Picking Winners (and Losers) in the preseason
Everyone knows the classic football quote "Any given Sunday, anything can happen." It's often nearly impossible to tell which team is going to win any individual game, especially as early as the preseason. However, every year I find myself compiling mental data and making some kind of guess as to a teams performance. Obviously, some teams show trends that need to be considered in picking the number of wins (The Chargers always come on strong in December and young teams have the tendency to collapse. Also, a few stinker teams (Bills and Browns) usually get feisty at the end of the season.) Outside of these trends, there are several signs that I look for in picking preseason teams outside of just the players on the roster. It's not ever going to be a fully reliable system, but then again I did predict an 8-8 season for the Jaguars last year and that the Raiders were going to push for the playoffs...
So what exactly are these signs?
1) All quiet on the training camp front: This is sort of a subordinate part of an umbrella statement I'll make about the offseason. "The teams that will succeed are the teams that are focused fully on football." If a team has to worry about players getting arrested or going to court, making noise in training camp, etc. those are teams that can't put full effort into football. Think about it: when was the last time any Patriots players had serious, public legal problems? Did you hear anything negative about the Packers during camp last year? The Colts? Yes, the Steelers had some trouble last year with Big Ben, but the Steelers are a bit of an exception.2) Preseason trash talking gets you nowhere: Let's face it, NFL football is a surprisingly zen game. It requires some sort of inner calmness. If a player is running around frantically on the field, it leads to over-pursuit and mental errors. If he is too cerebral, he'll play too slow. There has to be a certain balance, an inner calmness and an outer franticness combining to keep players in the moment. Trash talking, giving teams bulletin board material, takes your team out of the moment. You can dislike your opponents, but you cannot be distracted by them, and anything that requires you to talk about another team is a distraction. As Bruce Lee said: "As you think, so shall you become." Teams that think only about being great football teams tend to do better.
(Note on the Steelers: The Steelers are the quintessential smash-mouth team. They talk smack, they hit hard, they get angry. That's part of their MO. They've proven to be exceptions to both of these rules because they feed off of the intensity of their own... rage I guess. Other teams sort of in that smash mouth vein: Jets and Ravens.)
3) When picking losers, follow the loud wide receivers: This was pointed out to me by my brother and I thought he got it exactly right. During the offseason, watch the loud, big name wideouts. Where ever they go, that team will fail. Think about the Bengals, they pick up TO last year, they lose. With Randy Moss last year, the Patriots (who manage to buck this rule) deal him to the Vikings. The Vikings proceed to lose like crazy. Then the Titans pick him up. He does nothing for them either. Braylon Edwards to the Jets was a huge deal a few years ago, now the team doesn't want him back. TJ Houshmanzadeh to the Seahawks, Anquan Boldin to the Ravens, the list goes on and on of teams who have picked up big name wideouts then failed to meet expectations.
4) Support your troops, quarterback especially: I challenge anyone out there to name a playoff team from last year that had a quarterback controversy. Anyone? Anyone? You can't, because it's not possible. Nothing creates fractions and weakness in a team like a roster that can't get behind the guys on the field and support them. Does this mean the QB has to be extraordinary? No. Talk to some Chiefs fans about Matt Cassel. They know and will readily admit that Cassel isn't great. He qualifies as average at best in terms of skills, but no one is calling for his head, and none of the players call him out when he plays badly. He IS their QB even if he isn't a great one.
(Note for Jaguars fans: This is something we need to be very careful about with our team this year. The easiest way to throw away a season entirely is to have a QB controversy. For those who want to restructure Garrard's contract, what you are essentially saying is "We don't really support you as our starter." See the first line of "Support your troops" for why that's a bad thing.)
5) Young, rising players are key at key positions: The Buccaneers are the perfect example of this concept. They have a young, ascending D-line, a young, ascending QB and WR combo. Really that and a pretty good secondary is about 90% of what it takes to get to the playoffs. On the other hand, it doesn't matter if the jerseys say Favre, Williams, Williams or McKinnie if your QB, D-linement and left tackle are 40, 38, 30 and 31 years old. That team was too old to succeed and, lo and behold, the Vikings didn't last year. Not by a long shot.
6) Fear Free Agency: This doesn't mean to cower in fear of free agent pickups, just to approach the free agent market as a skeptic rather than an enthusiast. Jaguars fans were very excited when the team picked up Drayton Florence and Jerry Porter prior to 2008. How'd that work out? Oh yeah, the team is still digging its way out of that mess of a roster. Yes, every now and then, teams will land a Bart Scott to the Jets or a Karlos Dansby to the '09 Cardinals, but more often than not, these things don't tend to work out for the best. A cautious approach to FA is a sign of a team that is building the right way, and a team that sees for itself an ascending roster full of young, drafted players.
