Gameplan: No MJD

by mab0270 on Sep 26, 2011 7:16 PM EDT

I was thinking about the gameplan that was used on Sunday against the Panthers, and it occurred to me that I was taking MJD's contributions to this offense for granted. We just assume that he will be there every Sunday, pounding through the opposing team's defense. Even though most of us thought that the run, run, run gameplan was boring and/or conservative, the game could have been a lot worse if MJD wasn't racking up yards...or would it?

How would our season look if we didn't have MJD on the team? What if we didn't draft him at all?

Would it have changed our drafting strategy in the past few years? Would we have given up on Garrard earlier? Would we have had a worse record in the the past few seasons, resulting in higher draft picks and more playmakers?

I'm a big fan of MJD, and he's obviously our best player on offense right now, but I just think this scenario is interesting to think about.

If we didn't have as strong of a running game after Freddy T, maybe we would have built toward a passing centered offense. Maybe we would have lost a few more games in 2006, and picked up Darrelle Revis or Patrick Willis instead of Reggie Nelson in 2007. As food for thought, here are some of the players who were drafted somewhat close to our draft positions:

2006:

Draft Order	Player Selected
42	Danieal Manning
43	Roman Harper
50	Marcus McNeill
52	Greg Jennings

2007:

Draft Order	Player Selected
11	Patrick Willis
14	Darrelle Revis
37	Eric Weddle
44	Sidney Rice

2008:

Draft Order	Player Selected
12	Ryan Clady
16	Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie
49	DeSean Jackson
55	Ray Rice

Obviously, I picked the "hits" as examples instead of the "busts". We could have ended up with Vernon Gholston or Jarvis Moss (or Reggie Nelson or Derrick Harvey). I just think it's interesting to look back and see some of the names that were being mentioned in free agency this year as players who we were interested in, who may have been available close to the position that we could have drafted in if we had done a little worse in 06, 07, and 08.

I think that we probably would have drafted a new quarterback earlier than we did (maybe Flacco?). Our running game would have become anemic as we tried to squeeze a few more years out of Fred Taylor, but our secondary might have gotten a little better.

Please keep in mind that these questions are posed just to make you think about the scenario. I'm not saying that I wish MJD wasn't drafted, or that I wish we would have drafted someone else. I just find it amazing how much MJD has affected the direction and success of the franchise all by himself.

How do you think the team would have changed?

Tweet Comment 4 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

About Revis

If I recall correctly, the Jags had a trade in place with Pitt to move up and get Revis. Then he went to the Jets earlier, and the trade was off. The Jags really wanted him badly from what I recall.

by Jagsrok9008 on Sep 26, 2011 7:45 PM EDT reply actions

that may have saved shack

"thanks for hating"
"Give it up now before its too late!…. CJ will be shut down? Nevermind, its already too late." AZ TiTan10

Follow Me On Twitter

by rhettchrystal on Sep 26, 2011 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions

If they picked Revis, do you think they still would have concentrated on pass rush in the 2008 draft? Revis is a rare corner who can cover for a long time, so maybe pressuring the QB wouldn’t have been as much of an emphasis.

by mab0270 on Sep 26, 2011 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions