Thoughts on Mike Mularkey hire
During the four years that Mike Mularkey was the offensive coordinator for the Falcons, the team scored 382 points more than the Jaguars. The 2011 Falcons set a franchise record for offensive yardage in a season. Despite all this, Falcons fans were almost unanimous in their excitement to see the offensive coordinator that presided over this offense leave the team.
Apparently, Mularkey was to blame for losses in the first round of the playoffs for the Falcons in three of the last four years. Most recently, he was the scapegoat for the fans after the Falcons were only able to score two points on the Giants and were eliminated from the playoffs.
Perhaps, Mularkey was to blame and his stale offense cost the Falcons a potential Super Bowl run, or perhaps, and more likely in my eyes, the Falcons fans are in denial that they are rooting for a team that chokes in big games annually.
The Falcons offense was unable to convert on two 4th & one attempts and were stopped for a loss on a 3rd & one. Maybe I'd consider blaming the play caller if he decided to go with a double reverse or something cutesy, but that wasn't the case. Two of the three plays consisted of Matt Ryan sneak attempts and one was a Michael Turner power run up the middle.
None of the plays worked. Mularkey was to blame for an offense that, as a unit, couldn't get a single yard on three attempts. His quarterback, Matt Ryan, who posted a 92.2 quarterback rating for the 2011 season and threw the 6th most touchdowns in the NFL, finished the game against the Giants with a 71.1 rating and zero touchdown passes.
So unless Mularkey decided to change his offensive philosophy for the playoffs, I find it difficult to believe that he is to blame for an offense scoring 25 points a game during the regular season and looking entirely inept in the postseason.
But with an offensive coordinator that will reportedly take over the play calling duties, I'm really not that concerned with the plays he called in Atlanta. What's much more important to me is the development players made under his tutelage. It's difficult to know what a player like Matt Ryan would be like had he never been coached by Mularkey, but by all accounts he's a better player because of it.
If Mularkey can find similar success grooming Blaine Gabbert then it will be a good hire for the Jaguars. If not and Gabbert fails as a quarterback in Jacksonville, it wouldn't be all that surprising to see Mularkey's, Gabbert's and Gene Smith's times all come to a close with the team.
42 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
found it funny
that Mularkey, Gene Smith, and Gabbert all have 3 years left on their contracts.
Can't stand the truth?
When Gene got the extension
I did note that I thought it coincided with the end of Gabbert’s contract. Let’s hope they both earn extensions.
Nice job
I like the perspective
by frankdatank101 on Jan 11, 2012 11:10 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Adam - right on target
Thanks for the fresh and original thinking
Big Cat Country!:: The Official Home of the Unofficial Blog of the Jacksonville Jaguars!
Good job Adam
Like I’ve been telling our fans here who dislike the hire bc Atlanta’s failures in the posted season, specifically his last game as O.C. … Players, not plays.
by Jags85 on Jan 11, 2012 11:45 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Nice article.good perspective.
by SFGOJAGS on Jan 12, 2012 12:16 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
I wouldn't be so quick to tie all three together.
If Gabbert ends up sucking again it may just be Gabbert. Let’s not make this a situation where the QB ends up getting all the coaches fired. Hopefully he develops, We definitely need to send him to tough camp though.
New owner, new coach, and a new QB!
What else new can we get.
by JagSoldier on Jan 12, 2012 1:13 AM EST via mobile reply actions
More new fans!
A new stadium that fits the size of the team not the gator bowl/ FLA GA/ Monster Truck shows. I think that the team stays for most of the rest of the lease but the real question I have about the team leaving is when the Stadium gets old and new one needs to be built, will the community dish out more cash to keep the Jags here or will they look for $greener$ pastures in other places?
A new batch of WR
Thats really all thats needed. Blaine proved he can be accurate, you just have to get open and catch the ball. Chastin West was sorry.
by childintime12 on Jan 12, 2012 10:02 AM EST up reply actions
After going 0-3 in the playoffs, somebody had to be the scapegoat.