Well, that's all I got. Thanks for sticking with me. I know this is a long post, but I think this system can be helpful for those trying to get a feel for how various teams around the league will perform. It's impossible to predict how this season will truly play out, but these principles will be my guide to predicting the upcoming season. Hopefully, these principles will help you decide your 2011 prediction as well.
63 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good points.
I disagree about the restructuring a contract thing though. It has nothing to do with believing in Garrard (or any player who restructures). It’s a matter of freeing up cap space to add a piece to the team for everyones benefit. Many players on many teams take a restructuring to help the team afford a player they think will help. They don’t lose anymoney, they just move it around.
That said, I don’t think Garrard will have to restructure, as it seems we have finished with adding pricey FAs.
Fidelis Ad Mortem
What pieces do we still need to add?
At this point, the only reason to restructure Garrard’s contract is if he’s going to be the backup.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Are you kidding?
Do you believe we have no areas we need to improve? I don’t think we are going to add anyone that would require DG to restructure, but stop acting like it’s some kind of slap in the face -it isn’t. Sanchez was going to restructure to bring in Nnamdi…again, it’s done all the time and has no bearing on a players role.
Again, however, I don’t see any reason DG will need to restructure his contract.
Fidelis Ad Mortem
May I point you to number 6 on my list.
Fear free agency. The Jets are the one team that have defied my system for the last few years. They do things terribly. Too much reliance on FAs, big name but lower production receivers, they talk junk and they’re old. Yet their defense is good enough to compensate.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I am eagerly awaiting the year the Jets implode, and believe you me, it is coming soon. And once it arrives, it will be years and years before that team becomes relevant again.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Before the rookie scale
I think restructuring was a very real option. With Gabbert only counting $3 Mil, there’s not as much going against the QB position as there was (in 2003 dollars) as there was with Brunell ($7M) and Leftwich ($9M).
That being said, Garrard would have to go into Byron vintage 2007 “it’s my team and I know it and I’ll flip the switch when it matters, what do you mean I’m cut” mode for anything drastic to occur.
Absolutely.
In no way am I saying Garrard is going to, or needs to, restructure. There isn’t anyone left out there in FA who I think would necessitate such a move. But restructuring is not a big deal.
Fidelis Ad Mortem
pieces we still need to add
would like some more experience on the D line at the end spot, but I think Lane will be a good one. Some decent depth at LB would be nice as while we have vastly improved that area, we’re one injury to any of the 3 starters from being right back where we were assuming all we did was resign Morrison. In fact, I would not be at all opposed to having Morrison as a backup LB, if the market dictates that is all he is at this stage.
Not on it yet
We’re definitely better than we were this time last year, but what’s that really saying?
And I’m not on the Prosinski bandwagon, I’m buying stock in that Estrada kid! joking.
"The Jaguars starting free safety is already on the roster."
-Gene Smith
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Two out of Greene, Prosisnki, and Landry will be the two starters I guess.
I’m just quoting gene.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions
geez.
Landry is a definite, so between Greene and Prosinski, if Greene wins I think Landry plays FS, if Prosinski wins Landry will play SS. Prosinski has the speed to be a good FS, now he needs to refine his talents.
"thanks for hating"
by rhettchrystal on Jul 31, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't see Prosinski starting this season
He will be great on special teams though.
by SexonvilleShaguars on Jul 31, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Landry will start at SS....
"SALTWATERJAG"
by SALTWATERJAG on Jul 31, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Dont question it
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Real fans don’t need a reason.
Is it finally time to draft a QB?
by TheTealDeal on Jul 31, 2011 3:16 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
This
We are SHALLOW at LB depth….Definitly need to ad a couple more.
"SALTWATERJAG"
by SALTWATERJAG on Jul 31, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
BTW
I’ll be piggybacking on this article to write a little pre-preseason prediction for the 2011 Jaguars. If there’s any other team you’d be interested in getting 2011 predictions for, just let me know and I’ll try to get to it.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
Ooh...
That’s one team I really don’t know much about. I’ll see what I can pull up. I’ll warn you right now though, I really don’t like anyone in that division.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Bradford, Steven Jackson, MSW.........That's it lol
JK…. I hope they do well.
"SALTWATERJAG"
by SALTWATERJAG on Jul 31, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I like the Rams this year
I think they will win their division with an 8-8 or 9-7 record with the Cardinals a close 2nd around 7-9 / 8-8
by SexonvilleShaguars on Jul 31, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
They've had a solid offseason
They added Harvey Dahl and Quentin Mikell to multi-year deals and then added MSW, Al Harris and Zac Diles on short-term deals.
Dahl is on the older side and It’s hard to judge Eagles safeties because they always stay stocked at talent at the CB position which makes a safety’s job easier. Both should be pretty good tho. They’re reaching wildly for receivers (2 drafted plus MSW) which I don’t love, but they’re not counting on those guys too much it seems. MSW and Diles are both low risk, high reward guys. Need some secondary help and honestly, late draft picks and a 36 year old Al Harris won’t do too much this year.
