Mock Offseason Version 5.0
College starts up again for me on Monday so my recreation time will be cut down enough that I am not going to have a ton of time to do another one of these before Free Agency and the Draft.
FREE AGENTS:(If my contract proposals are way off in terms of appropriateness, I am sorry)
- Josh Johnson QB: I look at the available free agent QBs and when taking age, talent, and reality into account, Josh Johnson emerges to me as the best candidate for the backup QB job from the free agent market. He has some nice skills and already has some familiarity with the new QB Coach from his days in Tampa Bay. I could see a 2 year deal for ~$1.5 million as being a suitable contract.
- Mario Manningham WR: Mario Manningham is a guy who is not going to be a #1 guy in the NFL, but can be a phenomenal #2 type receiver. Given the strong WR draft class, I think it is imperative not to be stupid and throw exorbitant sums of money at a free agent WR. Manningham will be substantially cheaper and will be an excellent addition to the team. I figure rather than throwing a 5 year deal for upwards of $40 million at a Bowe or Jackson, Manningham could probably be had for 4 years and ~$20-$22 million
- Tracy Porter CB: I am not so sure how likely it is he will leave New Orleans, but I really like Porter as a CB. I think that given the uncertainty of a CB fitting value in the draft, the Jaguars would be smart to look at a "second tier" guy on the free agent market. Porter is due for a substantial pay increase, but I still think that 3 years for ~$11 million is a fair price for a player of his caliber.
- Mario Williams DE: While I think Gene will be loyal to Mince and pay him at some ridiculous price, I think that Mario Williams is worth however much more it takes to get him. Dynamic pass rusher who could do absolute wonders for this defense by drastically improving the pass rush created by the defensive line. Obviously, he is not going to come cheap, and I am willing to accept that. He will probably look for a deal along the lines of 6 years and $70-$75 million if not a bit more. If that is what it takes, it might just be worth it.
- Lofa Tatupu ILB: Behind Poz, there is really nothing in terms of depth at the ILB spot. Tatupu could potentially be had for cheap as he looks to re-establish himself in the NFL. I am thinking maybe 1 year for $2-$2.5 million should do it.
DRAFT:
1.7: Riley Reiff OT Iowa - This is actually a really hard pick to make in my opinion. Coples is having a nice showing at the Senior Bowl, but I still think that everything said and done he s just going to be a little too risky of a pick to warrant the selection. I think the pick comes down to Reiff and Martin, and at this very moment I am more a fan of Reiff than of Martin. That could change, and then my pick would change, but either tackle appears to me right now as the likely picks based on talent and need.
2.6: Vinny Curry DE Marshall - I am a big fan of Curry's and think he will be a phenomenal player in the NFL. Call it a sixth sense, but ever since I have start paying serious attention to the draft, I have had a pretty solid record of knowing which early round 4-3 DE/3-4 OLB prospects will be good and which ones wouldn't.. Curry in my mind is going to be a very good player in the NFL, and coupled with Mario Williams(or even Mincey) would immediately boost the Jaguars "rushmen" to a new level.
3.7: Michael Brewster C Ohio State - I have a feeling Gene is going to fall in love with Brewster as a prospect and is going to be pleasantly surprised when Brewster is available with the 3rd round pick. While I am almost sure Gene will be looking WR in the 3rd(assuming he does not get one in the first two rounds), I am not sure value will match as well as Brewster matches at the pick.
4.6: Jarius Wright WR Arkansas - I think that Gene would prefer to find a guy like TY Hilton there, but I think he will manage to be taken by then, so Gene gets another good option at WR. Wright might be the quickest WR in the entire draft this year, and he should be able to stretch the field for this offense.
5.7: Jeff Fuller WR Texas A&M - To be honest, I do not like Fuller all that much. Nothing about him, other than his size really makes me think he has much hope of doing well in the NFL. HOWEVER, I think that Gene Smith has taken a liking to this guy and will embrace the challenge of extracting the potential out of this kid. With a top WR coach, Gene might get his wish, since not too long ago Fuller was being thought of very highly.
6.6: Asa Jackson CB Cal-Poly - I am not sure I have any real justification for the pick. Jackson is a pretty talented CB who I happen to think might be a late round guy who contributes very nicely at the NFL level.
Partial Roster going into camp(includes resigned FAs and UDFAs in italics):
QB: Gabbert, Johnson, Corp
RB: MJD, Jennings, Karim, Harris, Jones, Owens, Bolen,
WR: Manningham, J. Wright, Fuller, Dillard, Shorts, Thomas, West, Price, Brazill, Tuinei
TE: Lewis, Miller, Cloherty, Potter, Chichester
OL: Monroe, Britton, Meester, Nwaneri, Rackley, Reiff, Bradfield, Brewster, Estes, Adams, Asper
DL: Alualu, Knighton, Williams, Curry, Douzable, Lane, Irvin, Chick, Jean-Baptiste
LB: Poz, Session, Smith, Allen, Bosworth, Tatupu, Trantin, Messina, Abreu
DB: Lowery, Landry, Cox, Middleton, Prosinski, Isaac, Coleman, Greene, Whitehead, Jackson, Rutland, Youboty
ST: Lanning, Scobee, Cain, Nortman
****I do realize the Jags go into this year without a #1 receiver, and so that is an obvious fault of this mock, but I stuck to value in the draft and what I perceived was fiscal responsibility in free agency. When I chose free agents, I did not realize that I would find better value in the early rounds when a potential #1 guy could be drafted.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
could very well be the case
I am not really so sure on these things. I saw Richard Marshall is making 3.5 so I figured around that would be suitable given he is coming off of a much lower contract
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
Why didn't we just keep Mike Sims-Walker?