However, I don’t think Mularkey’s play calling doomed the Falcons against the Giants. It was the O-line’s inability to control the line of scrimmage. Unless Mularkey could block JPP, the Falcon’s losing falls entirely on the players.
by Charles Monsoon on Jan 12, 2012 1:29 AM EST reply actions
If we are basing our coaching search on the last game that they coached or playoff experince
then almost all of the potential candidates would have come from a loss or most likely from a team that hardly made the playoffs.
I like Mularkey,I think that Gene needed a coach that fit the personnel that he was bringing in. I see similarities in the Jags organization and the Falcons. Playoff records are a dumb way to evaluate coaches. For one, Chud (OC Carolina), the guy I hear most people clamoring for is just a stats guy and his team didn’t make the playoffs. Secondly, the falcons were the 10th ranked on offense. 3rd, he will not be the play caller. 4th he looks like Kevin Costner, 5th his team made it to the playoff the past three years and to the best record in the regular season in 2010 only to lose to a Hot QB in Aaron Rodgers. This past year his team lost in the post season because the Giants are a better team. I think that coaching usually can get a team a few plays a game and maybe a few wins but to say that the Falcons lost in the playoffs because of Mularkey is a bunch of you guessed it Mularkey.
by Jewasaurus on Jan 12, 2012 1:38 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Mularkey
We will do better with this guy as our O C , Gene Smith knows that we need some elite receivers and a couple of upgrades on the o-line ….. That will happen in the draft and free agency guys ….. let’s get excited because we have a lot to be excited about …..2012 is Jags Time !!!
L F J
by Daddycrapper on Jan 12, 2012 2:24 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
With a good Offensive coaching staff and a couple of new above average receivers,
we’re a playoff team. No joke.
by jagsfan17 on Jan 12, 2012 6:52 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Good hire? Time will tell
As a fan I’ll support him for now and hope he makes us a contender.
Take stock in your lives, but leave your livestock alone
Yeah right
How can Mike be tied to Blaine. You all know full well IF Blaine fails Gene will say we need to get Mike’s QB and another 3 years.
I need my meds.
Mularkey called a good game against the Texans in Houston
but his players couldn’t execute. Ryan missed open receivers and open receivers dropped balls. Atlanta has a QB problem and O-line problems that were not Mularkey’s fault.
That said, if I were a Jag’s fan, I would be skeptical of this hire. Mularkey’s coaching record is spotty, containing a resignation and a demotion to go with some success as an OC in Atlanta. He will have a lot to prove in Jacksonville and, off what I saw in 2 games this year, not much to work with at QB.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
Mularkey left Buffalo....
as I understand it, because they hired a new general manager, Marv Levy, and Mularkey became more of a figure head who had no power or say so. The fact that he took a major chance with his future career as a head coach and left a no win situation, makes me respect him even more.
I also see an over rated player in Ryan
He is wildly inaccurate. his WR make him look good. Gabbert is better than Matt Ryan as I said before.
by childintime12 on Jan 12, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
I'd put him in the "pretty good, sometimes" category.
Excellent? Nah. Not even as good as Flacco or Schaub.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
by FreedomRide on Jan 12, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
As I've said before, Flacco AND Ryan are OVERRATED
They greatly overachieve by having a very good running game and talent surrounding them. When BOTH of them have their running-games taken away from them they Often struggle Mightily. They aren’t bad, but they are far from as great as the talking heads make them out to be
by Jags85 on Jan 12, 2012 2:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I definitely would not go that far.
I’ve only seen Gabbert twice, but he looked horrid both times. Ryan is overrated, but he is at least competent most of the time.
When TJ Yates had to come in the game at Jacksonville, I was struck by the fact that he looked like he belonged out there. Gabbert looked like he was out of his league and knew it, just as he had in Houston. To be fair, Yates was a 4-year starter in a similar offense at UNC, but there is something about Gabbert’s general demeanor in games that says “not NFL material” to me.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
by FreedomRide on Jan 12, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Here we go again with armchair "experts", who saw Gabbert twice (against his favorite team)...
and declares him “not NFL material”. Well, that’s good enough for me! A random Texans fan says Gabbert can’t do it. Let’s cut him and move on.
Seriously, guy, nobody gives a hoot about your unsolicited/ignorant analysis of our QB. I’ll stick with Mike Mularkeys opinions over yours.
Please put your battle red Leinart jersey on and return to the Texans blog.
Fidelis Ad Mortem
Bye.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
by FreedomRide on Jan 12, 2012 10:27 AM EST up reply actions
You'll excuse me if I don't take your skepticism at face value.
As a fan of the Texans and Astros, you wouldn’t know a good coach/manager if he slapped you in the face.
Fidelis Ad Mortem
Logic fail.
Since you don’t know my opinions on coach/manager situations in Houston, your premise is faulty.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
by FreedomRide on Jan 12, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions
Nice hire, good attitude
With the draft, FA aquisitions, off season and the 2011 record this guy will look like a genius by the end of the season. There wasnt so many missing pieces that he was set up for failure.
Looking at the obvious
The defense ended ranked 6th with some players who did not even make a practice squad. This year sent the majority of our defensive starters to the IR. The amount of defensive injuries should be reduced when we have the offense thats able to keep them off the field.
Teams have known that we have not had a go to, high level reciever in years and that we have been one dimensional. how often do you see Mike Thomas get double covered? really. They have played to our strength which is a running attack and still managed to allow MJD to get the title this year.
The passing game has needed alot(for sure!). But we saw a game plan built around another passer get handed to Blaine 2 weeks into the season with a receiving corps that was substandard coached by a sub standard OC. I know there is not alot of room to explain the no off season bit, however the facts speak for themselves. He does make rookie mistakes but lets not forget all the dropped catchable passes.
With the upcoming FA signing period, the draft and an entire off season to build a game plan around “Our” QB and MJD. I really cant see how this guy can fail.
Mike received a team that has a good foundation with some missing components in the passing game. The offensive failures of 2011 are defined and fixable, he knows this and he really has taken over a good team with the arrows pointing up.
I believe he must have been a value and as an offensive minded coach, the right choice.
BG will get better & better
Under Mukarkey especially, Gabbert will only get better from 2011. His stats, his confidence, his leadership.
I’m saying this assuming Gene brings him some WRs that can get open.
I’m pretty excited about Mularkey, I think he’s capable of grooming Gabbert the way he did with Ryan.
by jagzman04 on Jan 12, 2012 12:50 PM EST via mobile reply actions
a #1 WR
Would make a world of difference. Look at andy Dalton and the few games aj green was out. I believe the word they used to describe him was “pedestrian” . As long as we show the same commitment to the offends that we showed towards the D last offseason, we should be rather pleased. Between V Jackson,s Johnson, m colston, or H Douglas and a few others we should not reckognize our offense. Anyone notice that once we paid Mike Thomas he quit on us? Id send him packing as well. The only big play he has made was on a lottery winning catch…..
by UnconqueredJag904 on Jan 12, 2012 1:12 PM EST reply actions
nailed it on the head
He did a great job in developing Matty Ice. And the offense was very successful under him. Mel Tucker and our Jags D is strong enough on its own, we don’t need a defensive minded HC as well.
I like this hire. Now lets get a solid OC and get this team’s offense moving fresh and fast.
Oh yeah, and I think we will all more than welcome the return of Rashad Jennings next year. I think he will bounce back from his injury real strong and help spell MJD for that dual threat run game we should’ve had this past season.
by SexonvilleShaguars on Jan 12, 2012 6:56 PM EST reply actions

by 































