2012 NFL Draft: Top 10 draft order set

we are going to get at least one big star WR in FA so don’t worry. Taking a WR in the first would be a bad idea considering how deep this draft is. OL is the way to go to get the best bang for your buck.

but I would honestly only take him if we get lucky in FA and pick up two WRs and a starting caliber OL or DE. It would be a perfect Gee pick and it is not like Poz and Session are always healthy.

We aren’t going to draft a guy with the seventh pick of the draft to a position that we have arguably the best RB in the NFL… I don’t want to take carries away from him and we need OL help more. Plus, I don’t think anyone could see Gene taking a RB in the first.

Is this the same jeffery that is supposed to be challenging blackmon for the first wr taken. Do a little bit of research next time will you.

Wouldn’t you rather, say sign Carl Nicks, a 26 y/o premium Guard than use number 7 overall on a guard. OLB would be a luxury pick for us….when healthy, sessions is barely on the field as our scheme is more nickle-based. Kirkpatrick….maybe, but he’s no Claiborne.

What I’d really like to see is Reiff. He’ll be the second/third tackle taken, so his cost will be appropriate for a RT, there’s nothing available in FA, there’s not a lot of depth at tackle this year, and most of all, I think he’s going to be a great RT who may even push Monroe for LT down the line.

Monroe-Nicks-?-?-Reiff; with ? being settled between Nwarni, Meester, Rackley, Spitz and Britten. That’s a lot of young, great to elite talent at 3 spots, and a couple young and veteran guys that are at least solid at the other 2. We could survive off that line for years, or draft a center high in the following years and make the line elite. Let’s get that aspect of the offense taken care of, so we can focus on our receivers in the rest of a very deep class.

we are set at the rest of our OL positions but as long as we address OL Ill be happy.

I know we want to, but OL roll downhill forever with injuries and lack of production, no matter how young. Don’t get me wrong…I’d love to be wrong, here, but I don’t see Britton making a starting impact on this team next year.

As his trigger finger, not as Vic described it, exactly. Rank em’, list ‘em, pick ’em may be true, but if you’re only ranking and listing the guys you scouted…the guys who are comprised 75% of need positions, it can give a very confusing result of BAP.

I think Gene scouts certain positions all the way to the colorado school of mines…to find the very best at each position and rank them against each other to help facilitate the best by position. Then, he and his scouts have a list of other players that have caught their attention throughout the year. Gene himself said in one of Vic’s last articles that the position matters in his consideration of Value, and why shouldn’t it?

Ever notice we like to draft a lot of guys at the same position? I think this is why. That’s why we grab guys that are either exact needs or guy that belong to a deep class. I think Gene is good at figuring this stuff out, and knows he could be passing up other guys in the mean time.

Here’s how I think this is different from needs based drafting.
It’s pretty safe to assume he’s scouted WRs, CBs, OL and DL (I think OL and DL will always be scouted by him, btw). Come each of our picks, I think the logic is that there will be a guy from one of these positions at each of our picks, so that no matter where we pick we should have a BAP need selection. Punter is another need and a much smaller group of guys, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a punter, as well.