Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Jaguars Simply Lost Faith in David Garrard

Realistically, the only surprise in the move that the Jacksonville Jaguars made to release former starting quarterback David Garrard was the timing of it. I was half waiting for a press conference to be announced on Saturday afternoon, but didn't think the team had to cuts to pull the plug again, like they did prior to the 2007. Something happened between Saturday and yesterday afternoon however, that made head coach Jack Del Rio and general manager Gene Smith say enough is enough.

"He just wasn't able to get it going this preseason," Jack Del Rio told the media in his press conference yesterday. "He even admitted that when we talked today. For whatever reason he has just not been able to find a rhythm, not been able to be his old self. And so with that being the case, we decided to let him go," added Del Rio.

Star-divide

At some point in the last two seasons, Jack Del Rio and the Jaguars front office lost faith in David Garrard. Mark Long of the Associate Press was on with 1010XL last night discussing the move, and he felt like Jack Del Rio was done with David Garrard after the overtime loss to the Washington Redskins, where Garrard had an abysmal game that was capped off by throwing a bad interception on his own side of the field in overtime. Prior to that, Long speculated that if Luke McCown had not been injured in relief duty against the San Diego Chargers early in 2010, he probably would have started going forward after that game. I'm inclined to agree with Long, and said as much most of last season and this offseason.

Gerald Alexander, a member of the Jaguars from 2008 to part of 2010 tweeted yesterday that quite a few players felt like Luke McCown would have won the starting job last season, had their been a legitimate competition for the position. I've had a handful of other players tell me as much in private, as well. Simply put: The team as a whole, lost faith in David Garrard as their starting quarterback. That became obvious when Garrard was not selected as a team captain and in some post-release quotes from players. "I don't think there was any confidence to be lost," one player told Mark Long when asked about Garrard's release yesterday. In Jay Glazer's report, he noted that players were not shocked by the move and felt like it was inevitable.

It also didn't help Garrard in the locker room that he seemed to point fingers at an increasing rate. "It's not always my fault, but that's how it reads in the paper," Garrard said during training camp. An easy way to lose a locker room is to play poorly and blame everyone else.

During training camp and the preseason this year, David Garrard was once again outplayed by Luke McCown, even though McCown had limited snaps. Something was off with Garrard from the get-go, however. If you remember early in training camp, I said I felt like Garrard was pressing and making more mistakes than he typically did trying to make plays happen. It was obvious he felt the pressure for his job and at some point, it felt like he was resigned to the fact that losing his job was inevitable.

"Healthy competition is OK," Garrard told USA Today a few weeks ago. "If I do my job well, I don't have to worry about anything else. If I do that, and they still want me to move on? There are still 31 other teams out there."

The pressure to keep his job clearly got to David Garrard. You could tell in the games he pressed, he tried to make things happen, and he tried to hit on throws he simply can't make.

"What it really came down to is, I gave David Garrard every opportunity to show us what we had seen before," Del Rio said yesterday. "What made him the starter in the first place, and he just couldn't get it going."

"It was an evaluation thing," general manager Gene Smith said at the press conference. Even after final cuts on Saturday, the team was still evaluating it's roster. The team evaluates a lot of tape leading up to final cuts, so it's possible in the evaluation process, it just hammered home how poor David Garrard was in the preseason. Not only in the preseason, but in practice Garrard just couldn't get it going. Tania Ganguli of the Florida Times-Union tweeted yesterday, that in Monday's practice Garrard had been intercepted three times. It's possible after that practice and during the evaluation process, everything just came to a head.

In the end, the team just didn't feel like David Garrard gave them the best chance to win. The only surprise was the timing of the release, not the release itself. Ideally, if there had not been a lockout and the team had had proper time to evaluate McCown's repaired knee and get Blaine Gabbert into mini-camp and OTA's, the move very likely would have happened before training camp had even began.

Comment 76 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Too bad espn can't research this kind of stuff

They believe it is 100% financial and that we have forfeited any chance to be competitive this year.

Respect My Authoritah

by duuuvaaalll on Sep 7, 2011 8:16 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

We may never know what the final straw was.....

but I agree they gave him every chance to prove himself, and I agree with that approach. I do not think it was a financial decision, but simply a football decision, and I am not just saying that because Gene and Jack said it in the press conference yesterday. I just do not see $8 million as a reason to tank a season. I truly believe that the coaches of the Jaguars feel that we will have a better chance to win this Sunday, and going forward, if Luke is under center opposed to David. It will be interesting to see if he is picked up by any other team. I think it would be funny if he went to the Steelers to replace the broken armed Leftwich in the back-up role. Talk about a parallel carer! In any event, I sure thank DG for the effort, and wish him the best, and I look forward to the calls of “LUKE” on Sunday. Go Jags!

