53
Viator's Bold Predictions
Offense-
QB: McCown, Gabbert
RB: MJD, Jennings, Karim, Harris
FB: Jones, Owens, Bolen
WR: Thomas, Shorts, Hill, Osgood, Dillard, Newsome
TE: Lewis, Miller, Potter
OT: Monroe, Britton, Whimper, Baldridge
OG: Nwaneri, Rackley, Spitz, Moll
C: Meester
Defense-
DE: Kampman, Mincey, Lane, Roth, Morgan
DT: Alualu, Knighton, Douzable, Collins
LB: Smith, Posluszny, Session, Allen, Bosworth
CB: Mathis, Cox, Coleman, Middleton, Rutland
S: Landry, Greene, Prosinski, Issac
Special-
PK: Scobee
P: Turk
LS: Ingram
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Looks like Alfie's list
but you cut Garrard and added Morgan.
I think Garrard doesn’t get cut like everyone is hyping right now
by SexonvilleShaguars on Sep 2, 2011 12:58 PM EDT reply actions
ahhh
so Alfie copied you then :)
I think most of the roster is obvious, but you went with Newsome over Inman before Inman was let go so looks like you were right on that one.
I think one question is will Harris be on the actual roster and not practice squad. 7 tailbacks is pretty deep
by SexonvilleShaguars on Sep 2, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
You must be positive Garrard's getting cut,
just like you were positive the Jaguars were drafting Tebow. Not gonna happen.
I like to watch.
Doesn't mean he is wrong
It could very well happen. I’ll make a bet with you… 10-1 odds that he gets cut. I lose, I donate one game ticket to the USO. You lose, 10 game tickets to the USO.
DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAL!
by DownTownJax on Sep 2, 2011 5:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
i like this style of betting
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Real fans don’t need a reason.
Is it finally time to draft a QB?
by TheTealDeal on Sep 3, 2011 9:22 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
not gonna happen
such a brilliant move.
man i sure am glad because he sure played terrible last night . that 43 yard touchdown pass was thrown so bad only the wr could catch i.t man he is terrible
.if he had been drafted by our team david could have helped him learn to throw the ball at least 15 feet ahead of his wr so it would be easier for more people to catch the bal
l and that 60% accuracy thing thats gotta stop . it no fun everyone catching the ball everytime you throw it
Yeah, he killed it against those third teamers in a preseason game. Gene blew it, for sure…
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~Carl Sagan
not gonna happen
man i am sure happy gene must have searched high and low get us the future hall of famer in cecil shorts
garrard is good
when he has blocking, when he doesnt he rushes throws, and squeezes in throws that sometimes lead to picks, in 07 he had the blocking, he had the time, made the right throws.
"thanks for hating"
McNabb's downfall was a weak Eagle's o-line as well
I was never an eagle fan, but I did have McNabb one year on my fantasy team. It was painful to watch, he was getting beat up every play, he couldn’t make any passes and was forced to scramble more than he would’ve liked.
I don’t think McNabb ever truly recovered from the 3-4 years of weak Eagle O-line that really put a hurtin to him.
by SexonvilleShaguars on Sep 2, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
What if there is no time?
Sometimes there is no time. Your O-line may fail you. You’ll have to be quick. Quick to see the field, quick to decide, quick to deliver. And/or be tough as hell. David is definitely tough as hell.
JD Chambers
Garrard
is quicker to see the field than blaine gabbert most likely.
"thanks for hating"
by rhettchrystal on Sep 2, 2011 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll give Gabbert
the props for getting rid of the ball quicker on most occasions. But because knows the offense better he can get to his 2nd and 3rd receiver quicker.
Matter of time
They’re not far apart now. One has reached his ceiling, the other has one foot on the threshold. I’m not one to hesitate…
JD Chambers
by viator on Sep 3, 2011 6:47 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Leftwich was good when he had time too...
If I recall correctly, that was part of the rationale that the Garrard faithful used when calling for Leftwich’s head. Garrard was able to escape the pressure while Leftwich couldn’t.
Garrard got lucky in ‘07…a lot. It’s time to move on. Let the kid play.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~Carl Sagan
by JLydon37 on Sep 2, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
On that note
I’m all for giving the kid the nod. “Ready” or not. I’d say he’s nearly as “ready” as the starter. Either way, you can’t keep DG.
JD Chambers
Leftwich
was also injury prone.
"thanks for hating"
by rhettchrystal on Sep 2, 2011 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions
With that depth at tackle, I hope Monroe and Britton stay healthy
You can't reason with unreasonable people.
If you ain't first, you're last.
Moll can play tackle
Might have Bradfield and Grayson on PS. That’s all there are, bro. Work with what ya have.
JD Chambers
He's insinuating that the players behind Monroe/Britton suck
I agree with him; they do.
Head Editor of JaguarsBlog
Follow me on Twitter
by CaliforniaJag on Sep 2, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course they do
But that’s all I have to choose from. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.
JD Chambers
Moll
is horrible. I’d rather have Whimper be the first in at RT or LT. Next IMO should be Bradfield.
I like Bradford alot
frankDUBZ
"I'm smacking you with the truth......" - Me
by FRANKdubz on Sep 3, 2011 12:51 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
errrrr Vradfi
frankDUBZ
"I'm smacking you with the truth......" - Me
by FRANKdubz on Sep 3, 2011 12:51 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
*Bradfield
Lmao
frankDUBZ
"I'm smacking you with the truth......" - Me
by FRANKdubz on Sep 3, 2011 12:53 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Thought about Bradfield
Over Baldridge, but I figured experience gave the latter a slight edge.
JD Chambers
Garrard
If Garrard gets cut, can we say he got Leftwiched??

by 



