It seems they’re building the right way, though. I think 8-8 would be my guess, mostly because that division stinks. I don’t see them being a serious contender by any means, but they might sneak up and win that division.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I live in NY
Will there be any live feeds up for the Oklahoma drills? Anyone have a camera and ustream? Lol I’m desperate
Who would yall like to see
Go vs each other in the oklahoma tonight?
by amujic32 on Jul 31, 2011 3:45 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Puz and Sesh vs Rackley.
I want to get a look at what he can do with a gaurd if need be.
"SALTWATERJAG"
by SALTWATERJAG on Jul 31, 2011 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with most
Although I would hardly call TJ and Boldin loud receivers. And the support your QB thing is weird to me. Why does everybody need there hand held now a days, smh, you know what game you play, if you don’t perform well you get criticized and possibly replaced. I can almost guarantee you, Manning, Brady and Brees were never sitting in the locker room thinking to themselves “I hope you guys support me”.
by Sylvester.The.Jaguar.fan on Jul 31, 2011 4:18 PM EDT reply actions
If you have to sit in the locker room thinking "I hope they support me"
That’s when a team will have issues. That’s what I’m saying.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions
revised Oklahoma Drill matchups
1. Will Rackley vs. Tyson Alualu.
2. Uche Nwaneri vs. D’Anthony Smith.
3. Zach Miller vs. Scott Lutrus.
4. Daniel Baldridge vs. Larry Hart.
5. John Estes vs. C.J. Mosley
6. Kevin Haslam vs. Marc Scieichl
7. Eben Britton vs. Austen Lane
Can we get somebody from NY???
ClaytonESPN John Clayton
As part of the Jets hectic pace on getting Antonio Cromartie under contract, they are calling around on trades to clear cap room.
Answer the phone Gene!!!
Don’t know why, but Oklahoma Drills were more exciting to me with Vic around. Every year i was looking forward to watching it in the site, now not so much.
"Do I need to be liked? Absolutely not! I like to be liked, I enjoy being liked, I have to be liked. But it's not like this compulsive need to be liked...like my need to be praised." Michael Scott
I think it has to do with how Vic saw and wrote about football. He always likes to talk about football in terms of human confrontation, and what else is the Oklahoma if not that? Love him or hate him, he definitely brings rich and unique viewpoint to his coverage of the sport.
That being said, I don’t think Oehser is doing a bad job.
by Paul Bavington on Jul 31, 2011 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Tania at the TU today
Says the Jags are looking at two options at safety. Landry at FS and Greene at SS or Landry at SS and Prosinski at FS. I get the feeling we will see some of both. Looks like they are going to put the Rookie on the field unless he proves he doesn’t belong there. She also has a quote from Landry that with the ravens he played FS and SS, whichever Ed Reed didn’t want any given play.
Hey Brian
Since I’m too lazy to do the research myself I’ll ask you this question. What is the historical track record of teams whose head coach has been notified is the playoffs or you’re out?
Lot of variables there...
My guess is that the overall results are probably not very good, but there are too many variables involved to properly answer that question. It doesn’t even consider the team’s level of talent.
Basically every coach who is on the hot seat coming into a season could keep his job with a playoff appearance. I will say that there were two coaches in the AFC South last year that were thought to be in “playoffs or get lost” situations, and neither JDR nor Gary Kubiac got fired.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Austen lane during oklahoma
MONSTER
by amujic32 on Jul 31, 2011 9:53 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Me too.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
I'm willing to drink the Kool-ade, but I'm hungry for the truth.
by Brian Levenson on Jul 31, 2011 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions
i was impressed by
Alualu, lane, uche. Hart disappointed me but he isn’t going to over power a giant like baldridge, he’s a quick penetration guy not a mauler. I thought sciechl from Colorado school of mines did well for an udfa. Fun as always.
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Real fans don’t need a reason.
Is it finally time to draft a QB?
by TheTealDeal on Jul 31, 2011 11:39 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Honestly that was boring
There was little excitement compared to when Vic did it, and I couldn’t hear the hitting, because Oesher talked the whole time…
"thanks for hating"
I was field level and it was pretty cool.
Lane and Alualu look great. Gonna be something when the LBs and secondary acquisitions get in there. Shook Kampman’s hand on his way back to the stadium. Was going to get an autograph for my daughter but I just can’t bring myself to get a grown man’s signature.
Offensive Lineman!!!!
Former Arkansas OL Wade Grayson will try out for the Jacksonville Jaguars tomorrow. I’m told no free agent contract has been signed yet

by 






