by GAJAGFAN on Sep 7, 2011 8:23 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

The final straw was most likely the three picks in Monday’s practice. They gave him a chance all the way to the point where they would save a few dollars. The “bad” timing actually showed some lingering belief in him, and respect.

by iodrew on Sep 7, 2011 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

You are most likely right....

and by no means am I saying that the Jags should not save $8 million if they can, but if the team thought he at all could help them win, he would still be a Jag. As far as the interceptions in practice, and I have never played QB a day in my life, it sure looked like guys were open in the game Thursday night that David did not see. I am sure it is much easier to see those things from section 435 then with someone breathing down your neck, but as an NFL QB, I am sure he should be able to do that.

by GAJAGFAN on Sep 7, 2011 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Something happened between Saturday and Yesterday...

Gene: “David your gonna have to take a pay cut”
David:“No, I’m good”
Gene: “No, your average! Play book, Thanks”

by thegoodz on Sep 7, 2011 8:45 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Weaver can use Garrard's salary...

to buy up the unsold seats this year. i’ll take two to Indy. Club seats work for me.

by GrubAtPublix on Sep 7, 2011 8:46 AM EDT reply actions  

If

Section 442, RIP
"You think you know, but you don't know."

by unhipcat on Sep 7, 2011 9:25 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It would be better

if fans bought tickets.

Section 442, RIP
"You think you know, but you don't know."

by unhipcat on Sep 7, 2011 9:26 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Do you have a link for this Joe?

I saw someone elese comment this and I’d love to see it in print.

by CheapSeat on Sep 7, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Link this!

Don’t have a link, did see the comment somewhere, think it was on tv last night. I don’t know that the org would publicly divulge that out of ahem… respect for David.

by Joe Fisher on Sep 7, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Respect for David?

What about Luncheongate? That was the worst treatment any human has ever suffered…ever.

Fidelis Ad Mortem

by JPQ! on Sep 7, 2011 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

you see my tweet to Hicken?

here’s how the luncheon went down.

The Turk dressed as a waiter comes up to David and says "Excuse me, Mr. Garrard? Table 1 would like a word with you. "

Meanwhile a stealthy busboy with a scraggly beard and a St. Louis Cardinals ballcap removes his place setting.

by Joe Fisher on Sep 7, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Seinfield!

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Is it finally time to draft a QB?

by TheTealDeal on Sep 7, 2011 1:53 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Very nice piece

Maybe the best I have read by Alfie, and without a doubt the best I have seen on this situation. This article brought it all together.

by cathousecrazy on Sep 7, 2011 8:48 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

except for the grammatical errors... sure

i’m not usually one to hassle people about spelling and such, but this will be the one time i say something. i’m not sure if ur paid for what u write…. even if it’s candy bars or beard combs… but it took me two minutes to read it.

by GrubAtPublix on Sep 7, 2011 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Irony?

… that’s sort of like bronzy and silvery, right?

by KeithG on Sep 7, 2011 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Irony would be unexpected

A comment complaining about spelling and grammar that contains bad spelling or grammar? That’s par for the course.

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAL!

by DownTownJax on Sep 7, 2011 9:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

It looks like

he’s up really early, everyday, providing inside information not available elsewhere. I don’t mind a few grammatakal errors today. If you want consistent grammatakal errors, which you won’t see here, see Local6 News Orlando.

by iodrew on Sep 7, 2011 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

that

is so freakingg true. I hardly watch/read the news, but they are terrible

Follow Me On Twitter @Matt_Hoffman28

by Jagmania28 on Sep 7, 2011 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ur a sticker for proper grammar.

U demand everyone adhere to ur strict rules of ellipses instead of commas, not capitalizing the pronoun I, and using U and Ur instead of you and you’re.

Really?

Fidelis Ad Mortem

by JPQ! on Sep 7, 2011 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

if i was being posted on the front page with a press pass..

i’d bring it a lil more. besides, i don’t capitalize and i use common truncations for pronouns. he’s got sentence fragments and things that just don’t make sense but pass a word spellcheck… .HUGE difference.

by GrubAtPublix on Sep 7, 2011 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Alfie writes like 6-10 articles a day.. sometimes more

and its not a matter of quantity over quality.

He gets these things out fast. As soon as I hear about a news story, I hit refresh on BCC and blam, lo and behold, a full article with opinions and insights written by none other than Alfie “the boss” Crow.

But send in a grammatically perfect written complaint and I’m sure he’ll refund you your 2 minutes.

by SexonvilleShaguars on Sep 8, 2011 5:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Although I fee the move was justified.....