Mario Manningham is a guy who is not going to be a #1 guy in the NFL, but can be a phenomenal #2 type receiver.
Anyone interested in making money easy and quick on the interne, let me know through twitter or facebook(preferably facebook).
"thanks for hating"
"Give it up now before its too late!…. CJ will be shut down? Nevermind, its already too late." AZ TiTan10
are you comparing MSW to Mannigham?!
are you crazy?!!!! Manningham is a significantly better player who will be able to contribute more than MSW could ever dream of contributing.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
you didnt get the joke.........
you said a phenomenal #2, which is what MSW was. I don’t want Manninghsm unless he we get a #1.
Anyone interested in making money easy and quick on the interne, let me know through twitter or facebook(preferably facebook).
"thanks for hating"
"Give it up now before its too late!…. CJ will be shut down? Nevermind, its already too late." AZ TiTan10
by rhettchrystal on Jan 27, 2012 6:29 PM EST up reply actions
so yes, you care comparing the two.
I’d take Manningham over MSW any day, but I agree. We need a real #1 and I don’t see Manningham as that
by kungfuman104 on Jan 29, 2012 12:13 AM EST up reply actions
Manningham is better
but if were looking for just a #2 receiver, we should of just kept MSW.
Anyone interested in making money easy and quick on the interne, let me know through twitter or facebook(preferably facebook).
"thanks for hating"
"Give it up now before its too late!…. CJ will be shut down? Nevermind, its already too late." AZ TiTan10
by rhettchrystal on Jan 29, 2012 11:05 AM EST up reply actions
not sure I follow your logic
why not just keep all the guys we already have if we are looking for wide receiver? the point is to improve, and MSW is significantly worse than Manningham so you improve @ WR2 with Manningham.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
by Jagsrok9008 on Jan 29, 2012 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
I like it pretty good but WR will still be week.
SCALP'EM
Jesus is Lord!
by Thunder64 on Jan 27, 2012 7:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I like where your heads at with this. Dreams scenarios, no doubt…
by Luv4Chr!st on Jan 27, 2012 9:53 PM EST via Android app reply actions 1 recs
that
would be the draft of the century if u replace fuller with Bentley the CB
I would much rather throw more money at #1 WR
then hope the other guys figure out how to be 2s and 3s. I say Blaine is screwed again (and possibly for good) if we don’t give him a trustworthy go-to option. Stick him with the same people from last year plus a #2 and some rookies…we’re not really throwing him any bones there.
I will admit I did not get a #1 WR for Gabbert
and that is a problem, but I still think Manningham is worth a deal like the one I proposed more than a Bowe is worth 5 years and like 45 million, which I venture ti guess is hat he would cost.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
I know you admitted it in the article
and everything is very realistic. I just fear the consequences of not getting a guy that can: A) get consistent separation or B) catch in coverage.
I think this is the kind of solid, but helpful decision-making Gene might make.
Good work.
Twitter: BLByline Youtube: BLByline
2011 Big Cat Country fantasy football league CHAMPION
I like your FA, realistic and gettable targets
And the first 2 picks of your draft are fine I like Curry
However Senior Bowl reports on Brewster are he is weak and was owned by every DT.
I don’t like Fuller either big but no separation etc.
3 CB Brandon Boykin undersized but quick and clever + KR
4 WR Joe Adams 4.25 40 apparently 8 receptions for 133yds in Senior Bowl
or Juron Criner or Marvin Jones
5 RB Isiah Pead the Muscle Hamster next Pocket Hercules?
6 QB Kirk Cousins
5
6
What could of happened; did.
let me say I also am not a fan of Fuller
after the Senior Bowl, I think my belief that gene takes a liking to fuller is way off and Fuller would likely not be a pick of Gene’s
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
by Jagsrok9008 on Jan 29, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
your free agency plans comes across as cheap my friend.
Get me a Bowe, colston, Stevie Johnson, or Vincent Jackson. I want a certified #1 Receiver not some secend tier knock- off. Let the cheapness of this fanchise end for GOd’s Sake.
cheap vs. fiscally responsible
Manningham is going to cost approximately half of what a V-Jax, D-Jax, Bowe, etc. is going to cost. From a cost-benefit analysis, Manningham is a better option than any of those guys. Yes, he is cheaper, but he represents a more responsible spending of the money. If I was being cheap, I would have said to look at getting guys like Laurent Robinson and Braylon Edwards and Early Doucet. I did not do that and actually suggested going out and trying to get one of the top 5-10 free agent WRs out there to be had.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
by Jagsrok9008 on Jan 29, 2012 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
I like the FA pick ups
The draft is ok for the most part, I absolutely hate the Brewster and Fuller picks though.
I personally don’t believe this team needs a “#1 receiver” like most people, I think having a really good core is more important than having just one good WR, the Packers for example don’t really have a “#1 receiver” but they all run pretty crisp routes and play well off each other, thats what the team needs.
by Sylvester.The.Jaguar.fan on Jan 29, 2012 11:44 AM EST reply actions































