from the 30-yard line to the 35-yard line. The Jacksonville Jaguars were one of six NFL teams who voted "No" on the rule change. Three more teams would have needed to vote "No" for the rule to not pass. While Jaguars kicker Josh Scobee quipped "Thank you NFL for the rule change, moving kickoffs to the 35. It'll feel like college again! Bombs away!" on twitter when news came that the rule changed. The Jaguars are one of the teams who aren't very thrilled with the change, nor should they be.
The Jaguars have one of the best all around special teams units in the NFL. It's a unit that sent fullback Montell Owensto his first Pro Bowl as a special teams player and had perennial Pro Bowl special teamer Kassim Osgood as the alternate for Owens spot.
Along with moving the kick off point up 5-yards to the 35-yard line, players on the coverage team can only get a 5-yard running start now as opposed to the previous 15-yards, giving players a total of roughly 45-yards to build momentum. This change will actually put a premium on gunners and special teams aces, as the margin for error becomes larger as less ground is covered in the same amount of time. This area shouldn't be as much of a concern for the Jaguars, as they have a kicker who booms quite a few touchbacks as is, not to mention the Jaguars were one of the best coverage units in the NFL in 2010, ranking 8th in the NFL and 3rd in the AFC in opponents starting field position.
While it puts a premium on gunners, it also devalues kick returners. The number of touchbacks, which remain at the 20-yard line after a tweak in the proposal, will undoubtedly increase. This ultimately hurts teams like the Jaguars, who ranked 15th in the NFL and 8th in the AFC in average starting position (27.1). "It's definitely going to take away from some opportunities as far as guys being able to showcase that phase of the game," Montell Owens told Tania Ganguli of the Florida-Times Union.
As one would expect, Jaguars special teams coach Russ Purnell isn't pleased with the changes.
"I'm an old-timer, so I kind of like the way we got things going right now," Purnell said to the Time-Union before the vote passed. "I hope they don't pass the rule change, myself. I certainly understand player safety, I'm for player safety as much as anybody. And I haven't seen any of the data that they're talking about. ... You're going to eliminate a really, really exciting play; guys like Devin Hester and Percy Harvin and those great returners, you're going to be robbed of that."
The real players it effects the most however, are the players who make their bones as special teams specialists. "I was considered a wedge buster," Owens told the Times-Union. "That's how I kept my job. And I still keep my job. I remember, at the time, I sustained more concussions during the time in which the game allowed the four-man wedges than I do now." The four man wedge has since been outlawed and the NFL considered removing the two man wedge with this rule change, but like the modified touchback being placed at the 25, it was nixed from the proposal.
Players who are now primarily just special teamers will be harder and harder to justify keeping on the final roster, especially if they don't also offer something depth wise on the offensive or defensive side of the ball. Players like Scottie McGee, who spent his rookie season on injured reserve, will have to showcase special (no pun) ability in the return game to warrant a position on the roster because they don't really offer much on the football field. It will also mean teams like the Seattle Seahawks might be ticked at investments they've put in players like Leon Washington. While Washington is one of the NFL's best kick returners, how often will he get a chance to return now?
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't like it.
I don’t know the stats or anything, but my perception is that there is nothing more dangerous than a punt returner looking up at the ball while someone is sprinting at full speed towards him (which BTW is Scotty McGee’s position – which was not affected). Yet, the kickoff is addressed for ‘safety issues’ where that could not occur due to the distance of the kick (maybe it can now?). Everyone has the ability to keep their eyes forward on a kick-off. I guess there are more people colliding, but at least the kick-off players are not as vulnerable as the punt returner.
McGee’s position is effected because he specializes in one thing and offers only one thing, returning kicks. While he was drafted to return punts, Kajim, MJD, Mathis, Thomas, etc can return punts and also offer on-field contributions. How many “special teams” players do you keep?
by Alfie Crow on Mar 23, 2011 8:28 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
His point was that McGee could likely be a decent gunner
I’m not sure I agree; not sure McGee can tackle well enough for that role.
CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSATION
Contributor for Big Cat Country
Follow me on Twitter if you feel like it.
by CaliforniaJag on Mar 23, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually,
my point was that they are trying to make kick-offs safer, but the punt returner is in much more danger than anyone on the kick-off team. For safety’s sake, I would rather see a 3-yd cushion rule on punt’s than this silly change on kick-offs.
My point on McGee was simply that he is a punt returner, not a kick-off returner. We were told when he was drafted that punt returner is a special skill due to the guts required – and he has that skill/guts. They did not change any rules that would eliminate punt returns from the game, so McGee should be keep his roster spot.
by Conservative on Mar 23, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
it's ashame
you’re right, Alfie (never thought you’d see those words in print! j/k) the Dante Halls, White Shoes Johnsons, etc. will not have a chance unless they play for northern outdoor teams. The kickers are just too good anymore. I heard Prosser this morning say the current touchback rate is around 12-16 percent and so what if it increases it to 30-35%? Well, a .300 batting average is pretty damn good.
I can’t help but think this is a rule put in place because of the Everett kid in Buffalo who snapped his neck against Denver a few years back. What’s next, ban the onsides kick?
What I think would be an interesting wrinkle is if the kicker kicks the ball out of the back of the end zone on the fly, the ball gets placed at the 25. Could you imagine the scrums in the end zone?
Here's why I don't think this is a big deal...
first, the 35 is actually not a “new” kickoff spot. That is where kickoffs were made until 1994, when a rule changed it to the 30. Everything was fine before ‘94 and it will be fine now.
Second, as great as our special teams was (is), our opponents starting spot was the 27. If there are more touchbacks, won’t that mean that our opponents are usually starting at the 20? I’m no Vince Lombardi, but I think it is better to have your opponent start at the 20 as opposed to the 27.
Third, I will be glad to see guys who have one skill phased out of the game. On a 53 man roster, I want 53 guys who can contribute in areas besides returning kicks.
I don’t have it in front of me, but I believe it was something like a 20-30% decrease in touchbacks after the change in ’94.
by Alfie Crow on Mar 23, 2011 10:00 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Keep in mind....
there is one other difference with this rule, if I am not mistaken. I would agree that moving the kicker up could lead to more touch backs, but prior to ’94, the ball was placed on the 20 yard line, as it was last season, opposed to the 25 as it will be now. The mentality of kick returns seems to be “run it back if you can get passed the 20, or else down it”. Maybe those 5 yards (placement on the 25 instead of the 20 after a touch back) are not a big deal, but at some point the kicking team is still going to work to stick the opposing team deep in their own territory, and that means not banging the ball out of the back of the end zone.
You are mistaken.
That part of the proposal (as Alfie pointed out) was nixed. Touchbacks will remain at the 20.
From 1991-1993, about 30% of kickoffs resulted in touchbacks, and that number was cut in half from 1994-1996. The touchback rate over the last 3 years has risen slightly since the rule was implemented to about 20% over the last few seasons. If the effect from pre-1994 is reversed, we can expect about 35% touchback rate in 2011 with this change.
(From thebiglead.com)
Don't we WANT the other team to start at the 20???
This rule is advantageous to us. As Alfie pointed out, opponents starting position was the 27…with Scobee’s leg he should have a huge jump in touchbacks. Therefore teams will be starting drives at the 20, instead of the 27. Sounds good to me.
I don't like it.
Personally I found kick returns was exciting to watch. Del Rio is a gambler maybe the special teams can adjust tactics. Seems a shame we worked/drafted/FA-ed hard on special teams to have it nullified a little.
What could of happened; did.

by 






