Alfie, do you believe that due to the draft timing this year, the possibility existed that the Jags were going to cut DG regardless and that they were just waiting till the last minute to prevent potential division rivals from acquiring him. I mean after they drafted Gabbert that knew that they were moving on eventually and Tenn was looking for a QB, Houston didnt have a reliable backup signed just yet and we all are aware of the Colts QB situation although that became more critical later in preseason. No proof to back this up but just food for thought.

by cbjags on Sep 7, 2011 8:51 AM EDT reply actions  

i think it's possible that the situation surrounding manning

had a major impact on the timing. look at what they gave collins. dave would’ve worked for that for an opportunity to stick it to the jags for 2-4 weeks.

by GrubAtPublix on Sep 7, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Most teams release veterans earlier to give them a chance to

find work elsewhere. Sort of a consolation prize. But this year, Free Agency occurred after the draft which is the only reason I posed the possibility. As we all know, you cant always take what is said in public at face value.

by cbjags on Sep 7, 2011 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

No. The division knows what he is.

Fans value of Garrard as a starter is significant higher than the leagues value.

by Alfie Crow on Sep 7, 2011 9:06 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Inquiring doesn’t mean a lot.

Garrard’s value is as a back up.

by Alfie Crow on Sep 7, 2011 10:41 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Kuharsky

Already said in a post that the Titans were not high on Garrard at all, and have no sense of relief that he’s not playing Sunday.

Follow Me On Twitter @Matt_Hoffman28

by Jagmania28 on Sep 7, 2011 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what to think.

But if they had been lost faith in him, they should’ve been done something about it. They say they gave him every chance to keep his job, but did they? I’m not so sure. But what’s done is done, so GO JAGS!!!

by kjones407 on Sep 7, 2011 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

How are getting a chance...

when almost everytime you drop back, someone is in your face? No QB is going to be able to perform at their best with that type of pressure. If I was a QB and I had to be concerned about getting killed almost every play, it’d be hard to play with any confidence. The line game him no chance at all.

by kjones407 on Sep 7, 2011 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seeing as he got the majority of 1st team snaps in training camp

and started all the preseason games with the ones, I would say yea they gave him every chance.

Respect My Authoritah

by duuuvaaalll on Sep 7, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying...

that he didn’t play bad, because he did. But maybe all of you can tell me what how well he was supposed to do with the constant pressure he was under by the opposing defense. I’m not trying to defend him being cut, I just don’t like the way it happened. If his last practice was the last straw, then fine, but from what I seen in the preseason; I’m not sure if the situation was evaluated properly.

by kjones407 on Sep 7, 2011 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was the starter all preseason

How is that not enough of a chance. He sucked and he lost his job because of it. I love DG but he wasn’t playing like an NFL qb.

by Dwalk1217 on Sep 7, 2011 9:09 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not to mention

The fact that Jack called Dave in 2 weeks ago, and told him to get his head out of his ass. That’s more than a wake up call and a chance my friend.

Follow Me On Twitter @Matt_Hoffman28

by Jagmania28 on Sep 7, 2011 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

More logical explanation is 3 interceptions in practice

It made sense as to why they cut him 3 days after the 53 man roster cut down. Garrard was most likely going against the scout team defense, who was running the defensive concepts of the Titans defense. After not throwing a TD in the preseason and struggling against the scout team defense during game week, it will be foolish to think he can turn it around. Its a division game!!! If he threw 3 against the scout team, he will throw 6 interceptions versus the real Titans defense

by True Jag on Sep 7, 2011 9:05 AM EDT reply actions  

I must apologize...

I don’t remember on what article or who the commenter was, but someone said we should cut Garrard and start McCown. I replied saying there is no way that happens and if we do cut Garrard, Gabbert will be the starter.

Props to whoever that was, I have been proven wrong!

twitter - @jeffrojag

by Gabbert2Shorts on Sep 7, 2011 9:05 AM EDT reply actions  

I think McCown2Shorts is still available!

by thegoodz on Sep 7, 2011 9:08 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I said that

But I think there were at least a few others

by rusty904 on Sep 7, 2011 10:12 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I said that too...

I didn’t imply that cutting Garrard and starting McCown HAD to happen, but that it should be a possibility…i think it was on that poll about starting Gabbert or Garrard.

"Do I need to be liked? Absolutely not! I like to be liked, I enjoy being liked, I have to be liked. But it's not like this compulsive need to be liked...like my need to be praised." Michael Scott

by Hellveto on Sep 7, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I believe viator....

…said that in the post of his 53 man roster a week or so ago.

by whazaaap on Sep 7, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice article

I’ve been a supporter of Garrard, but he clearly wasn’t playing very well. I’m not terribly suprised by the loss of confidence in him to take this team forward.

Either way, I’m putting my full support behind Luke now… and behind Blaine when he gets his shot at being the starter.

by KeithG on Sep 7, 2011 9:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Dirk Koetter and Mike Sheppard are the happiest

Once the offense takes the field, you will see how Garrard limited this offense. We are still going to run the ball, but Luke can do more in the passing game than David

by True Jag on Sep 7, 2011 9:28 AM EDT reply actions  

My problem with the move is....

My problem with the move is that this is less about McCown and Gabbert than it is about Garrard. This move was made not because one of the others looked like a star, but because Garrard looked pretty bad. I know that McCown looked better in practices and against 3rd/4th string players. But I really believe it was more about Garrard not playing worth $9M, if he was due to make let’s say Gabbert’s salary we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

I feel like as a fan that I haven’t seen enough of McCown other than a few practices when they were open and his limited appearances in games. I really, really hope I’m wrong and this is more about McCown showing he’s ready or even better that Gabbert is showing he’ll be ready sooner rather than later.

Because isn’t that the best of all worlds, if Gabbert is just a few short weeks away then that is ALL GOOD for this team. Here’s to hoping.

In Gene I trust because I really have no other choice.

by Atl- Jags Fan on Sep 7, 2011 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

He seriously was

The 1st round QBs were David Carr (1), Joey Harrington (3), and Patrick Ramsey (32). There was also Josh McCown in the 3rd round; Rohan Davey to the Patriots in the 4th round 9 picks after Garrard; Randy Fasani, Kurt Kittner, Brandon Domanm and Craig Nall in the 5th round; J. T. O’Sullivan and Steve Bellisari in the 6th; and some others that don’t matter after that. Considering the Jaguars got one great year (best offense in team history statistically), three inconsistent but with a generally above-average …average… overall years, and the only playoff victory not from the Brunell era, I’d say that’s pretty good value for a 4th round pick. And he’s absolutely the best Class of 2002 QB.

I like to watch.

by MoveThoseChains on Sep 7, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's Go Time

Hilariously, that Jaguars Ad in the link for me is the “It’s Go Time” picture with Garrard throwing the football.

by whaley on Sep 7, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

This matter was one of the fewest i agreed with Alfie from the beginning to end. Some people wanna lable any critics of Garrard as hating on him or whatever.
Who started this “THE _ IS OUR QB AND WE SHOULD SUPPORT HIM REGARDLESS…”? I don’t care for what numbers says, good or bad, i trust my eyes on that. And in these years he started we had hopes Garrard would turn out to be Elite after the 2007 season, but after that he was nothing more than a mediocre QB for us, he had good and really bad games and never could find consistency on his play. Why should we be fine with a mediocre QB as our starter?

That was a decision to move forward as they gave Garrard all the chances to show why he got there in first place, that 2007 Garrard with that upside, but then he looked worse than ever.
Sunday and through weeks forward we may find out that Luke is way worse than Garrard, which doesn’t mean we should have kept David… means we need to try Gabbert and if in the next few years this doesn’t work, find another solution…to me is that simple.

"Do I need to be liked? Absolutely not! I like to be liked, I enjoy being liked, I have to be liked. But it's not like this compulsive need to be liked...like my need to be praised." Michael Scott

by Hellveto on Sep 7, 2011 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Now all the haters are saying this is prep for a Jags move to LA

"Prepare yourself, you know it's a must, you've gotta have a friend in Jesus." -Norm Greenbaum

by VoiceOfBC on Sep 7, 2011 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Cat Country:: Jacksonville Jaguars news, commentary, speculation and fun, all from a fan's perspective

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Jacksonvillejaguars2_small
Jaguars 2012 my opinion
Small
Chastin West
Small
Brian Robiskie ?
Small
Blaine Gabbert: What Can Be Done? (Part 1)
015_small
My issue with college football
Small
Blaine Gabbert Video Sampler Platter
Small
Interested in joining an all-time NFL mock draft?
Hurricane1_small
2012 Game-by-Game Predictions
Kiwi-new2_small
Mullayo's May 53 man roster
Chester_cheeto_small
The New QB Dilemna

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

77312417837578290_small River City Rage

180103_10150110239888826_529758825_6295646_8155374_n_small Adam Stites

Image_small Alfie Crow

Editor-in-Chief

Img_6121_small silencecs

Contributor

404931_2894108066464_1073166201_32535141_1775032715_n_small CaliforniaJag

32213_924639348222_5111476_51082025_729592_n_small T.Holmes

Twitter_pic_small Shane Clemons

Small Michael Appelbaum

P9260123_small Jagfan89

Cole_small theeCodyTaylor